Bug#602793: openjdk-6: fails to build on s390

2010-11-08 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: openjdk-6 Version: 6b11-9.1+lenny2 Severity: serious The latest security update on Lenny fails to build only on s390. It thus cannot be incorporated into a point release before that's fixed. (See [1].) The failure is as follows (a full log can be provided upon request): make[3]:

Bug#602792: unblock: wavbreaker/0.10-2

2010-11-08 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wavbreaker 0.10-2, it brings new translation only. I also update information in the Maintainer,Uploaders fields just to comply with Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Re: advice for syncevolution in squeeze

2010-11-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On So, 2010-11-07 at 22:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:39 -0300, David Bremner wrote: On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:46:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com wrote: If 1.0 + bug fixes is not acceptable for Debian Squeeze, then I suggest that direct

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, November 8, 2010 07:06, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote: We are currently really not able to accept rc3 in Squeeze because rc3 never migrated (since April *2009*). If you are not able to provide security support for it during

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 16:50:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot from upstream, namely:

sbuild in squeeze

2010-11-08 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, sbuild in squeeze has been neglected for some time, and it contains quite a large number of bugs and deficiencies. This was mainly due to the fact that I couldn't devote a huge amount of time to Debian during my PhD, and I only found the time to begin addressing this properly over the last

Re: sendmail 8.1.4.4-1(was: Re: Richard A Nelson (Rick) cow...@debian.org MIA)

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[please drop -devel from further follow-ups; this is drifting further off-topic there] On Sun, November 7, 2010 22:05, Harald Jenny wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 08:09 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:48:08PM

Bug#602819: unblock: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks/0.0~wip20100227-1.1

2010-11-08 Thread Hector Oron
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package plasma-widget-smooth-tasks Hello, A new non maintainer upload was done fixing DebianBug#598930 (FTBFS on armel: error: no matching function for call to

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, November 8, 2010 10:24, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 16:50:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for documentation reasons. Currently, we have in

Re: sendmail 8.1.4.4-1(was: Re: Richard A Nelson (Rick) cow...@debian.org MIA)

2010-11-08 Thread Harald Jenny
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:46:14PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [please drop -devel from further follow-ups; this is drifting further off-topic there] Done On Sun, November 7, 2010 22:05, Harald Jenny wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue,

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-11-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have mixed feelings here. At the same time, I want to say sorry for insisting so much, and I feel I'm a jerk to do so. But at the same time I don't feel happy about the final outcome, just because of a timing issue, and I know the package is in

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-11-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x branch is in a very

Re: Pre-approval request for dpkg sync() changes for squeeze

2010-11-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-11-08 16:40 +0100, Phillip Susi wrote: On 11/6/2010 5:41 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: For ext4, mounting with the nodelalloc option helps a lot, although this option allegedly slows down ext4 in the general case. How does that help? Doesn't it just disable the delayed allocator, forcing

Re: Pre-approval request for dpkg sync() changes for squeeze

2010-11-08 Thread Phillip Susi
On 11/6/2010 5:41 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: For ext4, mounting with the nodelalloc option helps a lot, although this option allegedly slows down ext4 in the general case. How does that help? Doesn't it just disable the delayed allocator, forcing the blocks to be allocated when they hit the

Fwd: Bug#601959: Upload of Blends metapackages to testing-proposed-updates

2010-11-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
I'm forwarding this message to the correct address… since rele...@debian.org isn't a valid address (afaik). Original Message Subject: Bug#601959: Upload of Blends metapackages to testing-proposed-updates Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:57:10 +, Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:57:11

Upload of Blends metapackages to testing-proposed-updates

2010-11-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, to address bugs #577062 and #601959 an upload of the source packages debian-junior, debian-med and debian-science will be needed. It basically moves the Dependency from blends-common in {junior,science,med}-config to a Pre-Dependency to make sure that the needed config file is really

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-11-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi. Please, this requires *no reply* AT ALL, we don't need to waste more time, the decision has been made already. I'm not arguing or what so ever, but I think I still need to comment on the comments, just for the record, to tell what happened, and to tell what's behind the code being reviewed.

Re: Bug#588236: gwibber: lack of OAuth support

2010-11-08 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: Raphael, you raised the severity w/o any comment in the bug trail, should twitter support be available for Squeeze? If the version from experimental should be uploaded to sid, it needs to be discussed with release

Re: Bug#588236: gwibber: lack of OAuth support

2010-11-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:44:52AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: severity 588236 important thanks On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:13:34 +0530 Kartik Mistry kar...@debian.org wrote: Gwibber also supports Identi.ca and other protocol, should this bug be grave when only twitter is not available?

Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds

2010-11-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:20:50PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: --=-=-= Hello, recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source package, based upon the fact that

Bug#602839: unblock: bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1

2010-11-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752. Any questions why a new upstream version was uploaded need to be directed to Lamont :-) unblock bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1 -- System

Re: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-11-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:26:50 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi, A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as their 'normal'

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new package with a minimal fix for #601506. Hmmm,

Bug#602839: unblock: bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752. 2010-37*6*2 :-) Any questions why a new upstream version was uploaded need to be directed to Lamont :-) Not just a new upstream, but one including SONAME changes (thankfully not

Re: openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1: embedded copy of vulnerable lib3ds

2010-11-08 Thread Alberto Luaces
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:20:50PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: --=-=-= Hello, recently a bug has been reported for the lenny version of the openscenegraph 2.4.0-1.1 source

Please unblock libplist (1.3-2)

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi, A new revision of libplist was uploaded to unstable, with the following changes : libplist (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules: - Run the test suit for all arches. - Pass -g to CFLAGS (Closes: #579119). * debian/README.Debian: - Remove since we run the test suit on

Re: Upload of Blends metapackages to testing-proposed-updates

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 17:56:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, to address bugs #577062 and #601959 an upload of the source packages debian-junior, debian-med and debian-science will be needed. It basically moves the Dependency from blends-common in {junior,science,med}-config to a

Re: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped with Lenny, we should rather dump it completely. A 1.2 release could be introduced in a point release if necessary. I don't think there's precedent of

Re: libgd2-noxpm propagation to Debian testing

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 08:46:07 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: @Release team: Please consider apply a freeze exception for libgd2, as the version currently in testing has a build flaw causing the noxpm variant to be linked against libxpm as well. Done. Cheers, Julien signature.asc

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/08/2010 06:22 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new

Bug#602819: marked as done (unblock: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks/0.0~wip20100227-1.1)

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:01:19 + with message-id 1289250079.32071.229.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#602819: unblock: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks/0.0~wip20100227-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #602819, regarding unblock:

Processed: your mail

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 582153 jul...@debian.org Bug #582153 [debian-maintainers] debian-maintainers: Annual ping Changed Bug submitter to 'jul...@debian.org' from 'jul...@kirya.net' submitter 586585 jul...@debian.org Bug #586585 [gnome-control-center]

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org): Well, that's really not fair. Translators could ask the Release Team whether it is relevant to consider translating/updating a $package, I don't really understand where's your point, Mehdi. What we're talking about is mostly my own energy or Reinhard's

Re: Recommends still installs genisoimage by default

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 17:41 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: On Nov 06 2010, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 16:46 -0200, Rogério Brito a écrit : OK. Let me just refresh my mind: your purpose is to throw away genisoimage/mkisofs and siblings (i.e., kill the cdrkit stuff),

Re: Recommends still installs genisoimage by default

2010-11-08 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there, Adam. Takaki was kind and fast enough to sponsor the upload. On Nov 08 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Why does the new TODO.Debian contain what looks like code for implementing the options in question? (More to the point, if it's documentation about the -use-the-force-luke options,

Re: Upload of Blends metapackages to testing-proposed-updates

2010-11-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:19:41PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 17:56:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: This should go to sid, not tpu. Ahh, OK. Also adding new Pre-Depends requires explanation and discussion on debian-devel first. I'll do so - but it seems to be the

Processed: reopening 601820, found 601820 in 3:3.3-15, retitle 601820 to RM: ntop/3:3.3-15

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 reopen 601820 Bug #601820 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org] RM: ntop/3:3.3-14 found 601820 3:3.3-15 Bug #601820 [release.debian.org] RM:

Please allow migration of Cherokee 1.0.8-2 into testing

2010-11-08 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Hi, I have uploaded Cherokee 1.0.8-2, which closes two bugs (one RC) and fixes a minor policy violation - From the changelog: * Override dh_pysupport to byte-compile private Python modules - Thanks to Jakub Wilk! (Closes: #592384) * Upgrading standards-version 3.8.4 → 3.9.1.0 *

Bug#601820: marked as done (RM: ntop/3:3.3-15)

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:43:25 + with message-id 1289259805.32071.729.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Processed: reopening 601820, found 601820 in 3:3.3-15, retitle 601820 to RM: ntop/3:3.3-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #601820, regarding RM:

Bug#601820: reopening 601820, found 601820 in 3:3.3-15, retitle 601820 to RM: ntop/3:3.3-15

2010-11-08 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 reopen 601820 found 601820 3:3.3-15 # -15 migrated and needs to be removed retitle 601820 RM: ntop/3:3.3-15 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#602876: unblock: python-cogent/1.4.1-1.2

2010-11-08 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking package python-cogent In looking through the list of RC bugs on the udd page to try to triage them, it appears that python-cogent #596325 [0] has been

Bug#596899: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-11-08 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov  8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped with Lenny, we should rather dump it completely. A 1.2 release could be introduced in a point

Bug#596899: Please unblock ia32-libs/20101012

2010-11-08 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov  8, 2010 at 19:02:08 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Given that wine in Squeeze is the vintage 1.0 release that already shipped with Lenny, we should rather dump it

Bug#602876: marked as done (unblock: python-cogent/1.4.1-1.2)

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:22:34 +0100 with message-id 4cd8da9a.9060...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#602876: unblock: python-cogent/1.4.1-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #602876, regarding unblock: python-cogent/1.4.1-1.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#602885: unblock: cairo-dock / 2.1.3.10-4

2010-11-08 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cairo-dock / 2.1.3.10-4. Typo of the installation passing was corrected in this version. cairo-dock (2.1.3.10-4) unstable; urgency=low * Fix typo of install

Bug#602876: unblock: python-cogent/1.4.1-1.2

2010-11-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/09/2010 06:22 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 11/09/2010 05:01 AM, tony mancill wrote: Please consider unblocking package python-cogent Unblocked. In looking through the list of RC bugs on the udd page to try to triage them, it appears that python-cogent #596325 [0] has been

Bug#602885: marked as done (unblock: cairo-dock / 2.1.3.10-4)

2010-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:26:27 +0100 with message-id 4cd8db83.2070...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#602885: unblock: cairo-dock / 2.1.3.10-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #602885, regarding unblock: cairo-dock / 2.1.3.10-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim