Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> That's not the way to go... waiting does rarely fix problems. Either
>> it's a (temporary) bug in the change made by Joachim Breitner or the
>> set of available packages has changed on sparc (and you should be able to
>> check that yourself with rmadison).
>>
>> Ccing Joa
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:26:47PM +0800, feng shu wrote:
> > 'Move of packages' long descriptions into a separate "translated
> > package list", which will facilitate their translation and also
> > provide a smaller footprint for embedded systems thanks to smaller
> > Packages files.
>
>
> W
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:51:40 +0200
Luk Claes wrote:
> Unfortunately the job does not look at what was the previous situation,
Do you have any plan to change this?
Surely if it is difficult or heavy job, stay it away.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
Hi SRMs,
I broke the xserver-xorg package's postinst script in the lenny r2
update. Maximiliano was kind enough to fix my mistake and test the
updated package, which is sitting in p-u-new. Please accept for 5.0.3
(sooner is probably better, so people with b0rked installs can get the
fix from p-u
Hi:
I have tried Debian 5.0.1 and I liked it. However, I was disappointed
in that it doesn't seem to have any wireless configuration capability.
It only automatically configures a network cable card.
This capability is important to me and I am sure others as well
that have only one cable connect
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I broke the xserver-xorg package's postinst script in the lenny r2
> update. Maximiliano was kind enough to fix my mistake and test the
> updated package, which is sitting in p-u-new. Please accept for 5.0.3
> (sooner is probably better,
On 07/30/2009 07:44 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/07/msg2.html
I can't comment on this issue. I hope Dave can?
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 03:08 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:52:25AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
> > > It has been in unstable fo
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Should imagemagick be unblocked? It has been waiting 50 days due to
>> being held back by dato:
>
> We'll look at it soon. Last time we tried britney coredumped because of
> EN
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:50:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 03:08 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:52:25AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > cpuburn 0.82-1 is blo
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 07:38:08PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> Should imagemagick be unblocked? It has been waiting 50 days due to
> >> being held back by dato:
> > We'
Hello,
since there might be a freeze this year I would like like to upload
gnutls 2.8.1 to sid soonish. The soname is unchanged just shlibs
have been bumped.
The major pain is this one: In the new stable release libgnutls-config
and the m4 helper code for invoking it from ./configure have been
12 matches
Mail list logo
