Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 608689 RM: pytris -- RoM; security issues; abandoned upstream
Bug #608689 [pytris] RM: pytris -- security issues; abandoned upstream
Changed Bug title to 'RM: pytris -- RoM; security issues; abandoned upstream'
from 'RM: pytris --
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this package were
fixed
so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0 (squeeze).
Thanks
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock corosync 1.2.1-4 with this single change:
* [2ebaf59] Move corosync start out of rcS since we want to be able to log
to syslog and rsyslog isn't started in rcS. (Closes:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock gmorgan 0.27-2. The only change:
* debian/rules: Replace po/Makefile.in.in. Closes: #583466.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110103-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
It builds these binary packages:
mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband service providers
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Rationale for freeze
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package syslog-ng. It fixes a kfreebsd-specific
security issue w/o CVE.
unblock syslog-ng/3.1.3-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vlc. It fixes CVE-2010-3907.
unblock vlc/1.1.3-1squeeze1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xfig. It fixes CVE-2010-4262.
unblock xfig/1:3.2.5.b-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hello,
I'd be glad if you could unblock tenshi/0.11-2.
The upload would fix the following RC bug: #606789 (and duplicate #605240)
I have attached the relevant debdiff of the
Hi,
The release team has sent a (in my reading) pretty unambiguous statement to
DDA that only uploads that fix RC bugs will be unblocked. However, I've seen a
number of unblocks for translation updates since. So it's unclear to me now
whether I should be uploading updates for Debconf po
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 21:35:56 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi,
The release team has sent a (in my reading) pretty unambiguous statement to
DDA that only uploads that fix RC bugs will be unblocked. However, I've seen
a
number of unblocks for translation updates since. So it's unclear
Your message dated Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:23:44 +0100
with message-id 4d223e60.1080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#608744: unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #608744,
regarding unblock: mercurial-server/1.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
I think it's too late to get it back in Squeeze.
What would be the risk of including this package with no release
critical bugs into 6.0? There are packages with RC bugs that are
ignored and still allowed to be released with 6.0, but a package with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 608740 normal
Bug #608740 [release.debian.org] RM: pytris -- RoM; security issues; abandoned
upstream
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
severity 608689 normal
Bug #608689 [ftp.debian.org] RM: pytris -- RoM; security issues;
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:12:29PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110103-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
If the release team will indicate that there is any chance of this getting
into Squeeze, I'll happily make a one-time upload
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package kdebase-workspace
Hello,
this revision documents (in README.Debian) a workaround for quite annoying bug
and fixes the crash on kFreeBSD that was caused by
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:12:29PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110103-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
If the release team will indicate
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firmware-nonfree. This includes several
important fixes for network hardware:
- Added firmware patches for some Realtek network controllers that
allow them to
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:52 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
as the README
says its safe to update the package at any stage.
Isn't this basically the same as saying, We don't introduce bugs in our
software.? If they put the wrong information into this package,
wouldn't that break your mobile
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Richard Laager rlaa...@wiktel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:52 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
as the README
says its safe to update the package at any stage.
Isn't this basically the same as saying, We don't introduce bugs in our
software.? If they put
FWIW, this package was unblocked a few times already, IIRC. I think
Paul Wise sponsored one of them, unless I'm going crazy ( which there
Sorry for the quick double post. Here's the thread.
pabs uploaded -- http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/11/msg00143.html
medhi unblocked --
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Richard Laager rlaa...@wiktel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:52 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
as the README
says its safe to update the package at any stage.
Isn't this basically the same as saying, We don't introduce bugs in our
software.? If they put
22 matches
Mail list logo
