Hi Release team
I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs and one
release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below.
Closes: 597522 597555 597876 600081 600455 600585
Changes:
vzctl (3.0.24-8) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Ola Lundqvist ]
*
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:41:07 +0100
with message-id <1288330867.18258.4436.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601726: RM: ctcs/1.3.1~pre1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601726,
regarding RM: ctcs/1.3.1~pre1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:39:29 +0100
with message-id <1288330769.18258.4422.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601720: unblock: svox/1.0+git20100205-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601720,
regarding unblock: svox/1.0+git20100205-2.1
to be marked as don
Release team,
I would like approval to upload shorewall/4.4.11.6-2. Please see the
attached diff for all of the changes.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
diff --git a/Perl/Shorewall/Tc.pm b/Perl/Shorewall/Tc.pm
index 86808e6..
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Yves-Alexis Perez
Please merge the scripts and data for these graphs into release.d.o:
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/testing/
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/testing/testing.py
I guess you will have to contact corsac t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
I'd like to request removal of ctcs from testing:
- It has practically no popcon hits
- It isn't in the best of shape (I had plans to polish it up, but my
then-employer found something better
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package svox
svox (1.0+git20100205-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* debian/patches/0008-64bits.patch: New patch to fix execution on 64bit
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:57:37 +0100
with message-id <1288303058.18258.1647.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600960: britney2: binNMU handling appears to be broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #600960,
regarding britney2: tpu binNMU handling appears to
On 2010-10-13, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/13/2010 02:13 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 10/13/2010 02:00 PM, Raphael Bossek wrote:
>>> Hi Mehdi,
>>>
>>> these vulnerabilities are fixed in 3.6.2 ! If this freeze exception
>>> whould be accepted they go into testing->stable.
>>>
>>
>> Ok. It would
On 10/28/2010 06:14 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 28.10.2010 08:08, schrieb Luk Claes:
>>>
>>> Please notify me, if I could go ahead with my upload for Squeeze.
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Please upload. Frankly I'm quite shocked by the general quality of the
>> code, but at least it improves with this cha
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:10:09 +0100
with message-id <1288293009.18258.642.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601701: unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #601701,
regarding unblock: mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-9
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 600960 britney2: tpu binNMU handling appears to be broken
Bug #600960 [release.debian.org] britney2: binNMU handling appears to be broken
Changed Bug title to 'britney2: tpu binNMU handling appears to be broken' from
'britney2: binNMU han
retitle 600960 britney2: tpu binNMU handling appears to be broken
thanks
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> b2's handling of binNMUs seems to contain some regressions relative to
> b1's.
>
> Recent diffs of the b1 and b2 results have shown that:
>
> - b2 will accept binN
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 27/10/2010 08:01, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
>> Release Team,
>>
>> I would like to request a freeze exception for ampache-3.5.4-9 to add
>> cs.po and vi.po
>>
>> Attached is a debdiff of the changes.
>>
>
> The debdiff looks ok. Please upl
Hi Moritz,
>
> Please unblock package mantis. It fixes CVE-2010-3763.
>
I was just about aking for this.
Thanks.
--
Dario Minnucci (midget)
Phone: +34 902021030 | Fax: +34 902024417
Key fingerprint = BAA1 7AAF B21D 6567 D457 D67D A82F BB83 F3D5 7033
signature.asc
Description: Open
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> Hi Moritz and Adam,
>
> I have prepared 5.3.3-3 in the git, but I would like to seek
> debian-release(Adam) advice how to proceed. Adam has unblocked 5.3.3-2
> (with prolonged delay to 15 days)... btw thanks for that ... so
> should
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mantis. It fixes CVE-2010-3763.
unblock mantis/1.1.8+dfsg-9
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Am 28.10.2010 08:08, schrieb Luk Claes:
>>
>> Please notify me, if I could go ahead with my upload for Squeeze.
>> Thanks.
>
> Please upload. Frankly I'm quite shocked by the general quality of the
> code, but at least it improves with this changeset :-)
:-)
Much thanks, uploaded!
--
/*
Mit fr
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:42:15 +0200
with message-id <4cc97db7.1050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601682: release.debian.org: crm114 freeze exception
has caused the Debian Bug report #601682,
regarding release.debian.org: crm114 freeze exception
to be marked as done.
This m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The recent upload of crm114 package to unstable is just a translation
update, so it should be allowed to enter squeeze:
crm114 (20090807-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Spanish debconf translation updated; closes: #600508.
-- Milan Zamazal Wed,
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:10:05 +0200
with message-id <4cc9762d.2050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601648: unblock: pacparser/1.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601648,
regarding unblock: pacparser/1.2.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:22:27 +0200
with message-id <4cc924b3.2080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601654: unblock: live-config/2.0.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601654,
regarding unblock: live-config/2.0.10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 10/28/2010 04:31 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:58:05PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>> On 27/10/2010 17:48, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>>
>>> I attached the debdiff. Would it be suitable for an upload to
>>> testing-proposed-updates ? Version 1.44e, still affected, is alrea
Package: release.debian.org
live-config (2.0.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Disabling xinit hack when using persistency and another display
manager has been configured (Closes: #601235).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum.
24 matches
Mail list logo
