Hi,
I've a hard time understanding what the current status of this
transition is. Anyone willing to sum up?
(I'm interested in it as it blocks #619602 - ITP: theunarchiver.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:35:39 +0200
with message-id 20110727173539.gc32...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#635543: RM: systemtap/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635543,
regarding RM: systemtap/1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# 4.6 and 4.7 are gone from wheezy
retitle 621101 transition: getting rid of libdb4.8
Bug #621101 [release.debian.org] transition: db (db4,6, db4.7, db4.8)
Changed Bug title to 'transition: getting rid of libdb4.8' from 'transition: db
(db4,6,
Hi.
I now notice that geogebra isn't migrating to testing, and I don't
understand why. [1] says that it would made geogebra-kde uninstallable,
but I really don't understand it: geogebra-kde just depends on any
version of geogebra.
[1]
On 2011-07-27 21:06, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Hi.
I now notice that geogebra isn't migrating to testing, and I don't
understand why. [1] says that it would made geogebra-kde uninstallable,
but I really don't understand it: geogebra-kde just depends on any
version of geogebra.
[1]
On 27/07/2011 21:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
As I recall, the issue is that geogebra now depends on the Icedtea Java
Plugin, which is not available on all architectures.
Thanks. Just to know: were I supposed to understand this from the error
I received (Updating geogebra makes 1 non-depending
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:23:50 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
On 27/07/2011 21:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
As I recall, the issue is that geogebra now depends on the Icedtea
Java
Plugin, which is not available on all architectures.
Thanks. Just to know: were I supposed to understand this from
Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote:
clone 635382 -1
retitle 635382 latex-unicode sources and licensing
severity 635382 serious
thanks
Thank you for your work.
So I'm out of ideas how to find the real sources.
Given that the true sources seem to have disappeared,
Hm, just
Hi,
Conky currently has an open issue [1] on the security tracker for
stable and oldstable, but the security team has decided that it's not
important enough for a DSA, so I would like to ask if the release team
could upload fixed conky packages directly to stable/oldstable
instead. A patch
9 matches
Mail list logo