Hi,
the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
kFreeBSD as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It might be that
it is not yet up to the standards of a regular Debian release as it might
not contain everything that's expected by users.
So, what do you
Hi,
as some of you might have heard, there is going to be a GNOME 2.32
release in September, GNOME 3.0 being delayed to next spring.
For a large number of modules, 2.32 is going to be a pure bugfix release
based on 2.30. Therefore I propose the following approach:
* For bugfix releases, we
Processing changes file: lftp_3.7.3-1+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lftp_3.7.3-1+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lftp_3.7.3-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lftp_3.7.3-1+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen was
called). How will dh_listpackages know if we called dpkg-buildpackage -B?
In 'build', it doesn't. If you want to
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hi,
* openjdk on both kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64
man-power is missing, we use gcj similarly as hppa
gcj 4.4 is currently broken on kfreebsd-amd64 per #576335.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - jbla...@debian.org
Adam,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I'd like to move the hypre package from version 2.4.0b to 2.6.0b. Its
shared libs are used directly by petsc and elmerfem, and indirectly by a
handful of petsc's reverse-depends (deal.ii, dolfyn, life, slepc).
you didn't
Hi,
On 04/08/10 10:24, Josselin Mouette wrote:
as some of you might have heard, there is going to be a GNOME 2.32
release in September, GNOME 3.0 being delayed to next spring.
For a large number of modules, 2.32 is going to be a pure bugfix release
based on 2.30. Therefore I propose the
On 8/4/10, Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote:
* openjdk on both kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64
man-power is missing, we use gcj similarly as hppa
I'm working on openjdk. But progress is slow because it takes
a lot of time to build after each fix.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le mercredi 04 août 2010 à 17:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
I'd say it depends on when the RT plans to freeze the archive. If soon (e.g.
this month) maybe we should just release with 2.30? But if they don't plan to
release anytime soon, updating GLib and GTK+ doesn't bad to me,
Ok my suggestions below may be stating the obvious, if so my apologies.
I would suggest, making a list of criteria, that we believe would
constitute a stable release. (I personally don't know enough to say
what that criteria is, and this email thread may be the first step in
creating that list).
I intend to deploy Debian GNU/kFreeBSD as a backup / NAS server. I
think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very
usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage
area thanks to ZFS (for example http://www.ypass.net/solaris/zfsbackup/).
I also think it can be a good firewall
On 04/08/10 18:14, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 04 août 2010 à 17:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
I'd say it depends on when the RT plans to freeze the archive. If soon (e.g.
this month) maybe we should just release with 2.30? But if they don't plan to
release anytime soon,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:38:42AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Dear kFreeBSD porters, dear kFreeBSD users,
Hi,
the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with
kFreeBSD as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It might be that
it is not yet up to the standards
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:38 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Adam,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:23:36AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I'd like to move the hypre package from version 2.4.0b to 2.6.0b. Its
shared libs are used directly by petsc and elmerfem, and indirectly by a
handful of
Hi,
Tuco wrote:
I think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very
usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage area thanks to ZFS
(for example http://www.ypass.net/solaris/zfsbackup/).
Yeah, thanks to Tuco we made big advances with usable ZFS support
recently. Thanks! :-)
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:52:52PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
* ALSA: Many ALSA dependent packages not working/building/available.
(There is a limited emulation layer called SALSA, but either many
packages don't work with it or nobody tried to get them working with
it. Not sure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 544894 -1
Bug#544894: libtk-filedialog-perl: examples/example.pl fails with message
...can't make .filedialog its own master...
Bug 544894 cloned as bug 591738.
reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #591738 {Done: Tim Retout
clone 544894 -1
reassign -1 release.debian.org
retitle -1 pu: libtk-filedialog-perl/1.3-2+lenny1
severity -1 normal
reopen -1
tags -1 =
notforwarded -1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag -1 + pu
thanks
Hi,
libtk-filedialog-perl is unusable in Lenny [1]: even the
18 matches
Mail list logo
