Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 22:05:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 21:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > $ debdiff ftp/pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_3.6.{2.0-4,3.0-2}.dsc
> > > 2>/dev/null | diffstat | tail -n1
> > > 164
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:51:47 +
with message-id <1291618308.3905.6909.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606068: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #606068,
regarding unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.5
to be marked as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package common-lisp-controller
common-lisp-controller (7.5) unstable; urgency=low
* Correct source registry DSL (Closes: #599903).
* debian/control:
+ depends on cl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cl-asdf
cl-asdf (2:2.011-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Mostly same as 2.010.9: several minor tweaks and bug fixes since 2.010.
* Will be happier: users of implemen
Hi,
Op Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:58:14 +0100 schreef Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي:
> On 12/02/2010 07:44 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package systraq. It fixes #60420
Hi all,
I'll upload the fixed package today.
Best Regards,
On 04.12.2010 20:32, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 06:53 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> No problem with me. But please remove me from uploaders. I think I was
>> added there due to sponsoring this package a long time ago.
>
> Being
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:39:28 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> [ CC'ing explicitly Guillem in case he missed the mail ]
>
> On 11/27/2010 03:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +, Hector Oron wrote:
> >> Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I uploaded deborphan 1.7.28.1 four days ago to sid and 1.7.28.2 recently
to delayed/7.
Changelog summary for 1.7.28.1:
* Doc fixes
* Translation updates
* Add basic multiarch
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 23:10:20 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> 562234 should be tagged squeeze-ignore. Changing it at this point
> will be bad.
>
> 587482, 587668 and 603286 is one of these bugs which make external
> folks make fun of Debian. (And I can't blame them.
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 20:01 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 14:02 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > > How should I name the new metapackage? My first thought is just to move
> > > these packages from gnome-desktop-environment to gnome-core, and to make
> > > gnome-core
Dear release team,
562234 should be tagged squeeze-ignore. Changing it at this point
will be bad.
587482, 587668 and 603286 is one of these bugs which make external
folks make fun of Debian. (And I can't blame them.) Instead of
crippling all sorts of Debian logos we should find a clean license
On 12/05/2010 10:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> Please unblock package phamm. It fixes #599282.
>
I already asked¹ the maintainers to fix their upload to consider an unblock.
¹: <4cfbfd96.8070...@dogguy.org>
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:43:03 +0100
with message-id <4cfc0767.4090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605411: unblock: wims/4.00-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #605411,
regarding unblock: wims/4.00-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package phamm. It fixes #599282.
unblock phamm/0.5.18-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architectur
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 23:01 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 10:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 0012-moving-http_client_body-logic-to-use-it-per-transact.patch is
> > mentioned neither in debian/patches/series, nor the changelog; was it
> > intended to be included in the package, or
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:35:22 +0100
with message-id <4cfc059a.20...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606044: unblock: knowledgeroot/0.9.9.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #606044,
regarding unblock: knowledgeroot/0.9.9.5-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:34:24 +0100
with message-id <4cfc0560.7090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606043: unblock: shared-mime-info/0.71-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #606043,
regarding unblock: shared-mime-info/0.71-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le Thursday 4 November 2010 23:40:39 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 00:51:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > > In
On 12/05/2010 07:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I'm on it, together with Adnan, the maintainer.
>
> 0.6.0 has been uploaded to sid today.
>
and an RC bug was reported: #606045. I think that this package will stay
out of Squeeze :)
Re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package knowledgeroot. It fixes RC bug #602730.
unblock knowledgeroot/0.9.9.5-6
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package shared-mime-info. It fixes RC #602626.
unblock shared-mime-info/0.71-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Hi,
Your last upload of Phamm in unstable fixes an RC-bug but switches to
source format 3.0. This change is not acceptable this late in the freeze
and I can't just unblock it to make the fix reach Squeeze.
Additionally, a debdiff between testing's and sid's packages shows:
$ debdiff
/srv/ftp.deb
[ CC'ing explicitly Guillem in case he missed the mail ]
On 11/27/2010 03:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testing?
>
> I had a go at backporting the fixes that looked important. I have
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:32:34 +0100
with message-id <4cfbf6e2.70...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603461: release.debian.org: Permission to upload
erlang 14.a-dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #603461,
regarding release.debian.org: Permission to upload erlang 14.a-dfsg-
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Ok. Please go ahead with the upload and come back to us once the package
> has been accepted.
It is.
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 19:58 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> whois (5.0.10) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Added new IPv4 allocations.
>
> -- Marco d'Itri Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:51:59 +0100
>
> whois (5.0.9) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Added new IPv4 allocations.
>
> -- Marco d'Itri Sun, 12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 04/12/2010 14:23, Colin Watson a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:50:37PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> The grub2 Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
>> pending bug reports which include translation updates or fixes
>> for po-
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 14:02 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > How should I name the new metapackage? My first thought is just to move
> > these packages from gnome-desktop-environment to gnome-core, and to make
> > gnome-core the key package.
>
> Sounds ok to me.
I’ve uploaded meta-gnome2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 603461 pending
Bug #603461 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Permission to upload
erlang 14.a-dfsg-3
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
603461: http://bugs.debian.org
tag 603461 pending
thanks
On 11/28/2010 07:32 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Mehdi Dogguy
> wrote:
>>
>> Did you test its reverse dependencies with those changes applied?
>
> ...
>
Ok. Please go ahead with the upload and come back to us once the package
has be
whois (5.0.10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Added new IPv4 allocations.
-- Marco d'Itri Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:51:59 +0100
whois (5.0.9) unstable; urgency=low
* Added new IPv4 allocations.
-- Marco d'Itri Sun, 12 Nov 2010 22:24:42 +0100
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digita
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 19:06:59 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> For details see http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00031.html
>
You need to request the removal of the binary from sid by filing a bug
against ftp.d.o.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
For details see http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00031.html
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik8zta-s6x
Hi,
On Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm on it, together with Adnan, the maintainer.
0.6.0 has been uploaded to sid today.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 22:05:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 21:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > $ debdiff ftp/pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_3.6.{2.0-4,3.0-2}.dsc
> > 2>/dev/null | diffstat | tail -n1
> > 1645 files changed, 80807 insertions(+), 94494 deletions(-)
>
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This would need to be tested, but 1+2 without recommends sounds like the
> good thing to add. We could remove the mail client (evolution) if it
> turns out too big, nowadays the media player looks more important.
I'm testing 1+2 in tasksel 2.87 and we can move the list ba
On 12/06/2010 01:15 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> am Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:26:05AM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> * Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.root (Closse: #605868).
>
> you know, that bug report you opened, it doesn't explain why you need SUID.
> And a SUID root bi
Thomas,
am Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:26:05AM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> * Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.root (Closse: #605868).
you know, that bug report you opened, it doesn't explain why you need SUID.
And a SUID root binary, called as a cgi... doesn't sound like a great idea
On 12/05/2010 01:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the changelog:
>
> * Now using my @debian email address as maintainer.
> * Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.root (Closse: #605868).
> * Added Danish debconf translation, thanks to Joe Dalton
>(Closes: #583972).
>
> Please al
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 12:39 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Where can that list be found? It looks correct, but different from the
> > one in tasksel.
>
> That is the Key packages from the gnome-desktop and desktop tasks in
> tasksel.
Oh, I see.
> > So one of t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package tomcat6
(explain the reason for the unblock here)
Dear Release Team:
The late upload of tomcat6 is primarily to support the l10n debconf
translations for
Thomas Goirand schrieb:
> On 12/04/2010 06:53 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> No problem with me. But please remove me from uploaders. I think I was
>> added there due to sponsoring this package a long time ago.
>
> Being the sponsor isn't a reason good enough to be in the uploader list.
That may be
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:45:18 +
with message-id <1291563918.3905.3626.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606015: unblock: mpb (1.4.2-16)
has caused the Debian Bug report #606015,
regarding unblock: mpb (1.4.2-16)
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:43:13 +
with message-id <1291563793.3905.3616.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606012: unblock: meep-mpich (1.1.1-9)
has caused the Debian Bug report #606012,
regarding unblock: meep-mpich (1.1.1-9)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:43:40 +
with message-id <1291563820.3905.3617.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606011: unblock: meep (1.1.1-6)
has caused the Debian Bug report #606011,
regarding unblock: meep (1.1.1-6)
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mpb.
While fixing bug #571444 I accidentally removed a feature (hdf5 support)
which is needed by most users of that package. This support was added in
version 1.4.2-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package harminv.
In version 1.3.1-6 a patch for /usr/lib/pkgconfig/harminv.pc was
introduced to avoid libs containing version numbers. This was classified
as a serious bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package meep-mpich.
While fixing RC bug #590420 I accidentally removed a feature (hdf5 support)
which is needed by most users of that package. This support was added in
vers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package meep.
While fixing RC bug #591160 I accidentally removed a feature (hdf5
support) which is needed by most users of that package. This support was
added in version
Hi,
On Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> It seems however, that maintainer prepared at least for unstable a new
> package, there is one on mentors.d.o, but didn't saw a sponsor request
> so far.
I'm on it, together with Adnan, the maintainer.
cheers,
Holger
sign
Hi Ben, Philipp
(note, I'm not Maintainer of googleearth-package and don't really
'know' it in detail).
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:38:48AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:33:49AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > googleearth-package fails to package the current version of Go
On 11/30/2010 05:25 PM, Andreas (Debian) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks to the support of upstream there is a new release which fixes the
> issue. However, the issue does not even really exist in *effective*
> upstream code - it is just contained in a *comment* which is simlpy
> activated in a patch in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package manpages-fr, it's a pure documentation package, synced
with english manpages package 3.27 (which just reached squeeze).
unblock manpages-fr/3.27fr1.4-1
Thanks !
--
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:37:55 +
with message-id <1291545475.3905.2530.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605884: unblock: libsdp/1.1.99-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #605884,
regarding unblock: libsdp/1.1.99-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:20:44 +
with message-id <129154.3905.2478.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605955: unblock: po4a/0.40.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #605955,
regarding unblock: po4a/0.40.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:10:08 +
with message-id <1291543808.3905.2447.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605973: unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #605973,
regarding unblock: samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:03:42 +0100
with message-id <20101205100342.gt5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#605959: RM: googleearth-package/0.5.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #605959,
regarding RM: googleearth-package/0.5.7
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:33:48 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> thank you for taking care of isdnutils. I was travelling and thus
> unable to respond immediately.
>
> On 01.12.2010 22:55, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>* debian/control:
> >> - drop explicit dependency on "u
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:33:49AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> googleearth-package fails to package the current version of Google
> Earth correctly (bug #605432 etc). It belongs in the volatile
> repository, not in a stable release.
No, volatile is not a place for crap, thank you. If the maint
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package samba
Apart from a few debcofn translation updates, it includes the
following changes:
- the update-arch target in debian/rules was updated to avoid adding
extra spa
60 matches
Mail list logo