Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
I've uploaded qpsmtpd 0.84-5 to unstable; it includes a fix for RC Bug#607472.
Terse summary: libmail-spf-query-perl is RC-buggy; qpsmtpd was its only
dependency, used by its SPF plugin. libmail-s
On 12/22/2010 02:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 21:32:52 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>
>> First, I am assuming that I should set the version number to be
>> 6b18-1.8.3-2+lenny1 and upload to stable-security with urgency=high. Can you
>> confirm that this is the desired targ
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:26:10PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:34:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM
On Dec 24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could
> provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since
> you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug
> log...
This is what the upstream maintaine
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 21:21:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 16, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue.
> > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight
> LVM is unreliable in squeeze.
>
> > it out and then come
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:34:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> As discussed with Moritz from the security team there won't be any
> security support from upstream for any of the beta releases. So I added
> a note explaining that to README.Debian:
>
>* [a8de458] Switch to source format 3.0 (quilt)
>
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:56:19 +0100
with message-id <4d13c583.2040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607899: unblock: puppet/2.6.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607899,
regarding unblock: puppet/2.6.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
I'm sorry to keep bothering the release team, but there seems to be
one new issue that has come up in the puppet package that really
should be fixed for Squeeze, I really hope
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.1.26-1~lenny+4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.1.26-1~lenny+4_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.1.26-1~lenny+4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.1.26-1~lenny+4_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:32:22 +0100
with message-id <4d13a3c6.5090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#602492: unblock: crashmail/0.71-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #602492,
regarding unblock: crashmail/0.71-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:28:40 +0100
with message-id <4d13a2e8.2040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607893: unblock: ttf-lao/0.0.20060226-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #607893,
regarding unblock: ttf-lao/0.0.20060226-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ttf-lao
This package provides a udeb package, which will be needed by the RC1
release of D-I. Having it enter squeeze now doesn't harm as it is
unused by the beta2 ve
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:05:14 +0100
with message-id <4d139d6a.7060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607738: unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607738,
regarding unblock: chromium-browser/6.0.472.63~r59945-4
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:23:53 +0100
with message-id <4d1385a9.3030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#605072: security unblocks (bind9, liburcu)
has caused the Debian Bug report #605072,
regarding unblock ust
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 605072 unblock ust
Bug #605072 [release.debian.org] unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock ust' from 'unblock liburcu/0.4.8-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
605072: http://
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:15:14 +0100
with message-id <4d1383a2.9010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606056: unblock deborphan
has caused the Debian Bug report #606056,
regarding unblock deborphan
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:08:28 +0100
with message-id <4d13820c.5080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607165: unblock: facter/1.5.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #607165,
regarding unblock: facter/1.5.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:07:13 +0100
with message-id <4d1381c1.1060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#592721: unblock: embassy-* and emboss.
has caused the Debian Bug report #592721,
regarding unblock: embassy-* and emboss.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:19:23PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>
> Will you support it during Squeeze's lifetime?
Of course.
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Strasbourg, France
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:28:01 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 15:40:55 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> > This patch has come from two upstream commits to fix the CVE and the
> > debdiff for an nmu is attached. If it's ok with you, I'll go ahead with if
> > the maintainer
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:56:00 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 17/12/2010 18:10, micah anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mehdi,
> >
> >> I'm not decided yet if I'll unblock the package (because I didn't finish
> >> the
> >> review yet) but I noticed something (that looks) odd (to me) in the Depends
> >> f
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 15:40:55 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> This patch has come from two upstream commits to fix the CVE and the
> debdiff for an nmu is attached. If it's ok with you, I'll go ahead with if
> the maintainer hasn't already done so in a day or so.
>
> jmm has confirmed there
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:25:26 +0100
with message-id <4d1377f6.1000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607883: unblock: gvfs/1.6.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #607883,
regarding unblock: gvfs/1.6.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
On 23/12/2010 16:52, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Unfortunately, we are not able to accept them in Squeeze. We are left
with emboss only in Squeeze now. Embassy-* packages were removed
because they don't work with current Emboss from Squ
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gvfs to fix a very annoying bug with some Windows 2003
servers, which is also a regression from lenny.
gvfs (1.6.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
* 07_smb_initialdir
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>
> Unfortunately, we are not able to accept them in Squeeze. We are left with
> emboss only in Squeeze now. Embassy-* packages were removed because they
> don't work with current Emboss from Squeeze.
>
> So, Squeeze's emboss is not
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:29:42 +0100
with message-id <4d136ae6.6090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#599534: unblock: python-distutils-extra 2.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599534,
regarding unblock: python-distutils-extra 2.22-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:22:35 +0100
with message-id <20101223152235.go5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607831: unblock: gnome-speech/1:0.4.25-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607831,
regarding unblock: gnome-speech/1:0.4.25-4
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:23:35 +0100
with message-id <20101223152334.ga5...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606254: marked as done (unblock: python2.6/2.6.6-7)
has caused the Debian Bug report #606254,
regarding unblock: python2.6/2.6.6-8
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:21:47 +0100
with message-id <20101223152147.gn5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607830: unblock: system-tools-backends/2.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #607830,
regarding unblock: system-tools-backends/2.10.1-2
to be marked as done
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:20:09 +0100
with message-id <20101223152009.gm5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607829: unblock: libpam-rsa/0.8-9-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #607829,
regarding unblock: libpam-rsa/0.8-9-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On 15/12/2010 05:05, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear release team,
as invited by your latest release update, here is a last follow-up for
the EMBOSS package (and to a lesser extent the EMBASSY packages), for
which I requested an unblock in August.
The version in Sid is the only supported upstream, c
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:47:34 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> So please unblock this trivial change.
>
Unblocked. I'm amazed you managed to knowingly upload something so
broken. Please don't do that kind of thing again.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:07:20 +0100
with message-id <20101223150720.gk5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607734: unblock: maint-guide/1.2.25
has caused the Debian Bug report #607734,
regarding unblock: maint-guide/1.2.25
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:04:49 +0100
with message-id <20101223150449.gj5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607697: unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607697,
regarding unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.1
to be marked as done.
This means
[Adam D. Barratt]
> We're working on determining what's happening with neon27; please bear
> with us while that's in progress.
OK, I see the neon27 situation has been resolved - thanks, all. I
didn't notice earlier, but subversion sid->squeeze migration would also
block on the shlibs bump in sql
On 17/12/2010 18:10, micah anderson wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
I'm not decided yet if I'll unblock the package (because I didn't finish the
review yet) but I noticed something (that looks) odd (to me) in the Depends
field. So, facter depends on:
Depends: ruby1.8 (>= 1.8.7.72-3lenny1), net-tools
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:54:09 +0100
with message-id <20101223145409.gh5...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#607668: unblock: libqglviewer/2.3.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607668,
regarding unblock: libqglviewer/2.3.4-4
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:49:19 -0500, Tim Gokcen wrote:
> Thanks. This is the first time I've ever done any Debian package
> maintenance. Should I have waited to clean up the #include and
> debhelper lintian warnings? Since I'd had to figure out the whole
> process (and dpatch & lintian) I thoug
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:00:37 -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> Based on initial findings and assuming a problem-free test period, I'd support
> shipping 0.84 with the backported plugin if the release team agrees.
>
I see this is now uploaded. Unblocked, should migrate in 5 days if no
new RC bug
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 01:26:05 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the changelog:
>
> * Now using my @debian email address as maintainer.
> * Sets the SUID bit, chown sbox to root.root (Closse: #605868).
> * Added Danish debconf translation, thanks to Joe Dalton
>(Closes: #583972
On 23.12.2010 05:10, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/22/2010 04:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control fi
* Adam D. Barratt:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:12 +, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Julien Cristau:
>>
>> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:11:43 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
>> >
>> >> Release Team,
>> >>
>> >> Would this be an acceptable change for a freeze exception?
>> >>
>> > Yes (assuming it
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 01:13 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
> >> I'm able to build the version from unstable fine (it took 530 minutes...
> >> :) I want to make sure I understand what you mean by "r
45 matches
Mail list logo
