Re: Some of luk's hints need to be reactivated

Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org (29/04/2010): block youtube-dl block kcheckgmail (flashplugin-nonfree too maybe?) At least the first two packages are not meant to be released because they are very likely going to break (multiple times) during squeeze's lifetime. Usually, packages

Re: Some of luk's hints need to be reactivated

* Raphael Geissert (geiss...@debian.org) [100430 05:51]: block youtube-dl block kcheckgmail Why are there no RC bugs if the packages are not meant to be released? Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#579795: nmu: libapt dependencies

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu This is a bit of a meta binNMU request. The apt team wants to upload a new version with a ABI break to unstable. The version is

Re: Please help a apt ABI break by providing bin-NMUs

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:33:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, Hi, sorry for the delayed answer. On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:53 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: 2010/3/19 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org: bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features: - allow multiple