what's the duty of wizards?

2011-07-10 Thread c-aries
Hi all! When I read the "Debian's Organizational Structure" at http://www.debian.org/intro/organization.en.html , I am confuse about the role "wizard". Just like below: Release Management -- * Release Team -- manager Adam D. Barratt manager Neil McGovern SRM

Bug#632800: pu: package opencv 2.1.0-3+squeeze1

2011-07-10 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, Adam. 2011/7/10 Adam D. Barratt : > tag 632800 + moreinfo squeeze > thanks > > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 10:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> I'd like to upload new version of opencv into s-p-u, which fixes optimization >> of the i386 architecture (#629414) and install path of opencv-doc (#610

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-07-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: asterisk_1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: asterisk_1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: asterisk_1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: asterisk_1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3_ia64.changes ACCE

[SRM] Stable update for libpcap

2011-07-10 Thread Romain Francoise
Hi, I'd like to upload the following update for libpcap in squeeze, it addresses two bugs: - #612803: device detection is broken if the bonding module is loaded because it creates an extra file in /sys/class/net, the upstream fix is used verbatim. - #623868 (aka CVE-2011-1935): a security issu

Bug#633486: transition: libdbi

2011-07-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, A new version of libdbi has been uploaded, which includes an ABI incompatibility with previous version, and an soname bump. (This ABI incompatibility was due to an unfortunate mistak

Bug#631007: pu: package arcboot/0.3.14+squeeze0

2011-07-10 Thread Guido Günther
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 05:27:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 19:04 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 04:11:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 19:18 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: [..snip..] > > > - Why was the "$(PRINT_LOA

Bug#633475: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1

2011-07-10 Thread Robert Millan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Due to an unfortunate oversight, the version of ifconfig that shipped with squeeze was shipped with its wireless support completely disabled (see bug #601803). I'm proposing this backport of the

Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16

2011-07-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:11:41 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Julien seems to favor getting a proper fix for VTK though, even if that > > would > > most likely mean to remove gdcm from testing for the time being. > > >

Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16

2011-07-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Julien seems to favor getting a proper fix for VTK though, even if that would > most likely mean to remove gdcm from testing for the time being. > > libreoffice: > LO ftbfs on mips(el). Rene believes this to be a buildd issue an

Bug#630044: transition: poppler 0.16

2011-07-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, here's a short update on the poppler transition: as can be seen on [1], all rdeps besides libreoffice (mips/el) and gdcm have been built and should be ready. gdcm: Even with [2] fixed, gdcm still ftbfs due to VTK being buggy wrt multiarch [3]. This can be temporarily worked around by binNMUi

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-07-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: brltty_4.2-7+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Processed: block 622279 with 633461, block 622279 with 632582 633457

2011-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Fails to install with Python 2.7 (but is needed for binNMUs): > gobject-introspection > block 622279 with 633461 Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 -> 2.7) Was blocked by: 628860 629085 628243

Re: test

2011-07-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 12:43 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:23:51PM +, Camaleón wrote: > > May I also ask if the idea of a 2-year fixed cycle freeze is still in > > place (is valid) or has been reviewed and then discarded? > > > > The current plan is that we will try

Re: test

2011-07-10 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:23:51PM +, Camaleón wrote: > May I also ask if the idea of a 2-year fixed cycle freeze is still in > place (is valid) or has been reviewed and then discarded? > The current plan is that we will try the fixed release date for the coming release, and see how it goes.

Re: [SRM] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

2011-07-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 00:02 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 09/07/2011 19:19, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > > Please go ahead; thanks. > > Uploaded, thanks! and flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia

Processed: tagging 633004

2011-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 633004 + pending Bug #633004 [release.debian.org] pu: package brltty/4.2-7+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b