On Monday 10 January 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:50:37PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> > While this is likely no security issue I write to the security
> > team as well, as you probably want to take care, because
> > DSA-2141 caused that problem. The patch is rather simple an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
This upload would fix #609325, allowing lsb_release to properly
identify squeeze as Debian 6.0. The patch (one line) is attached for
your reference.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package update-manager
Hi,
update-manager 0.200.5 is a translation update that has been lead and
uploaded to Sid before the Deep Freeze announce, but the unblock request
ha
Roger Leigh (10/01/2011):
> Thanks, I have released, tested, built and uploaded.
#609619
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:12:39PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Heya,
>
> Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 20:56 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> > As such, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit
> > and khtml engines are included in Squeeze, but not covered by full security
> > support. We
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 23:03:56 +, Federico Ceratto wrote:
> The diff between version 0.4.5 and 0.4-5+squeeze1 is below.
>
Ack, please upload.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:40:42 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:12:39PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 20:56 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> > > As such, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit
> > > and khtml engines
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:56:42 +0100, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> Can you consider to make this a "blocker" bug for Squeeze?
No. (Which doesn't mean that it can't be fixed, just that the release
won't wait for a fix.)
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:36:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:39 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:38:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > We also update
> > > > the 50chrootname s
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:56:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[...]
> --
> State of browser support
>
> Debian Squeeze includes several browser engines which are affected by a
> frequent
> stream of security vulnerabilities. The high rate of vulnerabilities
[...]
I'm not a native
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:09:42 +0100
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: gpdftext
> Version: 0.1.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> gpdftext is licensed under GPLv3+, but it is linked to
> poppler which is GPLv2-only. These two licenses are incompatible.
Now that I come to check, libgtkspell0 is also GPL-2 onl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 609272 unblock: wps2sxw/0.1.0-3
Bug #609272 [release.debian.org] unblock: wps2sxw/0.1.0-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: wps2sxw/0.1.0-3' from 'unblock: wps2sxw/0.1.0-2'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
retitle 609272 unblock: wps2sxw/0.1.0-3
thanks
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:24:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 00:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Please unblock package wps2sxw
> >
> > Fixes debian/copyright (found by NEW processing of its successor
> > wps2odt)
>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:50:37PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> While this is likely no security issue I write to the security team as
> well, as you probably want to take care, because DSA-2141 caused that
> problem. The patch is rather simple and straightforward. Some more
> details are mention
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
the recent OpenSSL security update [1] broke Lighttpd due to a bug in
Lighty's OpenSSL handling [2] which caused a regression in stable's
package [3]. This bug is fixed upstream as in testing/unstable as well
due to the more recent versions
Heya,
Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 20:56 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> As such, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit
> and khtml engines are included in Squeeze, but not covered by full security
> support. We will make an effort to track down and backport security fixes,
> but in gener
[CCing the bug report, so the maintainer gets another ping about this.]
Dear members of the Release Team,
bug #588089 is a longstanding bug in aptitude, which can lead to unexpected
behaviour for many users, the "workaround fix" would be trivial: add
apt-xapian-index for the time being (that is un
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:39 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:38:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > We also update
> > > the 50chrootname setup script to handle non-UUID generated session
> > > names.
> >
> > That
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 00:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Please unblock package wps2sxw
>
> Fixes debian/copyright (found by NEW processing of its successor
> wps2odt)
Why does the diff (newly) include a copy of libtool?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@li
Hi,
as discussed before
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01848.html)
we need to document the de-facto status of Squeeze browser support
in the release notes. Proposed text below.
Any objections and/or spelling improvements by native speakers?
[Webkit, Chromium and KDE maintainer
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:59 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> 2010-12-26 22:01 "Adam D. Barratt" :
> > Hi Jari,
> >
> > I've just been reviewing your recent upload of leafpad, in order to
> > determine whether it was suitable for unblocking for Squeeze.
>
> New release 0.8.17-5 has been uploaded. It reve
2010-12-26 22:01 "Adam D. Barratt" :
> Hi Jari,
>
> I've just been reviewing your recent upload of leafpad, in order to
> determine whether it was suitable for unblocking for Squeeze.
New release 0.8.17-5 has been uploaded. It reverts back to old one with
only the UTF encoding fix included. It hso
Can't see any images? View inWeb Browser
Re:Your email in our newsletter database
Please confirm that you wish to receive our Penny Stock News Alert emails by
clicking on the OPT-IN button below by Friday, January 28th.
If you no longer wish to receive emails from us, and want to be unsubs
Hi,
I have uploaded kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64 and kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 in
version 0.6 in the archive, and they have been rejected as they contain
an embedded zlib. This is due to lintian bug #593397, that has been
fixed locally, but not yet uploaded to the archive.
Could you please accept them
Processing changes file: spamassassin_3.2.5-2+lenny3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: boxbackup_0.11~rc2-5+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:39:17 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> > Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I think that
> > would be cool if the script performing removals would also send a
> > message to the
On Mon, January 10, 2011 12:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 19:18:37 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Thanks. Please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded.
Marked for accept at the next dinstall; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:39:17 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I think that
> would be cool if the script performing removals would also send a
> message to the n...@bugs.debian.org so that the persons subscribed to it
> were set awa
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:18:49PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:52 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> > I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> > maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> > needed as othe
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 19:18:37 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:31 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 18:43:20 (CET), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > fwiw, most of the changes in -6 don't actually appear to be needed; the
>> > problem only arises when t
Hello,
On pirmadienis 10 Sausis 2011 01:26:44 Federico Ceratto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm hereby requesting approval from the release team to upload a new
> version of python-xattr, meant to fix #609447 and #592860
>
> A dependency to python-setuptools has been added to fix #609447,
> while #59286
Roger Leigh a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Roger Leigh a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote:
Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolutely
required for writing shell scripts that
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Roger Leigh a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote:
> >> Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolutely
> >> required for writing shell scripts that handle UTF-8 data, if you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package python-xattr
It is affected by #609447 and #592860
Version 0.4-5+squeeze1 is ready.
The diff between version 0.4.5 and 0.4-5+squeeze1 is below.
unblock p
34 matches
Mail list logo
