Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

2011-04-17 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, Could you please add some background information to < http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals > ? In my case, I am not sure if that wiki page is to make a wish or wishes that have already been agreed and granted. Some of you might know that there is an on-going effort to port Debian to A

Processed: block 618871 with 623165, block 622279 with 623165

2011-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 618871 with 623165 Bug #618871 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 618871: 623165 > block 622279 with 623165 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults Was blocked by

Bug#619988: transition: eglibc 2.13

2011-04-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:05:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Only four reverse-deps in the archive that have strict versioned deps on an > upstream version of eglibc due to private symbols: libnss-db, dante, libnih, > unscd. All leaf packages, currently up-to-date in testing, no entanglement

Bug#619988: transition: eglibc 2.13

2011-04-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Only four reverse-deps in the archive that have strict versioned deps on an upstream version of eglibc due to private symbols: libnss-db, dante, libnih, unscd. All leaf packages, currently up-to-date in testing, no entanglements with other current transitions. Other packages may pick up versione

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the > next > two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the > default > compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be man

Bug#623148: pu: package webkit/1.2.7-0+squeeze2

2011-04-17 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hey, I'm planning to upload the attached change to stable. It's a very simple change with a rather big benefit to webkit users (fixes #578019). Let me know if it's OK to go forward. Cheers, --

Re: Ispell transition

2011-04-17 Thread Robert Luberda
Mehdi Dogguy writes: Hi, > > ispell 3.3.02-4, currently staying in sid, Breaks several packages > providing an ispell-dictionary. While I'm sure you have good reasons to > do so, I do wonder if you already talked to other maintainers so that > they start updating their packages. Yes, I informed