Hi
I'd like to get freeze exception for just uploaded
gpointing-device-settings 1.5.1-3 which fixes #573979.
I hope other (minor) changes won't matter:
gpointing-device-settings (1.5.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Bump standards to 3.9.1.
* Move packaging to collab-maint.
* Fix possible
Hello,
I uploaded yesterday 6.0.1+dfsg-3 to testing-proposed-updates, which fixes one
RC bug (#594119), updates Debconf translations and also solves a problem with
missing .mo-files for Sympa.
Changes:
sympa (6.0.1+dfsg-3) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
.
[ Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ]
On 2010-11-15 08:21 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:50:23PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
1) Switch back from sync() to fsync() before rename() (while keeping
Hi,
I've NMU'ed vpnc for bug #496718, which really apppears RC to me and
should go into the next release. Please consider unblocking and aging
it (as I forgot to adjust the urgency field). Debdiff follows:
debdiff vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.dsc vpnc_0.5.3r449-2.1.dsc
diff -u
Hi,
bug #601568 (Bug in scoring matrix incurs errors in indel calling.) in
bwa/0.5.8a-1 is serios according to upstream and fixed in bwa/0.5.8c-1
which is just in unstable. The package itself is of some importance for
the Debian Med team because it concerns new generation sequencing a
quite
[ Mail-Followup-To: -publicity ]
Dear -publicity, you have surely already noticed the release update just
sent out by the release team.
I believe the call for upgrade testing and the matching call for
upgrade report triaging are worth a wider public than d-d-a. In
particular, the first one is
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
Please try the newest packaging as requested here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738
I can only see ghostscript 9.0 packages
On Mon, November 15, 2010 09:01, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I've NMU'ed vpnc for bug #496718, which really apppears RC to me and
should go into the next release. Please consider unblocking and aging
it (as I forgot to adjust the urgency field). Debdiff follows:
I unblocked this last night when I
On Mon, November 15, 2010 08:00, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
I uploaded yesterday 6.0.1+dfsg-3 to testing-proposed-updates, which fixes
one RC bug (#594119), updates Debconf translations and also solves a
problem with missing .mo-files for Sympa.
I approved this last night. It's currently
Subject: unblock: tdiary/None
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package tdiary.
tdiary_2.2.1+dfsg1-1 has fixed a RC Bug#591194: tdiary: does not build .swf
files from source. It requires a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
fcitx ships data/pyPhrase.org which is not dfsg
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
fcitx ships data/pyPhrase.org which is not dfsg
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:14:47 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
fcitx ships data/pyPhrase.org which is not dfsg free, the document in
doc/pinyin.txt describe (in Chinese and in GBK encodinga) that this file
can only be used in fcitx, which is not
Bugzilla 3.6.3.0-1 with security fixes pending for unfreeze in
unstable since today.
Greetings,
Raphael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:09:20 +0100
Source: bugzilla
Binary: bugzilla3 bugzilla3-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.6.3.0-1
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:34:42AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
Please try the newest packaging as requested here:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:36:17PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Will upload a -9 with the following:
Done. Please unblock.
Sorry again for the f*up...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
could it be unblocked with an ack from the maintainer?
thanks.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please see here:
[...]
Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are
replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for
the question anyway.
Thanks for assuming I havent read those URLs you
On 11/15/2010 02:48 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:14:47 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
fcitx ships data/pyPhrase.org which is not dfsg free, the document in
doc/pinyin.txt describe (in Chinese and in GBK encodinga) that this
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 13:20 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
Given that:
- gdm3 is now in a working state for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
- gdm isn't
- gdm3 is now the default
- gdm is an older version which will eventually be obsoleted
- there's a reasonable/justified lack of
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 16:51:37 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 13:20 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
Given that:
- gdm3 is now in a working state for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
- gdm isn't
- gdm3 is now the default
- gdm is an older version which will
On Mon, November 15, 2010 15:58, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 16:51:37 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 Ã 13:20 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
I'd recommend removing kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} gdm binaries
from testing and then forgetting about this
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 23:15:37 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
I think this bug should be fixed in squeeze because it has a simple fix
and also because otherwise users of squeeze when it becomes stable
will suffer from it at every base-files upgrade (i.e. at every point
release).
You're also
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please see here:
[...]
Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are
replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks
for the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 599855
Bug #599855 {Done: Roberto C. Sánchez robe...@connexer.com}
[release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Please unblock luabind/0.9.1+dfsg-1
Unarchived Bug 599855
reopen 599855
Bug #599855 {Done: Roberto C. Sánchez
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 599855
reopen 599855
Bug #599855 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Please unblock
luabind/0.9.1+dfsg-2
Bug 599855 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
retitle 599855 release.debian.org: Please unblock luabind/0.9.1+dfsg-2
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 602593 + pending
Bug #602593 [release.debian.org] pu: package sun-java6/6-22-0lenny1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
602593:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-keyring. It’s a timeout adjustment that follows
upstream’s decision and makes life easier for those who start the
keyring daemon later than at login time.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:24:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 21:48 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Please unblock package popularity-contest before the release.
[...]
I have kept 1.49 only in sid for some times so that we can gather separate
statistics for sid and
Dear Security and Release Teams,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:07:56 +0100, Sven Geggus wrote:
Francesco P. Lovergine schrieb am Montag, den 15. November um 11:19 Uhr:
My best guessing is moving to the embedded copy if resulting issues are
grave enough to compromise its use.
There are
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package sane-backends
A last-minute unblock for a last-minute bug that can expose user data, and
I goofed the Vietnamese debconf translation update in -6.
The bugfix
Dear kernel team,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
I'm sorry, I won't have the time to do new benchmarks on this.
The only benchmarks we have have been made by Sven Joachim:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578635#20
(asyncsync is the switch
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:43:37 +
with message-id 1289846620.4014.36.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603512: unblock: popularity-contest/1.49
has caused the Debian Bug report #603512,
regarding unblock: popularity-contest/1.49
to be marked as done.
close 599855
kthxbye
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 16:36:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 599855
reopen 599855
Bug #599855 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Please unblock
luabind/0.9.1+dfsg-2
Bug 599855 is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 599855
Bug#599855: release.debian.org: Please unblock luabind/0.9.1+dfsg-2
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Roberto C. Sanchez
robe...@connexer.com
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:44:11PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
- security team: would it be acceptable to use the embedded copy?
Note also that AGG even is a template package for C++, so basically it
is not something that one would consider a shlib. It should be
considered as embedded by
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:13:36PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
what would the effect on the
kfreebsd-* kernel be of removing all of the files which were originally
mentioned in Ben's mails in this bug report, and is that an option which
has been considered by the porters?
From my (non-DD)
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:10:23PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm afraid this isn't just minimal bugfixing, it's basically three new
upstream releases worth of changes. But, I think it's important to
have in squeeze for these key improvements:
• dpkg-source v3 support
The buildd-0.60.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libjsr166y-java.
libjsr166y-java should be unblocked in order to close an RC
bug (#602362) already fixed in unstable. This should not be
a problem because the diff
Hi,
When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some of the
security bugs are fixed in unstable.
aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1
bind9: CVE-2010-3762, fixed in 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1
cups: CVE-2010-2941, fixed in 1.4.4-7
freeradius: CVE-2010-3696 and CVE-2010-3697,
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 21:05 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some
of the security bugs are fixed in unstable.
Thanks for this.
aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1
The changes relative to testing date back to August 2009; this
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:05:21 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some of the
security bugs are fixed in unstable.
aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1
Looks unmaintained.
bind9: CVE-2010-3762, fixed in
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:33:54 +
with message-id 1289853234.4014.486.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603613: unblock: libjsr166y-java/0.1.20080107-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #603613,
regarding unblock: libjsr166y-java/0.1.20080107-2
to be
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:33 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
Not commenting on the merits of the package, but the freeze was
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:35:04 +0100
with message-id 4ce19978.3070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599377: unblock: mahara/1.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599377,
regarding unblock: mahara/1.2.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:45:16 +
with message-id 1289853916.4014.535.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603601: unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #603601,
regarding unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-7
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:47:14 +
with message-id 1289854034.4014.544.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603525: unblock: nas/1.9.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #603525,
regarding unblock: nas/1.9.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these
users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:57:25 +0100
with message-id 4ce19eb5.9020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603376: unblock: live-build/2.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #603376,
regarding unblock: live-build/2.0.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:57:51 +0100
with message-id 4ce19ecf.6000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603377: unblock: live-manual/2.0~a10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #603377,
regarding unblock: live-manual/2.0~a10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:10:23PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm afraid this isn't just minimal bugfixing, it's basically three new
upstream releases worth of changes. But, I think it's important to
have in squeeze for these key
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I have uploaded the new upstream release of luabind (0.9.1+dfsg-2). If
this could be unblocked, it would be good. However, if that is not
possible, please feel free to close this bug with no action.
A
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:38:08PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:33 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
Processing changes file: kdegraphics_3.5.9-3+lenny3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: kdegraphics_3.5.9-3+lenny3_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: kdegraphics_3.5.9-3+lenny3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: kdegraphics_3.5.9-3+lenny3_arm.changes
ACCEPT
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:59 PM, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
don't be so picky.
It is clear that their are usecases for it and as it looks
testing migration doesn't hurt.
Although I'd like to hear a word from the maintainers, obviously. :)
At this point I think the best alternative
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:53:36 (CET), Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I
58 matches
Mail list logo
