BinNMU for enigma

2009-12-30 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Dear release managers, the enigma package is currently not installable in sid: # apt-get install enigma Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an

Re: BinNMU for enigma

2009-12-30 Thread Luk Claes
Laurent Bonnaud wrote: Dear release managers, the enigma package is currently not installable in sid: # apt-get install enigma Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:52:27AM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: That's why I proposed having a single binary package for any extension, embedding support for more than one major version of PostgreSQL. That would match how the code is maintained. But is this true universally? Take my

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:52:27AM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: That's why I proposed having a single binary package for any extension, embedding support for more than one major version of PostgreSQL. That would match how the code is maintained. But

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com [2009-12-30 14:17:58 CET]: Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:52:27AM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: Take my postgresql-debversion extension, for example. In lenny-backports and squeeze, I supported building against

update dhcp3 in lenny?

2009-12-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Dear SRMs, #559160, DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP server, ie is killed basically every night, is fixed with the straightforward patch from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;filename=dhcpd.diff;att=1;bug=559160 - this bug is very important for Debian Edu

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Gerfried Fuchs rho...@deb.at writes: If Python version changes, a binNMU is triggered on affected packages, which is damn faster and more efficient than mass filling bug reports. Without a line change to the modules sources. I do not see why this is not doable for PostgreSQL. In this case

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: I see your point and don't object to it in principle. It's just that manpower is lacking, including being able to do upstream work on the packages when upstream cease their support on it. Please note, that with Dimitri and me, there are already two people offering

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Martin Pitt (mp...@debian.org) wrote: Dimitri Fontaine [2009-12-30 14:17 +0100]: The problem for the maintainer is having to edit a package, hence do some testing and QA again, when there's absolutely NO value in doing so, neither for the maintainer, the extension or its users. That's

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Dimitri Fontaine [2009-12-30 14:17 +0100]: The problem for the maintainer is having to edit a package, hence do some testing and QA again, when there's absolutely NO value in doing so, neither for the maintainer, the extension or its users. That's only true if the change is to drop a supported

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Dimitri Fontaine [2009-12-30 10:52 +0100]: That's why I proposed having a single binary package for any extension, embedding support for more than one major version of PostgreSQL. That would match how the code is maintained. That would be a major regression wrt. upgrades, though, since an

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Dropping postgresql 8.3 for squeeze

2009-12-30 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org writes: Dimitri Fontaine [2009-12-30 10:52 +0100]: That's why I proposed having a single binary package for any extension, embedding support for more than one major version of PostgreSQL. That would match how the code is maintained. That would be a major

Bug#562247: marked as done (nmu: drop python2.4)

2009-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:27:00 +0100 with message-id 20091230212700.gd27...@mails.so.argh.org and subject line binNMUs scheduled has caused the Debian Bug report #562247, regarding nmu: drop python2.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: BinNMUs to stable after ghc6 update

2009-12-30 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Hi. Em Qua, 2009-12-30 às 20:36 -0200, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva escreveu: (...) nmu alex_2.2-0.1 arch2darcs_1.0.13 bnfc_2.2-3.1 c2hs_0.15.1-4 cpphs_0.7-4 darcs_2.0.2-3 darcs-buildpackage_0.5.12 darcs-monitor_0.3.4-2 datapacker_1.0.0 dfsbuild_1.0.2.0 drift_2.2.3-2 frown_0.6.1-9

Bug#563115: RM: kvm/testing-proposed-updates -- RORM; obsolete

2009-12-30 Thread Luk Claes
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi Please remove kvm from tpu so it cannot accidently migrate to testing. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org