On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> the way that excuses are generated means that either of these
> forms are possible:
>
> foo Depends: bar
> foo/amd64 Depends: bar
>
> but "foo[/amd64] Depends: bar/amd64" will never be output. With that in
> mind, I suspect we could dro
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or
Saturday.
This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the
FTBFS on mips & mipsel.
There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing changes file: usbutils_0.87-5squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qwld6-fm...@franck.debian.org
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> After a certain amount of head-desking when various things didn't work,
> I'm finally happy enough with my improved auto-hinter functionality for
> britney that I thought it should be in the BTS for others to pull
> apart^W^Wcomment on.
+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Tags: patch
Hi,
After a certain amount of head-desking when various things didn't work,
I'm finally happy enough with my improved auto-hinter functionality for
britney that I thought it s
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
> > > want to stay in compatible mod
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
> > want to stay in compatible mode until we could implement something like
> > the opt-in model.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
> > (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
> > libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 19:42:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The key question is whether we think it's enough of an issue that we
> want to stay in compatible mode until we could implement something like
> the opt-in model.
>
I'd say turn off compatible mode, and see if that ends up being an
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 21:57:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Obsolete binary packages in a configurable list of archive sections
[...]
> are not automatically removed when the source package is
> > updated; instead they are kept in te
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes we
> just need to rebuild on a single architecture (because something
> strange has happend there), and I don't want to get rid of that
> ability.
>
The more I think
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
> Torsten Werner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
> >
> > I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
>
> What's the status of the free JVMs wrt JDBC4?
>
Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
>> rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ?
>
> I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question
What's the status of the free JVMs wrt JDBC4?
I know firsthand that JDBC4 doesn't work with OpenJDK6 while it works
flawlessl
We just uploaded a new upstream to exp. Thus, no need to binNMU there
any more.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ub
14 matches
Mail list logo
