tag
Roger Leigh a écrit :
> clone 522776 -1
> reassign -1 eglibc
> retitle -1 eglibc: Please provide a C.UTF-8 locale by default
> severity -1 important
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote:
>> Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolu
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:46:55 +
with message-id <1294642016.2903.18256.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609498: unblock: jxplorer/3.2.1+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #609498,
regarding unblock: jxplorer/3.2.1+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
Th
Interneta karadarbiiba ir skaarusi muus visus mammu, kaiminu, pat vina tanti un
Peterisha vecmammu
tomeer, tas ir labojams - tu esi speejiigs uzvaret.
http://is.gd/krq5w - ta ir online kara spele, kuru spele jau simtiem geimeru
visaa Rigaa, kas tev noteikti patiks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hello,
I'm hereby requesting approval from the release team to upload a new
version of python-xattr, meant to fix #609447 and #592860
A dependency to python-setuptools has been added to fix #609447,
while #592860 required a small patch to the code to prevent a crash
when listing extended attribu
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:38:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Sorry to trouble you again, but I found soon after this release
> > #609108 which was breaking schroot on all kfreebsd platforms.
> > This is actually due to the statfs struc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package jxplorer
It fixes #609140 RC bug.
* Removed gcj from possible jvms (Closes: #609140).
* Added package-contains-empty-directory lintian override.
Thanks.
unblo
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sorry to trouble you again, but I found soon after this release
> #609108 which was breaking schroot on all kfreebsd platforms.
> This is actually due to the statfs structure being broken on
> FreeBSD, limiting the mount and umount commands to
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:46:52 +
with message-id <1294609612.2903.15981.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603702: unblock: iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #603702,
regarding unblock: iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:26:40 +0100
with message-id <4d2a2810.9010...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#608937: unblock: phatch/0.2.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #608937,
regarding unblock: phatch/0.2.7-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:00:30 +0100
with message-id <4d2a21ee.70...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609482: unblock:
libsocialtext-resting-utils-perl/0.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #609482,
regarding unblock: libsocialtext-resting-utils-perl/0.21-2
to be marked as done
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
Please unblock package libsocialtext-resting-utils-perl
This upload fixes a bug causing FTBFS when home of building user is
not availabe. It is worked around with setting H
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 07:03:43PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 11:20 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Jan 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Well, I really prefer that you unblock what upstream has tested and
> > > validated but I have uploaded 1.2.3-3 to t-p-u
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 17:32 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > So, in short, there shouldn't be any need for a freeze exception as
> > the bug is supposedly fixed. However, I would prefer that the
> > submitter of #606350 confirms that he does
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 11:20 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Well, I really prefer that you unblock what upstream has tested and
> > validated but I have uploaded 1.2.3-3 to t-p-u anyway so that you can pick
> > what you prefer.
> >
> > Beware: the pa
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 17:32 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> So, in short, there shouldn't be any need for a freeze exception as
> the bug is supposedly fixed. However, I would prefer that the
> submitter of #606350 confirms that he does no longer experience this
> bug with the version in squeeze.
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 09:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:02:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
>> > > As discussed with Moritz from the security team there won't be any
>> >
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-30 on Monday or Tuesday.
This will include many bug fixes from longterm release 2.6.32.28 and
elsewhere.
There is no ABI bump. One of the bug fixes changes the ABI of the
Socket Control Message interface used to support passing file
descriptors through
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:31 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 18:43:20 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > fwiw, most of the changes in -6 don't actually appear to be needed; the
> > problem only arises when the tests of the form "[ -z $VAR1 -o -z
> > $VAR2 ]" are used (and spe
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 18:15:34 +
with message-id <1294596934.2903.14825.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609452: release.debian.org: unblock muroard/0.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #609452,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock muroard/0.1.0-5
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:52 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
fwiw, it was alre
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 03:07:56PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Sunday, den 09. January 2011:
>> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
>> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
>> needed as otherwise
[Mehdi Dogguy, 2011-01-07]
> On 01/04/2011 07:57 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >
> > Please unblock package phatch
> >
> > It was removed two days ago because Nautilus scripts didn't work,
> > I removed phatch-nautilus binary package (Stani will change it a little
> > bit in next upstream release)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
please unblock muroard, it fixes the RC bug #608812.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.2--std-ipv4-32 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale:
Hi all,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 21:53:07 (CET), Chris Wilson wrote:
> Reinhard, I'm going to add this fix to 0.11 to make 0.11.1, would you
> like to update the Debian packages when it becomes available shortly?
Thanks for the offer, but I don't think a new upstream release will be
necessary. Bt
Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Sunday, den 09. January 2011:
> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
>
> Could anyone
I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
Could anyone from the release team please review the patch [2] and
decide whether it's
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 10:37:33 +
with message-id <1294569453.2903.12087.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609410: unblock: pyxpcom/1:0.0~hg20100212-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #609410,
regarding unblock: pyxpcom/1:0.0~hg20100212-5
to be marked as
Hello,
I am aware of the current deep-freeze of squeeze, but i want to propose
a bugfix-only-release of Docky which only includes cherry-picked patches
and translation updates!
Debdiff of the current squeeze and experimental version:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/docky/docky_2.0.6-2_2.0.10-1_t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyxpcom
This release finally fixes all known install/upgrade issues. The changelog
boils down to this:
* debian/control: Conflicts with xulrunner-1.9.1 <= 1.9.1.11
29 matches
Mail list logo
