On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I generally agree with the idea that something cross-distro would be
better, and hence xdg-su would be the best solution, but if they're not
willing to use anything other than PolicyKit, that seems like a
showstopper there.
On 06/08/2011 08:19 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
GNUstep development in
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
I guess we could do this when libnotify's done.
OK, thank you!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5
Hi,
Looking at:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html
There is a few updates for armel;
buildds: 5
- arcadelt and argento are no longer in use
buildd redundancy: partial
- 1 in different location but would struggle to keep up alone
buildd-dsa: yes
- All armel buildd are under
Hello,
I'll make a new package and publish it again at the same location,
signed this time.
I've just uploaded a fixed version for review.
Thanks,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Message transféré
De: Thomas Girard thomas.g.gir...@free.fr
À: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Cc: pkg-ace-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Sujet: Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:20:57 +0200
Hello,
I'll make a new package and
* Riku Voipio (riku.voi...@iki.fi) [110815 11:42]:
buildds: 5
- arcadelt and argento are no longer in use
buildd redundancy: partial
- 1 in different location but would struggle to keep up alone
buildd-dsa: yes
- All armel buildd are under DSA control
fixed.
Andi
--
To
On 2011-08-12 22:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
tag 637384 + confirmed
thanks
[...]
Nah, I just forgot there were any test cases that I'd actually bothered
doing that with.
Please feel free to upload.
Regards,
Adam
Done. :)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which
sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus (which is
far from trivial).
I'd rather just
Am 15.08.2011 22:26, schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 20:31 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
The alternative is to backport the necessary changes in g-s-d (which
sounds insane) or to re-add the necessary support in nautilus (which is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu tiff_3.9.5-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libjpeg8
Currently, linking using both -ltiff and -ljpeg produces a warning:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libjpeg.so.62, needed by
11 matches
Mail list logo
