Re: unblock freetype, cairo, pango1.0?

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All > > three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed). > > Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd pr

Re: Please unblock gtk2-engines

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 12:37 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > gtk2-engines 1:2.18.2-1 has been ready to migrate for quite a while, so > could you please unblock it? Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.3-2 (udeb)

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 06:24 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.3-2 (udeb) Unblocked (and just waiting for the powerpc build to be uploaded). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: unblock freetype, cairo, pango1.0?

On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All > three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed). Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd prefer an ack (or at least a moo) from the maintainers. Cheers, Adam

Re: Please hint gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon together

Josselin Mouette wrote, Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:06:09 +0200 gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon need to migrate to testing together; they are both ready to migrate, and this should fix GNOME being completely broken in testing (#538879 and friends). Added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Please hint gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon together

Hi, gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon need to migrate to testing together; they are both ready to migrate, and this should fix GNOME being completely broken in testing (#538879 and friends). Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope th

Re: sbuild bug #395271 on various buildds

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 00:18 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:42:25PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > isn't the problem rather that an older version is provided by perl-modules > > which is overridden by a real package which has a newer version? Still > > broken IMHO, though. >

Re: sbuild bug #395271 on various buildds

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 23:19 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > This is an ongoing process, having a more recent sbuild on them is also > needed to properly support new package format for instance... That's reassuring. :) It would be nice if this could happen sooner rather than later, because potentially t