On Monday 04 January 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> > We need to do another upload of debian-installer to fix an issue with
> > syslinux menus on x86, but it FTBFS on amd64 because:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > netcfg: Depends: libiw30-udeb (>= 30~pre1) but it is not
> >
Frans Pop wrote:
> Please force migration of wireless-tools to testing.
Unfortunately it's entangled with the KDE transition.
> We need to do another upload of debian-installer to fix an issue with
> syslinux menus on x86, but it FTBFS on amd64 because:
> The following packages have unmet depe
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> checking the excuses for various texlive and related packages I see that
> the last one open with more then 2 days is texlive-bin (4 of 10 days old).
>
> Does anyone here see any serious open problem with any of the packages,
> or should we now wait that at
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Hi Debian-release,
>
> Source package libgeda has been removed from unstable but is still in
> testing. According to
> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=geda-gaf,
> that is blocking geda-gaf's transition.
>
> Could you please remove libgeda from testi
Hi Debian-release,
Source package libgeda has been removed from unstable but is still in
testing. According to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=geda-gaf,
that is blocking geda-gaf's transition.
Could you please remove libgeda from testing.
Thanks
Hamish
On Sun, Jan 03, 20
On sön, 2010-01-03 at 18:10 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I guess the Python-packaging-like solution to that would be to always
> > support two PostgreSQL releases per stable Debian release.
>
> I suspect that means one of them overlapping with oldstable, right?
yes
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to update dpkg in stable another time to include more
fixes/improvements made to new source formats in sid since the last time.
I expect this update to be the last one.
The reason that
Hi,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I guess the Python-packaging-like solution to that would be to always
> support two PostgreSQL releases per stable Debian release.
I suspect that means one of them overlapping with oldstable, right?
Just wondering: does the python project have any kind of support
pr
On Fri, 2009-12-25 at 20:15 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> (Cc'ing debian-release for comments about an s-p-u upload [see below for
[...]
> However, I'm not sure if this warrants a s-p-u upload. OTOH, imho, it
> does not really hurt either. In that case, I'd apply the upstream patch
> [1] to the em
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 15:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 15:40 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > #559160, "DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP server", ie
> > is
> > killed basically every night, is fixed with the straightforward patch from
> > http://bugs.
[Holger Levsen]
> Dear SRMs,
>
> #559160, "DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP
> server", ie is killed basically every night, is fixed with the
> straightforward patch from
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;filename=dhcpd.diff;att=1;bug=559160
> - this bug is ve
Hi
There are many RC bugs in both cyrus-imapd-2.2 (sid/squeeze) and
cyrus-imapd-2.3 (experimental).
What is the plan for Squeeze? Is anyone of the current maintainer team
active on cyrus packaging? Should new maintainers be searched to help or
take over? Will cyrus-imapd-2.2 be replaced with cyru
On ons, 2009-12-30 at 20:02 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine [2009-12-30 10:52 +0100]:
> > That's why I proposed having a single binary package for any extension,
> > embedding support for more than one major version of PostgreSQL. That
> > would match how the code is maintained.
>
> T
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 15:40 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> #559160, "DHCP server stops with SIGPIPE when talking to LDAP server", ie is
> killed basically every night, is fixed with the straightforward patch from
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=39;filename=dhcpd.diff;att=1;bug=5
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 00:52 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> I'd like to fix #555733 in stable with the attached debdiff.
>
> As discussed in the bug log, the issue is present in both perl-modules
> and libcgi-pm-perl, but I think it's best to leave perl-modules alone
> and fix only the newer CGI.pm
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 19:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> this update fixes CVE-2009-3637, which is an arbitary remote code
> execution vulnerablity. this is a fairly severe security issue, but
> contrib is not security-supported, so this update is being made
> available through proposed-updates
16 matches
Mail list logo
