Hi Scott
On 08/02/2011 05:39 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> As the drafter of the proposed release goal for Python [1], I will confess
> some surprise when I read on d-d-a [2] that this had been dropped for Wheezy
> without being involved any discussion or at least notification. Regardless,
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 622363 with 633973
Bug #622363 [release.debian.org] transition: libnotify 0.7
Was blocked by: 630300 630266 630281 630294 630265 630302 630283 619874 630312
630277 630307 630279 630295 630298 630289 630264 630311 630278 630272 630263
63028
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:57:21PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mo, 01 Aug 2011, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Please don't overreact. Upstream has a fine mechanism to record
>> licenses of packages and even individual files, and all we need to do is
> Individual packages, yes, individual files,
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 06:56 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> it looks like devhelp/anjuta/glade(-3) needs some help to get into testing.
>
> seed/epiphany-browser need some hand holding too.
> epiphany-extensions-more is currently not installable with epiphany-brower 3.0
> from unstable.
> Please rem
Hi,
it looks like devhelp/anjuta/glade(-3) needs some help to get into testing.
seed/epiphany-browser need some hand holding too.
epiphany-extensions-more is currently not installable with epiphany-brower 3.0
from unstable.
Please remove it from testing for the time being. It needs more time to
i
On Mo, 01 Aug 2011, Frank Küster wrote:
> Please don't overreact. Upstream has a fine mechanism to record
> licenses of packages and even individual files, and all we need to do is
Individual packages, yes, individual files, no.
> to find someone with write access to The Catalogue (like you or m
As the drafter of the proposed release goal for Python [1], I will confess
some surprise when I read on d-d-a [2] that this had been dropped for Wheezy
without being involved any discussion or at least notification. Regardless,
it's the release team's call, so it's gone.
I'm somewhat unsure
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 22:48 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in
> 3.0
> > branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
> > there's much support on t
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in 3.0
> branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
> there's much support on that, and especially not on --enable-gtk3=yes.
>
> I'll try a bit m
On 08/01/2011 08:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
>> e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus
>> way to handle it.
>>
> Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to "handle" it at
> all.
Why could
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>> 1) Include that license in debian/copyright, document which part it
>> applies to.
>
> Just to make one thing clear. *I* will not go down this road. I will
> *never* collect the license statements 15000+ files.
[...]
> I take the license statement o
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 19:35 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> As added on #630268, evolution 3.0 works with libnotify 0.7 but it needs
> libgdata from experimental, not sure if it's supposed to happen soon (I
> didn't really touch 3.x branch at all). I can try to build evolution
> 2.32 against lib
[CCing yada maintainer, to avoid going behind his back with this]
I would like to propose a release goal for wheezy of removing yada from Debian:
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RemoveYada
While accepting that this may attract some controversy, and while
supporting the principle that package
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:20:11 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Julien,
>
> am Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 08:19:42PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > This has been sitting in git for a while now (I'd actually forgotten
> > about this), but we may want to fix it anyway.
>
> please go ahead.
>
Up
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:37:43 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Binary_NMUs for ubuntus
> way to handle it.
>
Well. Ubuntu doesn't have binNMUs, so they don't have to "handle" it at
all.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
On sam., 2011-07-30 at 23:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> tag 622363 pending
> kthxbye
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
> >
> Let's go ahead with this.
>
As added on #630268, evo
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:52:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Please consider in advance the attached patch. Happily, atop has the same
> version in all suites, so it can simply be applied to all of them. The
> unstable NMU is currently lurking in a delayed queue.
sorry, here it is :)
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please consider in advance the attached patch. Happily, atop has the same
version in all suites, so it can simply be applied to all of them. The
uns
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [110801 15:32]:
> this comes from a private conversation which actually shouldn't be
> private (redistributing with permission from Phil). So following up in
> public now.
And for context (thanks, Niels, for the hint): This is about "what
happens with multiar
Hi,
this comes from a private conversation which actually shouldn't be
private (redistributing with permission from Phil). So following up in
public now.
* Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org) [110801 13:25]:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:29:20PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Andreas Barth (a...@n
If I get an ack from SRM i'll do the krb5 upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/tsllivd472o@mit.edu
On 2011-07-21 14:22, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:25 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2011-07-20 22:02, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> CC'ing the FlightGear maintainers... I should have done in the first
>> email. For the newcomers, the thread
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 636150 + lenny confirmed
Bug #636150 [release.debian.org] opu: package xorg-server/2:1.4.2-10.lenny4
Added tag(s) confirmed and lenny.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636150: http://bugs.debia
Julien,
am Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 08:19:42PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> This has been sitting in git for a while now (I'd actually forgotten
> about this), but we may want to fix it anyway.
please go ahead.
Thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 622146 nfs-kernel-server,src:krb5
found 622146 nfs-kernel-server/1:1.2.2-4
found 622146 src:krb5/1.8.3+dfsg-4
fixed 622146 nfs-kernel-server/1:1.2.4-1
fixed 622146 src:krb5/1.9.1+dfsg-1
tags 622146 patch
thanks
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I don't have ch
25 matches
Mail list logo
