Re: Bug#608190: /etc/gnumed/gnumed-client.conf has wrong database name

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > It looks ok (from the bug log) but I'd like to see a debdiff first. I attached a proposed diff which is in principle a sed -i 's/14/13/g' gnumed-client-0.7.10/debian/conf/gnumed-client.conf > P.S.: CC'ing debian-rele...@l.d.o woul

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

On 12/29/2010 04:18 AM, Justin B Rye wrote: > [...many English corrections...] Thanks a lot for all these changes. I've attached the new version modified with you advice. Now, I did download the release-notes from SVN, as per the link Julien provided. But I failed to understand what file I should

Re: Bug#608210: wiliki: empty package after rebuild

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:59:50PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I rebuilt wiliki in a clean sid i386 chroot. The resulting package > was mostly empty: It's also not had an upload since 2005, and has a popcon of inst:15, vote:3, so unless this bug is fixed very soon I suggest it's a good candidate fo

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> It's not clear that that's true for this release; it's what I've >> always used (and its full-screen mode has given me some painless >> test Lenny-to-Squeeze upgrades), but I've seen claims on >> debian-devel or somewhere that apt's resolver is currently more >> robust. >

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 603710 squeeze-can-defer tag 603710 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:57:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 24, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could > > provid

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 20:17 +, Justin B Rye wrote: [...] > Ben Finney wrote: > > The official recommended package installation tool is ‘aptitude’, so > > that's what our official notes should be recommending: > > It's not clear that that's true for this release; it's what I've > always used (a

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

I'll treat this and Thomas Goirand's rewrite as separate requests for review and let someone else decide how to merge them. Ben Finney wrote: > Martin Zobel-Helas writes: >> | 4.7.4. Upgrading with Xen installed, and Kernel enumeration order issue >> with >> | Xen > > For a section title in the

Bug#608221: RM: youtube-dl/2010.12.09-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please hint youtube-dl out of testing as the maintainer has stated it "not suitable for release" (see #608176, which has been opened to stop it migr

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

Thomas Goirand wrote: > Right. Changed. Attached is the new text, please re-read and let me know > what you think. > > Thomas > 4.7.4. Upgrading with Xen installed, and Kernel enumeration order issue with > Xen What you mean is: 4.7.4. Xen upgrades > In Lenny, using grub legacy, the default

Re: freeze exception -- bugzilla3 3.6.3.0-1

On 12/26/2010 01:22 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I'll wait for your comments before uploading. > FTR, I've uploaded Bugzilla to testing-proposed-updates. (debdiff is attached, fixed an issue found by Julien). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ diff -Nru bugzilla-3.6.2.0/deb

Re: [RFC] subversion upload for squeeze - what to include

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 09:08 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Adam D. Barratt] > > We're working on determining what's happening with neon27; please bear > > with us while that's in progress. > > OK, I see the neon27 situation has been resolved - thanks, all. I > didn't notice earlier, but subvers

Bug#608182: marked as done (unblock: openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-11)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:39:39 + with message-id <1293565179.3459.6400.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#608182: unblock: openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #608182, regarding unblock: openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-11 to be marked as do

Bug#608147: unblock: k3b/2.0.1-1

On 12/28/2010 08:00 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > On antradienis 28 Gruodis 2010 12:34:40 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> +++ k3b-2.0.1/debian/k3b.bug-script 2010-07-04 07:49:00.0 + >> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh -e >> + >> +echo >> +echo "Gathering system configuration viai `w

Re: Your "openturns" upload

On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:18 +0100, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > I just uploaded -8 which fixes the python-qt4 depends you found. I > think it is pretty safe to unblock openturns Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#608147: unblock: k3b/2.0.1-1

Hello, On antradienis 28 Gruodis 2010 12:34:40 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > +++ k3b-2.0.1/debian/k3b.bug-script 2010-07-04 07:49:00.0 + > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +#!/bin/sh -e > + > +echo > +echo "Gathering system configuration viai `wodim -checkdrive` (please > wait)..." > +/usr/bin/wodim -che

Re: [Pkg-freevo-maint] Bug#607921: freevo: (unowned) files in /home (after purge (policy 6.8))

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 18:41:47 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Il 28/12/2010 00:20, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 23:24:27 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > > > >> this bug has been cloned in two, > >> #489328 #608035 freevo: doesnt cleanup on purge > >> > >> #607921 freevo messes w

Bug#607608: marked as done (unblock: wordpress/3.0.3-1)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:20:19 +0100 with message-id <4d1a1c53.7040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#607608: unblock: wordpress/3.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #607608, regarding unblock: wordpress/3.0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#607608: unblock: wordpress/3.0.3-1

On 12/24/2010 12:48 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > re-package? I just uploaded 3.0.3.dfsg-1: wordpress (3.0.3.dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high * [e113893] Imported Upstream version 3.0.3.dfsg - Re-packaged without the hello dolly plugin (Closes: #607240) * [9d62cfd] Removed hello.patch -- Giu

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 15:34:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to have the attached document added to the Squeeze release > notes. Also, what's the way to have it included? Should I send it as a > wishlist bug to the "release-notes" package, or something like that? > Yes, see h

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:47:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Martin, for your comments. > > On 12/28/2010 04:23 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > In general I support this. Those are changes worth mentioning. On the > > other hand your text reads more like a howto, which IMHO

Re: Your "openturns" upload

Adam, I just uploaded -8 which fixes the python-qt4 depends you found. I think it is pretty safe to unblock openturns as you can see here https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=openturns -7 got built already on a few platforms (-6 was built on all

Bug#608174: marked as done (unblock: modemmanager/0.4+git.20100624t180933.6e79d15-2)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:41:54 +0100 with message-id <20101228154154.gg2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#608174: unblock: modemmanager/0.4+git.20100624t180933.6e79d15-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #608174, regarding unblock: modemmanager/0.4+git.20100624t1809

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

Hi, Thanks Martin, for your comments. On 12/28/2010 04:23 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > In general I support this. Those are changes worth mentioning. On the > other hand your text reads more like a howto, which IMHO should be > content for wiki.debian.org. Maybe have the release notes linking

Re: Your "openturns" upload

Hello Adam, you are absolutely right: the python-qt4 dependency is missing. It is a very mild one and should not be a big issue for the user who does not wish to use the python graphical interface. I am fixing this at the moment and I submit -8 Best regards and thanks for your help! C. On Tue,

Bug#608182: unblock: openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-11

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package openoffice.org fixes FTBFS in rare conditions... unblock openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-11 Diff: http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2010/12/msg00106.html (and the o

Your "openturns" upload

Hi Christophe, I was just reviewing the diff of your "openturns" upload fixing #606870, to check that it was suitable for unblocking. Firstly, thanks for fixing the RC bug on the package. I noticed that you also fixed #604605 at the same time, dropping the dependencies on python-qt3. None of th

Bug#608147: unblock: k3b/2.0.1-1

On 12/27/2010 11:02 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Please unblock package k3b > In the diff, I read the following: +++ k3b-2.0.1/debian/k3b.bug-script 2010-07-04 07:

Bug#608174: unblock: modemmanager/0.4+git.20100624t180933.6e79d15-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package modemmanager I contains a single fix for Nokia N900. (#607982) The patch is cherry-picked from upstream Git. [1] Debdiff is attached. unblock modemmanager/

Re: amavisd-new maintainer

On 17 December 2010 08:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unblocked; thanks. Ok, looks like that got in. Thank you everybody. -- Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: ht

Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian

Hi, On Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 15:34:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to have the attached document added to the Squeeze release > notes. Also, what's the way to have it included? Should I send it as a > wishlist bug to the "release-notes" package, or something like that? In gener