Bug#601738: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.15-1

2010-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 3.5.14-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 2 days, but there is a zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened in 3.5.15-1.

Bug#601739: unblock: iceape/2.0.10-1

2010-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceape 2.0.9-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 4 days, but there is a zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened in 2.0.10-1. This

Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-10-29 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we would release with a ia32-libs being completely up to date with the normal package

Re: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:26:50 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi, A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we would release

Re: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-10-29 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we would release with a

Bug#596899: unblock: ia32-libs/20100914

2010-10-29 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:16:41PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: You can't build 32bit packages for amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results in the wrong arch and wrong dependencies. But you can use i386 packages on amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results in much less crack smoking all around.

exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread Jari Aalto
Hello Release Team, There are ugly crash bugs in current abiword (2.8.2) that have been dealt with in later releases. I'm proposing an an exception to see that that the latest version is included in squeeze. The katest abiword has now been uploaded to the FTP archive's queue (2010-10-28;

Bug#601638: marked as done (please unblock libidn/1.18-1)

2010-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:15:01 +0200 with message-id 20101029111501.gv3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#601638: please unblock libidn/1.18-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #601638, regarding please unblock libidn/1.18-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#601764: unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1

2010-10-29 Thread Enrico Zini
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package fuss-launcher fuss-launcher (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * Port to new Xapian API. Closes: #601760 -- Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org Fri, 29 Oct 2010

Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Release team I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs and one release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below. There is: --- vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in +++

Bug#601764: marked as done (unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1)

2010-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:37:31 +0200 with message-id 4ccab1fb.5070...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#601764: unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #601764, regarding unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/10/2010 10:48, Jari Aalto wrote: Hello Release Team, There are ugly crash bugs in current abiword (2.8.2) that have been dealt with in later releases. I'm proposing an an exception to see that that the latest version is included in squeeze. The katest abiword has now been

Re: exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20 12:46 (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice being solved first. This appears to be done according to

Re: exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/10/2010 14:17, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20 12:46 (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice being solved first. This appears to be done

Re: New clamav upstream version: Should it go into squeeze?

2010-10-29 Thread Teodor MICU
Hi, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:18:47 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Since the planned way to keep clamav updated in Squeeze will be by updating to the latest current clamav stable release, the same should naturally

Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Mehdi Thanks. Will upload a new corrected version now. It was tested, but for some reason I did not catch this one. Best regards, // Ola Quoting Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org: On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Release team I (with help of others) have corrected a number of

Bug#601773: release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-4

2010-10-29 Thread Roland Mas
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-4, which is just a cherry-pick of two bugfixes from upstream. The first one is actually a fix for a regression introduced by

Bug#601775: unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2

2010-10-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking package libice Relevant fix you might want to push into squeeze: | * Cherry-pick from upstream: | +

Bug#601775: marked as done (unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2)

2010-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:43:05 +0200 with message-id 4ccacf69.2000...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#601775: unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #601775, regarding unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Mehdi, Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure how this went unnoticed. Fixed in vzctl git: http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5 On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Mehdi Thanks. Will upload a new corrected

Bug#601780: unblock: freeimage/3.10.0-3

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package freeimage. This version uses external libs instead of embedded copies for everything but tiff, and updates the embedded tiff to the latest version in sid. There's

Re: exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/10/2010 16:05, tony mancill wrote: On 10/29/2010 05:26 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: If the maintainer if ok with the NMU, why is it in delayed/2? Couldn't you reschedule it to delayed/0? I uploaded to delayed/2 because Jari and I are in different timezones and I thought there might be

Re: exception for package: abiword

2010-10-29 Thread tony mancill
On 10/29/2010 05:26 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 29/10/2010 14:17, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20 12:46 (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice being

Bug#601773: marked as done (release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-4)

2010-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:59:13 +0100 with message-id 1288364353.30602.91.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#601773: release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforge/5.0.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #601773, regarding release.debian.org: unblock:

Re: dash situation

2010-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Apologies for the late reply on this. For some reason I thought it had been replied to earlier but realised it hadn't whilst tidying up my mail. On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 16:44 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: * #546528: This seems to be only a policy violation and I have not found any

Re: Upload pre-approval for shorewall/4.4.11.6-2

2010-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:02:13PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 29/10/2010 04:22, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Release team, I would like approval to upload shorewall/4.4.11.6-2. Please see the attached diff for all of the changes. It looks ok. Please go ahead with the upload and

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Kir When I tested this it was obvious that this did not work as well as it should. I have applied two more patches to make it work as it should. This problem must have been masked by the other problem. A bugreport will be sent shortly. Best regards, // Ola On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl

2010-10-29 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Mehdi I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl. I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few more things. 1) The init script return with error 1 when already started or already stopped. This makes

Bug#598835: unblock: mina2/2.0.0+dfsg-1

2010-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:58 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Le samedi 23 octobre 2010 15:06:13, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : * Enable rxtx support: - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java. [...] If this is too much for squeeze, I can disable this rxtx support again as

Bug#601780: unblock: freeimage/3.10.0-3

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 16:24:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: unblock freeimage/3.10.0-3 I had a stupid typo in -3 causing ftbfs on 32bit archs, so make that -4. Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#600458: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.11

2010-10-29 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:11 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: I have another pending change that fixes a problem when nslcd would hang under certain circumstances (using TLS and seeing a certain type of network problem during a

Bug#601814: unblock: vinagre/2.30.3-1

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package vinagre This new upstream stable release only contains updated translations [1] and no code changes. I also kept the packaging related changes to a minimum

Bug#601820: RM: ntop/3:3.3-14

2010-10-29 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Myself and Ludovico Cavedon are the new co-maintainers of the ntop package. The current state of ntop in Debian is not good. Squeeze is about to

Bug#599307: unblock: jblas/1.1.1-1

2010-10-29 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 22:39:29 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: Dear Julien, I finally got an answer and small patch (attached) from upstream Re this issue. Shall I prepare jblas 1.1.1-2 that includes this patch? Yes. jblas