"Jason Kolpin" wrote:
>As a user of this software in production environments and a long time
>Debian user at various levels I must admit this Clamav issue is simply a
>pain. It seems like this whole issue has lasted years now in many
>various forms and it is frustrating when you are relying
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:29:58PM -0600, Jason Kolpin wrote:
seem to simply refuse to work with. I fail to understand this, and I'm
no genius but there must be a way for the entire Debian team to figure
some sort of elegant, permanent, and secure solution to this whole thing
instead of patc
As a user of this software in production environments and a long time
Debian user at various levels I must admit this Clamav issue is simply a
pain. It seems like this whole issue has lasted years now in many
various forms and it is frustrating when you are relying on a piece of
software to do
On 2010-04-15 22:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 20:58 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:35:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The clamav project have announced that they will be publishing a
specially formed virus signature which disables older versions of
Kurt Roeckx wrote ..
> What does this mean exactly?
It means that versions older than 0.95 will be remotely disabled by the ClamAV
folks once your copy of ClamAV gets the CVD update that includes what I like to
call the special "self-destruct" code. :)
It means that you need to be running le
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:52:47PM -0700, Jason Self wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote ..
>
> > What does this mean exactly?
>
> It means that versions older than 0.95 will be remotely disabled by the
> ClamAV
> folks once your copy of ClamAV gets the CVD update that includes what I like
> to
> ca
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 20:58 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:35:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > The clamav project have announced that they will be publishing a
> > specially formed virus signature which disables older versions of the
> > software, including the ve
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:35:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> The clamav project have announced that they will be publishing a
> specially formed virus signature which disables older versions of the
> software, including the version in lenny. If you have not yet migrated
> to using the vol
On Thu, April 15, 2010 15:50, Santiago Vila wrote:
> http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2009/10/05/eol-clamav-094/
>
> "Starting from 15 April 2010 our CVD will contain a special signature
> which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95 - that is to
> say older than 1 year"
>
> Please tell me t
On 04/15/2010 04:50 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
With "clamscan" i can still scan files, but it now prints
LibClamAV Warning:
***
LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated.
***
LibClamAV Warning: *** DON'T PANIC! R
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The clamav project have announced that they will be publishing a
> specially formed virus signature which disables older versions of the
> software, including the version in lenny.
Ok, this is the official announce:
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2009
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [reply-to set to -volatile]
Sorry, not subscribed to volatile. Moreover, this reply is about
Debian releasing clamav in its current state at all, be it in volatile
or in another section/repository.
> The clamav project have announced that they will b
Sven Joachim writes:
> It's not so easy since there are a few packages which would be broken:
...
> Note that this comes from xemacs21 not being in testing; the xemacs21
> maintainer's lack of response to RC bugs suggests that maybe it will not
> be released with squeeze.
Yesterday xemacs21 ent
13 matches
Mail list logo
