sid repository has problem

2009-08-30 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dear all, i use apt-get install php5-mysql from sid repository.But i saw package libmysqlclient15off doesn't exist php5-mysql depend on it. Yours, Mohsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: sid repository has problem

2009-08-30 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh moh...@pahlevanzadeh.org writes: i use apt-get install php5-mysql from sid repository.But i saw package libmysqlclient15off doesn't exist php5-mysql depend on it. Yes, we know. We are currently transitioning from mysql-5.0 (with libmysqlclient15off as client lib) to

Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, Boost used to contain regular library names without an -st or -mt suffix to indicate building for single- or multi-threaded use. Boost 1.57/58 (if not earlier) switched to only providing libraries with an -mt suffix. This was fine, but did mean as an upstream I was required to patch my

Re: Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, thanks for notifying us. * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]: /usr/share/doc/libboost-program-options1.39-dev/README.Debian still lists '-lboost_program_options-mt' as the name to use, however. Is this change intentional, or just a bug in the 1.59 packaging? Does this

Re: scheduling ICU 4.2 transition

2009-08-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once

Re: Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi folks, I apologize for the mess. On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Hi, thanks for notifying us. * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]: /usr/share/doc/libboost-program-options1.39-dev/README.Debian still lists '-lboost_program_options-mt'

Re: Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]: Is this change intentional, or just a bug in the 1.39 packaging? Does this retain or break

Re: Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 19:13]: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: I'm open to suggestions. Perhaps the best way forward is to re-introduce an -mt variant name as a symlink to the non-mt name. If that's agreeable, I'll get it done today.

Re: Security team plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-30 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Dear release people, As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be possible in this time frame. So, to find out

Re: Incompatible change to Boost library names

2009-08-30 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:18:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 19:13]: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: I'm open to suggestions. Perhaps the best way forward is to re-introduce an -mt variant name as a

Nehalem

2009-08-30 Thread tgk1
are you guys going to develope a version to use at Nehalem processors??? my server is Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5570 - 2.93GHz (Nehalem) - 1 x 8MB cache w/HT but www.softlayer.com my data center did not put debian to use it they said that you dont support Nehalem yet. -- To

Re: Nehalem

2009-08-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:31 AM, t...@tgksoft.com wrote: are you guys going to develope a version to use at Nehalem processors??? Your question is inappropriate for the addresses you mailed. The debian-user list might have been more appropriate: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ In any