unblock freetype, cairo, pango1.0?

2009-08-10 Thread Paul Wise
Hi, Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed). -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#539687: marked as done (libogg-dev: Removal of .la should have been coordinated with other packages)

2009-08-10 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Ron wrote: > At least upstream seems active on that one. And the maintainer was around > to respond to #518037 in March, even if their response wasn't entirely > satisfactory and upstream themselves asked to reopen it :/ So he's not > entirely MIA ... OTOH, Erik, the upstream maintainer, does s

Re: Bug#539687: marked as done (libogg-dev: Removal of .la should have been coordinated with other packages)

2009-08-10 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Erik de Castro Lopo] > I'm think I'm coming in rather late on this, but why were these .la > files removed? I've read through bug#539687 and its still not clear. I can't speak for Ron, but in general, the reason to remove .la files is that pkg-config (and the .pc files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig) off

Unidentified subject!

2009-08-10 Thread Grzegorz Szymański
unsubscribe -- Szukasz pracy? Sprawdź nasze oferty! http://link.interia.pl/f22b8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#539687: marked as done (libogg-dev: Removal of .la should have been coordinated with other packages)

2009-08-10 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Erik de Castro Lopo] > > I'm think I'm coming in rather late on this, but why were these .la > > files removed? I've read through bug#539687 and its still not clear. > > I can't speak for Ron, Thanks Peter, you'll do. > but in general, the reason to remove .la files >

libcdio transition

2009-08-10 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, The new libcdio in still waiting in unstable, after 32 days, although all depending packages have been successfully rebuilt against it (according to https://buildd.debian.org/transitions/summary.html). As far as I understand it, this is because some maintainers of depending packages (such a

Wireshark 1.0.x updates for Etch

2009-08-10 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, We had a discussion with Moritz Muehlenhoff from the Security Team and he proposed to include Wireshark bugfix releases in Debian stable updates. The current stable, Lenny contains wireshark 1.0.3 and 1.0.8, the latest version form the 1.0.x branch was already packaged and uploaded to unstable