Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Correct xfce maintainer address] On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 06:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 00:59 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > > On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > 1 -

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 00:59 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) [...] > > > Binary NMUs: > > > cairo-dock-plugin

Bug#573187: transition: mpi-defaults

2010-04-08 Thread Pavan Balaji
Manuel Prinz wrote: The problem is that a lot of build systems of MPI-using software want the headers in $prefix/include and the libs in $prefix/lib, and on can often only use $prefix to point to the location of MPI-relevant files. The Debian package of MPICH2 uses $prefix/lib and $prefix/includ

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) Uploaded. > > Sourceful uploads: > > gnome-settings-daemon (2.28+patch, not 2.30) > > libgnomekbd Both

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[dropped debian-devel from Cc] Hi, On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) > > Sourceful uploads: > gnome-settings-daemon (2.28+patch, not 2.30) > libgnomekbd > xfce4-settings > xfce4-xkb-plugin

Re: The 'git' Debian package in squeeze and possible mass bug filing

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Michael, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hm, making git-core a dummy/transitional package, which pulls the "git" > package > on upgrades sounds like a better idea to me. > Otherwise git won't be updated when going from lenny to squeeze. Gerrit Pape implemented what I think is a nicer method: git-core

Re: The 'git' Debian package in squeeze and possible mass bug filing

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 23:10:31 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> Now that there is a package available to test with, I would like to >> file bugs for the affected packages suggesting this change. I suggest >> an RC severity since it would be nice to have the name change

Re: The 'git' Debian package in squeeze and possible mass bug filing

2010-04-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 23:10:31 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Now that there is a package available to test with, I would like to > file bugs for the affected packages suggesting this change. I suggest > an RC severity since it would be nice to have the name change in > squeeze. I am therefor

Re: The 'git' Debian package in squeeze and possible mass bug filing

2010-04-08 Thread Michael Biebl
On 08.04.2010 06:10, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hello, > > Gerrit Pape wrote: > >> I'm about to provide a new git binary package from the git-core (the >> distributed revision control system) source, so that 'apt-get install >> git' installs the git content tracker in squeeze. > If the git-core

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2010-04-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it > and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some > interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now > EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't ful