Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-10-21 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Philipp, Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern: Or it's the removal of the package. we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-10-21 Thread Florian Weimer
* Moritz Muehlenhoff: As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK): http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/ If anyone remembers the rationale behind the DLJ, perhaps they can check if the current BCL matches our needs, too?

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#646095: midori (libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.61-2): symbol lookup error: midori: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text

2011-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 646095 release.debian.org Bug #646095 [midori] midori (libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.61-2): symbol lookup error: midori: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text Bug reassigned from package 'midori' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug No

Processed: your mail

2011-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 630201 pending Bug #630201 [release.debian.org] transition: liblzma 5 Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 630201:

Re: Debconf11 multiarch-related-items meeting notes

2011-10-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:17:22AM +0100, Wookey wrote: likely partial arches: i686, ppc64, sparc64, s390x, mips64, arm/x86 optimisations? ABI-comptible optimisations are not the same as ABI-incompatible. But could be treated the same way. FWIW I disagree with s390x being a candidate for a

Processed: Re: Bug#637331: transition: GNOME 3

2011-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 637331 transition: GNOME 3 Bug #637331 [release.debian.org] transition: nautilus Changed Bug title to 'transition: GNOME 3' from 'transition: nautilus' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Re: Bug#637331: transition: GNOME 3

2011-10-21 Thread Michael Biebl
retitle 637331 transition: GNOME 3 thanks Am 17.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a slot to start the nautilus 3

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hey, This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are you sure it did? It was removed here: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/88621 I can add a work-around to webkit if required, but I'd prefer to have

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are you sure it did?

Re: tzdata update for (old)stable and lenny-volatile

2011-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 09:04 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:49:50AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have uploaded version 2011l-0squeeze1 of tzdata

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-21 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we fixed through p-u. And an input fix to use 64bit arithmetic to avoid overflows with high resolution devices, that's

Archive inclusion request for s390x

2011-10-21 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi there, we — the s390x porters — deem the s390x port[0] on debian-ports ready for inclusion into the archive and hereby request this. Please tell us how to get forward with this. Are machines available to general public? Does it have any users? If an embedded system are there real systems

Bug#637331: transition: GNOME 3

2011-10-21 Thread Julien Cristau
[please keep sending mail to the bug, not the list directly.] On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 16:59:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Since python-gnomeapplet has been dropped, we should possibly update the transition tracker to also track those packages. Not really sure that belongs in the tracker (or

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 14:22:00 -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being used in the test

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori ( 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up, by the sound of it. midori has a guard for this, see

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:24:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori ( 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up, by the sound of it.

Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol

2011-10-21 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: That code should be killed, not #if !WEBKIT_CHECK_VERSION (1, 4, 3) I've asked on upstream bug about that, but I'm not sure it's that trivial nor really important. That code has been present and working in multiple midori versions