Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Aron Xu wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
The patch doesn't look right:
man dh_pythonsupport
[...]
Appropriate dependencies on python-support, python and pythonX.Y are put
in
${python:Depends}. The
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 06:02:21 +
with message-id e1qri21-0008se...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625544,
regarding transition: imagemagick4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
reopen 625544
kthxbye
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:02:21 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
calibre (0.8.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild against libmagick 4. (Closes: #625544)
Err, no. #625544 is against release.debian.org, not calibre.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 625544
Bug #625544 {Done: Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: imagemagick4
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
kthxbye
reopen 625544
thanks
On 05/31/2011 08:15 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 06:02:21 +
with message-id e1qri21-0008se...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625544: fixed in calibre 0.8.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625544,
regarding
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 625544
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick4
Bug 625544 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
625544:
Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
[...]
+gwrite (0.3.0-2) stable; urgency=low
This version was already uploaded to unstable in the past.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello Medhi,
Mehdi Dogguy [2011-05-31 8:20 +0200]:
why are you closing this bug?
Sorry, copypaste fail. I meant to close #625556 (and did so now).
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu patchage_0.4.4-1.2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new flowcanvas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 10:33:30 +0200
with message-id 4de4a7da.9060...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#628663: nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #628663,
regarding nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- A grave problem when reconfiguring the package.
This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in
unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying the fix to
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached
debdiff).
Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless
there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
Hello.
Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go
from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for
a long time already, and the only problem found so far
has been fixed in subsequent upload.
It's a new upstream version upload, so the changes are
somewhat large for such a
On 2011年05月31日 14:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Aron Xu wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
The patch doesn't look right:
man dh_pythonsupport
[...]
Appropriate dependencies on python-support, python and
On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached
debdiff).
Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless
there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached
debdiff).
Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable.
Hi,
I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable:
apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
[ Sandro Tosi ]
* Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo
IGARASHI for the report and to Robert Luberda for the patch;
On 31/05/2011 13:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Hello.
Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go
from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for
a long time already, and the only problem found so far
has been fixed in subsequent upload.
It's a new upstream version upload,
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 17:16:58 +0200
with message-id 4de5066a.3080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime
has caused the Debian Bug report #624637,
regarding transition: libquicktime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hello,
A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a
rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0).
nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.'
nmu ocp_1:0.1.20-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.'
Thanks.
--
To
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 16:03 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable:
apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
[ Sandro Tosi ]
* Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:11 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- A grave problem when reconfiguring the package.
This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in
unstable
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 17:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:41 +, maximilian attems wrote:
* [klibc] ipconfig: comment new escape function
security fix for CVE-2011-0997 type vulnerability
corresponding cve
tag 628147 + pending
thanks
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 17:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Gaertner wrote:
retitle -1 slapcat gives unclean shutdown detected should be fixed in
stable
thanks
Hi,
Please consider #598361 for the next stable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 628147 + pending
Bug #628147 [release.debian.org] pu: openldap_2.4.23-7+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
628147:
On 05/31/2011 05:28 PM, Артём Попов wrote:
Hello,
A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a
rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0).
nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.'
Was this #553626 fixed?
nmu
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.23-7.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrv16-0008te...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
tags 626844 + pending
Bug #626844 [release.debian.org] pu: package
Processing changes file: apt-listchanges_2.85.7+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze0.1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rails_2.1.0-7+lenny0.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrabb-0002pb...@franck.debian.org
30 matches
Mail list logo
