Dann is currently occupied by family matters, so I am preparing to
handle this stable update.
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues
with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know w
Processing changes file: usb-modeswitch-data_20100826-1+squeeze0_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sun-java6_6.24-1~squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.180-1_amd64.changes
Rejecting.
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2011 01:55:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613723: fixed in sun-java6 6.24-1~squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #613723,
regarding pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:22:46AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>The right line is of course
>
> /lib/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib/libpng.so.3
I'll prepare another debdiff including the change above and a fix for
the recent RC bug #615558.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:58 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le Sunday 27 February 2011 17:23:17 Adam D. Barratt, vous avez écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 18:35 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > I would like to enhance the "3G dongles" Squeeze experience by pushing a
> > > "targetted
hi adam,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Ah, I failed to spot that the second diff included context from the
> > first. Yes, if you'd prefer to include the first set of fixes then that
> > would be okay (although does make the overall diff a little noisier).
>
> Any
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 15:15 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:29 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:01:56 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > I hope you will not be bored by the trou
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 21:51 +0100, Sean Finney wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:27 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Thanks for your mail. The fix from [2] looks fine, but I'm not
> > > immediately clear how [1] relates to #6118
Le Sunday 27 February 2011 17:23:17 Adam D. Barratt, vous avez écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 18:35 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > I would like to enhance the "3G dongles" Squeeze experience by pushing a
> > "targetted and secure backport" towards 6.0.1. The idea is not to let the
> > new
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 615091 + confirmed
Bug #615091 [release.debian.org] pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615091: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
tag 615091 + confirmed
thanks
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 19:20 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> An upload of the new orig tarball (dsfg'ed) to fix #614390 in stable. Files
> which will be removed can be seen at [2]. Plus respective debian/copyright
> changes.
>
> 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:56:08 +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
> +case "$1" in
> + start)
> + if [ -f $PIDFILE ] ; then
> + echo "$NAME daemon is already running."
> + else
> + start_deamon
> + fi
> + ;;
Dario, this is still not correct. Existence of the
Adam,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> I noticed that you've uploaded a new upstream version of ruby1.9.1 to
> stable, in order to fix CVE-2011-1004. Whilst it is great that you're
> working on fixing this sort of issue in stable, uploading new upstream
> versions is ge
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 05:47 +0900, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > I noticed that you've uploaded a new upstream version of ruby1.9.1 to
> > stable, in order to fix CVE-2011-1004. Whilst it is great that you're
> > working on fixing this sort
Hello guys,
Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
release of the hdf5 libraries (1.8.4 => 1.8.6).
We will switch the API to the version 1.8 (from the 1.6).
It might break some packages but the fix is easy (just a #define).
We will also change the package name because
Processing changes file: gedit_2.30.4-1squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnome-screensaver_2.30.0-2squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pulseaudio_0.9.21-3squeeze1_i386.changes
ACC
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:12:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> *only* if you have libpng-dev installed does ldconfig create the symlink.
> Otherwise there's no target in /usr/lib for it to point to.
>
Ah, right, doh. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-r
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:30:44 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > (Incidentally, for some reason my system seems to still have a
> > > /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0, unk
On 2011-02-27 20:30 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> (Incidentally, for some reason my system seems to still have a
>> /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0, unknown to dpkg. Not sure where that comes
>> from.)
>
> That seems to be courtesy of ldc
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:33:27PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The newly-released Boost is in the NEW queue. It'd be good to have it
> accepted into SID quickly, so that I can update the boost-defaults and
> get 1.42 out of the archive.
Processing of NEW is handled by the FTP masters:
http:/
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 13:33:27 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The newly-released Boost is in the NEW queue. It'd be good to have it
> accepted into SID quickly, so that I can update the boost-defaults and
> get 1.42 out of the archive.
>
NEW processing is not the release team's resp
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:30:44 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> BTW,
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > (Incidentally, for some reason my system seems to still have a
> > /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0, unknown to dpkg. Not sure where that comes
> > from.)
>
> That
Hi,
The newly-released Boost is in the NEW queue. It'd be good to have it
accepted into SID quickly, so that I can update the boost-defaults and
get 1.42 out of the archive.
See http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/boost1.46_1.46.0-1.html
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
BTW,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> (Incidentally, for some reason my system seems to still have a
> /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0, unknown to dpkg. Not sure where that comes
> from.)
That seems to be courtesy of ldconfig. If you have libpng-dev installed,
ldconfig f
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:03:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:12:37 +, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: pu
> > I would like to fix an important bug
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Reports of real-world tests on stable systems (successful or otherwise) would
> be appreciated.
I am running jvisualvm before uploading to detect any stupid mistakes.
But I would be nice to have some nx server or something similar for
(ol
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Oops
> tags 615091 - lenny
Bug #615091 [release.debian.org] pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1
Removed tag(s) lenny.
> tags 615091 + squeeze
Bug #615091 [release.debian.org] pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 613723 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #613723 [release.debian.org] pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
> tags 614030 + squeeze pending
Bug #614030 [release.debian.org] pu: package ocsigen/1.3.3-1squeeze1
Added tag(s) pen
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:25:45 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> --- gif2png-2.5.1.orig/debian/patches/10_fix_gif2png_c.dpatch
> +++ gif2png-2.5.1/debian/patches/10_fix_gif2png_c.dpatch
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
> +## 10_fix_gif2png_c.dpatch by Erik Schanze
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:12:37 +, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> I would like to fix an important bug in libpng3. Below is the debdiff
> between the libpng/1.2.44-1 and -2. Is
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:09:33 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Unfortunately, previous patch was unsuccessful. The package contains
> no errors, but binaries can't be launched, because they do not see the
> main library. I updated the patch, correcting variable RPATH in cmake
> rules. Now the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 613433 pending
Bug #613433 [release.debian.org] pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-0.1
Added tag(s) pending.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613
tag 613433 pending
kthxbye
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:10:54 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51:29 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> The git package in stable is currently based against v1.7.2.3. Junio
> >> is conservative about not making
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 18:35 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I would like to enhance the "3G dongles" Squeeze experience by pushing a
> "targetted and secure backport" towards 6.0.1. The idea is not to let the new
> usb-modeswitch upstream version to migrate to Squeeze, rather to add
> suppo
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 09:46 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:45:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 22:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > | debian-reference (2.46) stable; urgency=low
> > > |
> > > | * Updated Portguese translation by Américo Monteiro
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 12:28 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I’d like to propose the proposed change for gedit.
>
> gedit (2.30.4-1squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
>
> * 10_pt_BR_po.patch: fix an important mistake in the Brazilian
> Portuguese translation. Closes: #603502.
>
> Is it OK for s
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 13:28 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> upstream receives a lot of the same crashes for the nautilus version in
> squeeze. It’s not easily reproducible but there’s a workaround that
> prevents that from happening and cannot harm.
>
> nautilus (2.30.1-2squeeze1) stable; urgency
Hi,
I noticed that you've uploaded a new upstream version of ruby1.9.1 to
stable, in order to fix CVE-2011-1004. Whilst it is great that you're
working on fixing this sort of issue in stable, uploading new upstream
versions is generally not appropriate, and certainly not without prior
discussion
2011/2/27 Thijs Kinkhorst :
> On Sunday 27 February 2011 15:49:28 Angel Abad wrote:
>> > Please upload the package to security-master then. Note that you need to
>> > change the target in the changelog and build the package with full source
>> > (-sa flag). Full checklist of packages for security-m
2011/2/26 Thijs Kinkhorst :
> Hi Angel,
>
> On Thursday 24 February 2011 12:27:21 Angel Abad wrote:
>> 2011/2/24 Adam D. Barratt :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, February 24, 2011 10:16, Angel Abad wrote:
>> >> I've prepared an upload to stable for package dajaxice, since
>> >> python-django was patche
On Sunday 27 February 2011 15:49:28 Angel Abad wrote:
> > Please upload the package to security-master then. Note that you need to
> > change the target in the changelog and build the package with full source
> > (-sa flag). Full checklist of packages for security-master is here:
> > http://www.deb
Hi,
upstream receives a lot of the same crashes for the nautilus version in
squeeze. It’s not easily reproducible but there’s a workaround that
prevents that from happening and cannot harm.
nautilus (2.30.1-2squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* 15_nautilus_file_peek_crash.patch: stolen from upstrea
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:38:54PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> gnome-screensaver 2.30.0-3 was for squeeze but didn’t make it in time.
> I’d like to re-upload it as a stable update.
>
> gnome-screensaver (2.30.0-2squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
>
> * Disable libnotify support, the function si
Hi,
gnome-screensaver 2.30.0-3 was for squeeze but didn’t make it in time.
I’d like to re-upload it as a stable update.
gnome-screensaver (2.30.0-2squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* Disable libnotify support, the function simply doesn’t work at all.
Closes: #606830.
Thanks,
--
.''`. J
Hi,
I’d like to propose the proposed change for gedit.
gedit (2.30.4-1squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
* 10_pt_BR_po.patch: fix an important mistake in the Brazilian
Portuguese translation. Closes: #603502.
Is it OK for squeeze?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave
45 matches
Mail list logo
