On ven., 2011-04-15 at 08:15 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I fully concur. Anyway this plugin doesn’t work for 3.0 either, for
> the moment.
Ok, it might make sense to disable it completely with
--disable-contacts-map (or whatever the option is called).
Josselin, could you take care of the upl
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Those are leafy gnome apps. I wonder if there is any real harm in
> holding them back for a while?
Yes.
Please stop this.
You're on the wrong track if you want to have a more secure testing by
blocking new versions from entering. For me CUT is about
Le vendredi 15 avril 2011 à 07:55 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> [ CC'ing explicitly Joss ]
>
> On 04/15/2011 07:43 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >
> > One solution (as indicated on irc) would be to upload as-is,
> > breaking the contact maps, since it's an experimental plugin and not
> > too
[ CC'ing explicitly Joss ]
On 04/15/2011 07:43 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> One solution (as indicated on irc) would be to upload as-is,
> breaking the contact maps, since it's an experimental plugin and not
> too much people seem to use it. That would be a temporary workaround
> until evolut
After trying --with-clutter as indicated on irc, it doesn't work either.
It FTBFS because it tries to use a function only present in clutter-gtk
1.0 (which is GTK+ 3). I've opened a GNOME bug
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647832) but in the meantime
I'm not too sure what to do.
One s
All the involved packages (except nipy), has been successfully rebuilt.
nipy will have to be either forced into testing or removed.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:18:42PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:34:55PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > I'd like to get your permission to upload to stable a fix for bug
> > #615060, which has been addressed by a patch provided by upstream, and
> > confirmed to work by b
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:34:55PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I'd like to get your permission to upload to stable a fix for bug
> #615060, which has been addressed by a patch provided by upstream, and
> confirmed to work by bug submitter.
Wow. ACK.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
D
Hi SRMs,
I'd like to get your permission to upload to stable a fix for bug
#615060, which has been addressed by a patch provided by upstream, and
confirmed to work by bug submitter.
I attach a debdiff of the proposed changes.
Thanks in advance,
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:10:37 +0200
with message-id <4da754bd.2030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#622807: transition: icedove
has caused the Debian Bug report #622807,
regarding transition: icedove
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
as I describe in [1], Icedove 3.1 is now in unstable waiting for
move into wheezy.
Could someone push the icedove/icedove-l10n packages into testing?
BTW: icedove-l10n-ka (Georgian)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 622279 with 618094 621932 621993 622001 622154 606681
Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults
Was blocked by: 616364
Added blocking bug(s) of 622279: 622154, 618094, 606681, 622001, 621932, and
621993
> thanks
Stopping
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnome-panel_3.0.0.1-1 . amd64 . -m "Build with newer libebook."
thanks
The system I built gnome-panel in had a too old libebook which broke
ABI meanwhile and the old ABI package is no l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 621101 + pending
Bug #621101 [release.debian.org] transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
On 06/04/2011 16:43, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I would like to coordinate reduction of BDB packages since I took the
unhappy job (as I could expect) to maintain BDB in Debian after Clint
have orphaned them.
I've added a page for libdb on the transition tracker so that we follow
the status of this tr
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:25:05 +0200
with message-id <4da6f5b1.9080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#622729: nmu: libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #622729,
regarding nmu: libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu hpsockd_0.17 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1
(Closes: #621104)"
nmu isync_1.0.4-2.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1
(Closes: #621106)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 621101 by 622712
Bug #621101 [release.debian.org] transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)
Was blocked by: 621427 621347 621417 621399 621403 621426 62 621382 621108
621366 621428 621425 621431 621419 621381 621404 621361 621413 621383 6214
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against current grass package"
dw grass_6.4.1-1 . ALL . -m "grass-dev (>= 6.4.1-1~)"
Qgis is still broken and needs updating, so ignore it.
--
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:13:35 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >It seems that the jabref and libpdfbox-java source packages don't
> >migrate to testing because they are waiting for each other.
> That's right. I added an easy hint and they should migrate later today.
Thanks alot!
Cheers,
gregor
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 618344 with 622655
Bug #618344 [release.debian.org] champlain 0.8 transition
Was blocked by: 622600
Added blocking bug(s) of 618344: 622655
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618344: http://bugs
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:31:51 +0200
with message-id <4da6a2e7.4090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#622714: nmu: etpan-ng_0.7.1-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622714,
regarding nmu: etpan-ng_0.7.1-5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 04/14/2011 01:55 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
It seems that the jabref and libpdfbox-java source packages don't
migrate to testing because they are waiting for each other.
That's right. I added an easy hint and they should migrate later today.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://doggu
23 matches
Mail list logo
