Hi,
here is the current status (as far as I understood it from a quick
talk on #debian-gnome as well as from a recent thread on -boot@) for
X11-based d-i images.
Step 1:
---
We push everything needed for X Gnome. That means we don't push the
modified udebs maintained by d-i, so that we
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I would be happy if you could point out any specific insanity in the
notes of the IRC meeting from yesterday. If it seems fine, it would be
great if you could work on drafting a
Hi,
the apt team plans to upload a new version of apt around 1. April that
unfortunately breaks the ABI. To make this as painless as possible we
would like to coordinate this with you so that we can schedule
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features:
- allow multiple ddtp
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 07:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- the imagemagick upload introduced a regression in font handling, which
will be fixed by a new upload reverting the responsible patch (#573983)
- librmagick-ruby ftbfs, partly due to an issue fixed upstream and
partly due to the
On 12059 March 1977, Michael Vogt wrote:
the apt team plans to upload a new version of apt around 1. April that
unfortunately breaks the ABI. To make this as painless as possible we
would like to coordinate this with you so that we can schedule
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for
On 2010-03-16, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2010-03-16, Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de wrote:
* python2.6:
- Phase 1: add support for 2.6 for multi-python-supporting packages
- Phase 2:
+ build packages for default version 2.6
+ Known open issues:
(Removing the — typo'd — “tentative” bits from subject this time,
after a quick discussion on -b...@.)
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (19/03/2010):
Step 1:
---
We push everything needed for X Gnome. That means we don't push the
modified udebs maintained by d-i, so that we don't break
7 matches
Mail list logo
