Re: please unblock libpng 1.2.40-1 pciutils 1:3.1.4-2 (udebs)

2009-10-13 Thread Luk Claes
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > Changes: > libpng (1.2.40-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New upstream release > > Changes: > pciutils (1:3.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-09-18 03:15:01 Both are not blocked anymore. Cheers Luk --

please unblock libpng 1.2.40-1 pciutils 1:3.1.4-2 (udebs)

2009-10-13 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
Changes: libpng (1.2.40-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release Changes: pciutils (1:3.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-09-18 03:15:01 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Philipp Kern
Hallo Vincent, am Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:47AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > I'm unsure about the newer 2.6.30 kernel, but for 2.6.28/2.6.29, > they are simply disabled by default. They are also disabled on all > debian kernel images post-lenny. The thing is that pmount is for > end-

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 13, Philipp Kern wrote: > Were those deprecated sysfs features dropped from the kernel or could they > still be activated even on newer ones, although they are disabled by > default? This would probably break udev. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:59AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >>   It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time >> is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? > > Were those deprecat

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:59AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time > is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Were those deprecated sysfs features dropped from the kernel or could they still be activa