Is it too late to campaign for iceweasel 3.6.8 in Squeeze?
The reason I ask is that I have never able to play flash videos in
iceweasel (under linux) without stuttering, and random freezes of the
video (but the audio continue).
Until 3.6.8
With 3.6.8 it's been wonderful, videos play
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, and ping us again in a
couple of weeks time.
OK, thanks for giving us this perspective. I'm now working on merging
branches in our SVN (yes) to upload a 3.5.4 package in unstable
(packaging
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
On 05.09.2010 22:17, Christian Perrier wrote:
This release(re-)introduces on-the-fly update of config.{sub|guess}
that was lost in -1 after a switch to debhelper 7 with a minimal
debian/rules file.
Hi Christian,
just thought to let you know,
Hi Julien,
Am 03.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Julien Cristau:
you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days
ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical
changes over the version in testing, in particular the change from dbs
tar-in-tar to dpkg v3 makes
retitle 595685 unblock: pam/1.1.1-6
thanks
Christian Perrier has just pointed out privately to me that there was a
pending debconf translation bug that didn't get included in this upload.
I've therefore done a new upload of pam 1.1.1-6 to include this fix; bug
retitled accordingly.
--
Steve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 595685 unblock: pam/1.1.1-6
Bug #595685 [release.debian.org] unblock: pam/1.1.1-5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: pam/1.1.1-6' from 'unblock: pam/1.1.1-5'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Is it too late to campaign for iceweasel 3.6.8 in Squeeze?
The reason I ask is that I have never able to play flash videos in
iceweasel (under linux) without stuttering, and random freezes of
the video (but the audio continue).
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:24AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Are you volunteering to make all packages depending on xulrunner and
libmozjs build and properly work with the xulrunner and libmozjs
Processing changes file: mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osvrh-0006r2...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Are you volunteering to make all packages depending on xulrunner and
libmozjs build and properly work with the xulrunner and libmozjs
versions corresponding to iceweasel 3.6? Only once all that is
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
tools/ods-control.in looks like it should exit with an error if it
doesn't like its command line arguments.
I have prepared patch for this issue and I will upload it as 1.1.2-2
if you say it's ok.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:11:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'm afraid I won't be back to Debian work for long. Do you suggest to
upload your proposed package to sid? Is it a candidate for squeeze?
As for squeeze candidacy: I would like it to be but I do not know.
I last discussed it
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:19:46 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 19:07:13 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Hi release team,
Currently claws-mail is not buildable in architectures
Dear Release Managers,
I'd like to request you to allow shutdown-qapps 1.4.3 into squeeze.
There have been massive changes in both qshutdown and qprogram-starter.
Among other things there is now is a calendar for qshutdown and a browse
button for qprogram-starter to select a program.
On 09/06/2010 07:46 AM, Ariel wrote:
This is OK for me, but for any random debian user it's going to look
like linux can't play flash video, and if you google for it you'll find
that this is a VERY common complaint and criticism of linux.
I never had any problems playing flash video video
Adding deity@ to cc...
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 19:07:08 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi Josselin,
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:35:39PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 03 septembre 2010 à 13:18 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
However, I think ubuntu introduced a dummy
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:24:25 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
tools/ods-control.in looks like it should exit with an error if it
doesn't like its command line arguments.
I have prepared patch for this issue and I will
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 07:38:56 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 23, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
* Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582)
The package doesn't appear to contain any changes to the init script:
Oops... 0.20080125-6 is now ready for
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:15:20 +0200
with message-id 20100906091520.gh5...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#595685: unblock: pam/1.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #595685,
regarding unblock: pam/1.1.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:10:28PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
clone 595473 -1
Actually it's libunique that wants dbus unconditionally if compiled with
dbus support. It does have other backends, too, but no way to catch
this error or to set another backend at runtime. It thus breaks related
Hi all,
I did a NMU and a QA upload two weeks ago, both fixing an RC bug, and
today I wanted to send the request for unblocking these.
However—lo and behold—both were unblocked over the weekend. Was this an
automatic unblock, because RC bugs were fixed, or a manual one? I'm just
curious, to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:27:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Iustin,
sorry for not coming back to you earlier.
Not a problem, I was on vacation :)
On 08/07/2010 12:36 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Oh, these are old conflicts
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:25:06 +0200
with message-id 20100906092506.gi5...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#594336: unblock: pdl/1:2.4.7+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594336,
regarding unblock: pdl/1:2.4.7+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:24:19 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
unblock xmame/0.106-3.2
xmame (0.106-3.1 to 0.106-3.2)
Maintainer: Bruno Barrera C.
Section: non-free/games
272 days old (needed 10 days)
Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 595629 + moreinfo
Bug #595629 [release.debian.org] unblock: xmame/0.106-3.2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595629:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:48, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:24:25 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
tools/ods-control.in looks like it should exit with an error if it
doesn't like its
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:21:49 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi all,
I did a NMU and a QA upload two weeks ago, both fixing an RC bug, and
today I wanted to send the request for unblocking these.
However—lo and behold—both were unblocked over the weekend. Was this an
automatic unblock,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
It's accepted, please unblock it.
You dropped the version from the nm-dev build-dep, was that intentional?
(Arguably, since 0.6.2 is older than what's in lenny, that's not much of
an issue.)
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
The problem here is that nothing else on the system uses
python-cupsutils. It's s-c-p itself that gets a bad score during
dist-upgrade because python-cupsutils needs to be replace by
python-cupshelpers. Aptitude figures
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:11:56 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Hi release team!
I'd like to upload a new version of expect (5.44.1.15-3) which fixes
one reported bug (see [1], [2]) and one unreported segfault.
So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
Ack, let us know when
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:15:06 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package orville-write
This NMU of mine consists mostly of debconf translation updates (and a
debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7, which I usually
included in my l10n NMus for the lenny-squeeze release
Hi,
My last upload removes the use of a deprecated return value of new by
reference. Please unblock php-xml-parser to have the issue fixed.
Note that I'm preparing other fixes of the same kind that I already
spotted (namely, for libnusoap-php (that I will adopt since there's an
RFA after I
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 00:55:15 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Please unblock package pstack as it fixes bug #360922 that makes pstack
useless. This bug has severity important and pstack satisfy the unblock
rules by being of priority optional.
The severity for 'makes this package useless'
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:07:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
The problem here is that nothing else on the system uses
python-cupsutils. It's s-c-p itself that gets a bad score during
dist-upgrade because
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
Ack, let us know when it's accepted.
Expect is accepted now.
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
plymouth (0.8.3-8) unstable; urgency=low
[ Anisse Astier ]
* Adding fontconfig-fontconfig to depends.
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Updating postinst script to deal with not just with empty but also
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:25:48 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
Ack, let us know when it's accepted.
Expect is accepted now.
Unblocked, thanks for your
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:22:56 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
OK, these should be fine to go in now. Could you please unblock them?
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:36:58 -0400, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Please unblock sisu 2.6.3-4, which contains code and documentation fixes
contributed for Squeeze.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, September 6, 2010 04:24, Simon Horman wrote:
I would like the upload of 1.17.1-2+lenny1 considred.
My proposal resolves two bugs.
* 595207: This is a fix for CVE-2009-3555 and enables
session renegotiation to work with Thunderbird 3.1.
This was resolve din
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 07:51:59 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:11:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'm afraid I won't be back to Debian work for long. Do you suggest to
upload your proposed package to sid? Is it a candidate for squeeze?
As for squeeze
On Sun, September 5, 2010 22:13, sils wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead with the uploads to stable and unstable, and let us know
once the packages have been accepted.
(stable) mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny2 ACCEPTED, appears in green on [0]
It was green because I'd marked it as
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
It's accepted, please unblock it.
You dropped the version from the nm-dev build-dep, was that intentional?
(Arguably, since 0.6.2 is older than what's in lenny,
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 12:22:31, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 00:55:15 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Please unblock package pstack as it fixes bug #360922 that makes pstack
useless. This bug has severity important and pstack satisfy the unblock
rules by being of
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:09:50 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
It's accepted, please unblock it.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package mrd6 as it contains a FTBFS fix for
Debian/kFreeBSD. The full changelog is:
* Make dl* functions available on all archs (Fix FTBFS on *BSD).
*
retitle 595420 unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
thanks
live-boot (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Applying patch from Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com to instead of
mangling the main sudoers file in accessibility bottom script,
create a new file in /etc/sudoers.d and
retitle 595422 unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1
thanks
live-config (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Disabling kaboom in user context.
* Using double-hashes as meta-comment sign.
* Updating standards version of example package to 3.9.1.
* Updating uinstall targets in makefile.
* Correcting
retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1
thanks
live-build (2.0~a26-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Removing desktop-base entry in gnome-full list, already inherited
through the gnome-core list.
* Exiting with 0 in live-boot bug script.
* Updating debian-live homepage in various
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 595420 unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1' from 'unblock:
live-boot/2.0.3-1'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1
Bug #595423 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-build/2.0~a25-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1' from 'unblock:
live-build/2.0~a25-1'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 595422 unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1
Bug #595422 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-config/2.0.4-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1' from 'unblock:
live-config/2.0.4-1'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org.
owner 595422 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #595422 [release.debian.org] unblock:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 13:54:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org.
owner 595422
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package webkit
webkit 1.2.4 includes a large number of security fixes, and a
refreshed version of a patch 1.2.3 already has on it with the newer
version that is
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
been sitting in the SVN all the while.
Looks like that helped, I now get:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
hal-cups-utils python-cupsutils
The
owner 595420 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595422 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595422 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595423 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595423 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595424
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 595420 debian-release@lists.debian.org
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Owner changed from debian-l...@lists.debian.org to
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
submitter 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It was green because I'd marked it as acceptable :-)
Thanks, I'd received the email before :-)
(unstable) mantis_1.1.8+dfsg-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Unblocked.
Thanks again.
Assuming that there's no need for a further upload of the package before
1.1.8+dfsg-6
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
to apply the attached debian changes, to both code and packaging.
If everything
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:04:33 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
to apply the
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:55:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
#595647 is the only outstanding issue (and it's not a regression,
just behaviour not matching documentation), and is just a two-liner
to fix.
I uploaded 1.4.12-1
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:32:34PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:09:50 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
It's accepted, please unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock pdftk 1.41+dfsg-9.
This upload solves a bug that leads to not working pdf compression
support - one of the main features of pdftk.
For this, I extended the existing
Subject: unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package cvsd. The 1.0.20 contains a fix for mixing IPv4
and IPv6 sockets regardless of the order of addresses returned by
getaddrinfo()
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package gpsd
The new package contains a patch which fixes some identation errors
in the Python modules and tools which could result in wrong/unwanted
results.
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:12:46 +0200
with message-id 4c85210e.40...@bzed.de
and subject line Re: Bug#595780: unblock: gpsd/2.95-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #595780,
regarding unblock: gpsd/2.95-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:15:06 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package orville-write
This NMU of mine consists mostly of debconf translation updates (and a
debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7, which I usually
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:44:10 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
diff -Nru ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog
--- ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 +
+++ ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 +
@@
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:59 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 09/04/2010 05:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Finally, the version of the package in testing ships a German
translation and
includes /usr/share/doc/live-manual/live-manual.{html,{txt,pdf}.gz}
and /usr/share/doc/live-manual/html as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 595609 + moreinfo
Bug #595609 [release.debian.org] unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595609:
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:16:55 +0100
with message-id
1283797015.11864.256.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#595417: unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #595417,
regarding unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 15:13:10 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Julien (Cristau), what if Julien V. does this? Would the package be OK
for an unblock?
I'm just going through the changelog, not looking at the actual changes:
+ * Bump debhelper compat to 7
no
+ * Switched from dpatch to
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:37:36 +0200
with message-id 20100906183736.gg14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595623: unblock: orville-write/2.55-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595623,
regarding unblock: orville-write/2.55-2.3
to be marked as done.
This means
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:41:05 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Please unblock package mrd6 as it contains a FTBFS fix for
Debian/kFreeBSD. The full changelog is:
* Make dl* functions available on all archs (Fix FTBFS on *BSD).
Pretty ugly, there are (non-debian) platforms with dlopen in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 595765
Bug#595765: unblock: mrd6/0.9.6-3
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@celest.fr
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 16:09:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
diffstat and debdiff follow. Most of the changes had been sitting in
git since May, but not uploaded due to Raphael not having access to the
hw anymore. I'm quite happy
Package: release.debian.org
Hello, can we please have a freeze exception for dh-ocaml 0.9.6. It
contains essentially a documentation update (ocaml packaging policy),
but also two small bugfixes in tools distributed by the package. I know
that this is against the stricter rules posted by Neil on
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 20:50 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-03]
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:44 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
We plan to upload such NEW versions of Squeeze packages to experimental²
(one of ftp-team members, who is a member of our team, will help us
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 11:05 +0200, Christian Metscher wrote:
I'd like to request you to allow shutdown-qapps 1.4.3 into squeeze.
There have been massive changes in both qshutdown and qprogram-starter.
Now is not the time to be making massive changes. Are there any
particular changes which
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 08:41:13 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi Julien,
Am 03.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Julien Cristau:
you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days
ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical
changes over the version in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I built the package in a bad environment yet again - so it has
dependencies on experimental packages, sorry about that =(.
nmu webkit_1.2.4-1 . amd64 . -m Built in bad environment (again).
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 19:59:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 16:09:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
diffstat and debdiff follow. Most of the changes had been sitting in
git since May, but not uploaded due
Processing changes file: smbind_0.4.7-3+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshz6-0004g8...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:30:31 +0200
with message-id 20100906203031.gk14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595807: nmu: webkit_1.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595807,
regarding nmu: webkit_1.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:44:26 +0200
with message-id 20100906204426.gl14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595774: unblock: webkit/1.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595774,
regarding unblock: webkit/1.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Are there any particular changes which you think meet the current
guidelines for freeze exceptions?
fwiw, changelog entries such as corrected quite a lot of things and
fixed and modified many things aren't particularly helpful when
trying to pick changes out of the
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Mon Sep 06 22:06:00 +0200 2010:
[r842]
Uploaded (and ACCEPTED).
Does that mean there's no chance of r858 [1] making it into Squeeze?
Sascha
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593861#44
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
Hi all,
2010/9/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
been sitting in the SVN all the while.
Looks like that helped, I now get:
[snip]
(Julien and I had
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-06]
So upstream have verified the result of 2to3 on their software?
yes
On a related note, will the build system allow for the result of 2to3 to
be easily overridden? For example, if whilst building an update the
security team discover that there's a problem with
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100829 15:55]:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) is nearly
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:56:19 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
.../{support_uncompression = support_compression} | 69 +--
Care to provide a diff between the old and new patches? (I'm lazy, and
debdiff doesn't know to do that.)
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 18:13:59 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
Subject: unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package cvsd. The 1.0.20 contains a fix for mixing IPv4
and IPv6
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock xpdf. It fixes a regression in 3.02-10 that a lot of
users are complaining about (bug #595547). It also fixes two other
non-intrusive minor issues. See attached
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:44:34 +0200
with message-id 20100906214434.gp14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595798: freeze exception for dh-ocaml
has caused the Debian Bug report #595798,
regarding freeze exception for dh-ocaml
to be marked as done.
This means that
* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100906 23:24]:
Thus the plan would be:
1. adopt mingw-w64 (I'll update #594371)
2. prepare binutils-mingw-w64 and gcc-4.5-mingw-w64 packages
3. update the mingw-w64 runtime (version 1.0 has been released)
4. update the wine-gecko 1.0.0 package
5. package
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 23:34 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:56:19 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
.../{support_uncompression = support_compression} | 69
+--
Care to provide a diff between the old and new patches? (I'm lazy, and
debdiff
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 23:08:15 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Mon Sep 06 22:06:00 +0200 2010:
[r842]
Uploaded (and ACCEPTED).
Does that mean there's no chance of r858 [1] making it into Squeeze?
No, it means that I've uploaded r842.
Cheers,
Your message dated Tue, 7 Sep 2010 00:20:19 +0200
with message-id 20100906222019.gr14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#595777: unblock: pdftk/1.41+dfsg-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #595777,
regarding unblock: pdftk/1.41+dfsg-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:24:48 +0100
with message-id
1283811888.14317.541.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#593861: future unblock:
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/0.2.904+svn842-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #593861,
regarding future unblock:
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
