Migration hint needed for wireless-tools

2009-12-24 Thread Frans Pop
Please force migration of wireless-tools to testing. We need to do another upload of debian-installer to fix an issue with syslinux menus on x86, but it FTBFS on amd64 because: The following packages have unmet dependencies: netcfg: Depends: libiw30-udeb (>= 30~pre1) but it is not installab

Bug#559669: closed by Luk Claes (Re: Bug#559669: nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings)

2009-12-24 Thread Ryan Niebur
reopen 559669 retitle 559669 nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings on hurd-i386 quit libalien-wxwidgets-perl still needs to be binnmued on hurd-i386. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 07:18:09AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report >

Processed: Re: Bug#559669 closed by Luk Claes (Re: Bug#559669: nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings)

2009-12-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 559669 Bug #559669 {Done: Luk Claes } [release.debian.org] nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings > retitle 559669 nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings on hurd-i386 Bug #559669 [release.debian.org] nmu: wxwidgets2.8 perl bindings Changed Bug title to

Re: Uploading kernel packages to unstable

2009-12-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 21:19 -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:44:54AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I would like to upload linux-2.6 tomorrow, fixing the build failure on > > ia64 and a couple of security bugs. There should be no new binary > > packages. Any objections? (

[(O)SRM] debian-installer update uploaded for Etch and Lenny

2009-12-24 Thread Frans Pop
As all packages needed to build D-I were now available, I have uploaded for both stable and oldstable. An accept is not needed; apparently D-I gets an automatic accept due to by-hand processing of the image tarballs. For oldstable (20070308etch6) all arches have been built successfully. For sta

Bug#562096: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny1

2009-12-24 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Adam, > The fix itself is fine. However, introducing new dependencies or patch > systems is not an appropriate change to make in a stable update. > > If you were to upload an update which included the bugfix without the > packaging changes then I'd be happy to accept that. Ah right. I totally

Re: [SRM] Update geneweb in lenny

2009-12-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 08:10 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > The geneweb package has an historically piece of code in its postinst > script that deals for recursively fixing permissions and owners in the > /var/lib/geneweb directory (the place where genealogical databases > that are served by the

Re: [SRM] Planned upload of samba in s-p-u to fix #561545

2009-12-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 07:31 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Given that these bugs are clear regressions from the version of samba > in etch and even though the "hash" method not being the default > mangling method (default is "hash2" and it has no regression) and > given that the fix is very obvi

Bug#562247: nmu: drop python2.4

2009-12-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu These packages need a binNMU for recent python-defaults 2.5.4-5 upload, which dropped support for python2.4, as described in http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/12/msg00081.html nmu