NEW changes in proposedupdates

2010-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
Processing changes file: mailman_2.1.11-11+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ofbnd-iz...@ries.debian.org

Re: Re: blacs-mpi/scalapack transition

2010-05-20 Thread Muammar El Khatib
2010/5/20 Julien Cristau : > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds.  As neither >> blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those >> two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morn

Re: Migriting haskell-platform

2010-05-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2010, 21:31 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > So far as I can see, libghc6-configfile-dev's breakage is a result of > the lack of missingh, so your analysis looks correct. thanks. @hppa-build-admins: the previous version of missingh built correctly on peri, the current v

Re: Re: blacs-mpi/scalapack transition

2010-05-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds. As neither > blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those > two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morning's britney. > final: blacs-mp

Re: Re: blacs-mpi/scalapack transition

2010-05-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, May 20, 2010 11:53, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: >> * trying to update blacs-mpi from 1.1-28 to 1.1-28.2 (candidate is 370 >> days old) >> * Updating blacs-mpi makes 1 depending packages uninstallable on i386: >> blacs-pvm-test >> *

Re: Re: blacs-mpi/scalapack transition

2010-05-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > 2010/5/19 Adam C Powell IV : > > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > >> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > >> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote: > >> > > Adam C Powel

Re: Transition: libjpeg6b with versionned symbols

2010-05-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 19:54:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Well, at this stage I have discussed with upstream. There is a new (non > Debian specific) tarball prepared that provides versionned symbols by > default. > > I will try to contact other libjpeg maintainers in other distributions. >