On ven., 2011-10-21 at 23:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Anyway, let's see the upstream call on that.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/799603/comments/16
and I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the guard and the “else”
part. One thing I can do is add a versioned build-dep for
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now
and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to
pursue this goal for wheezy.
Given
Hi Guillem,
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring
further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to
experimental on sunday (October 23th).
Hi,
FYI claws-mail-fancy-plugin is also affected by this, when trying to
load the plugin, I get:
/usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined symbol:
webkit_web_view_get_selected_text
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 646095 libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.6.1-2
Bug #646095 [release.debian.org] nmu: midori_0.4.1-
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'libwebkitgtk-1.0-0'.
Bug #646095 [libwebkitgtk-1.0-0] nmu: midori_0.4.1-
Bug Marked as found in
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and
I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.12 release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the Wheezy Bug Squashing Party (BSP) Marathon[0] will commence with a BSP
in Hildesheim, Germany from December 2nd to December 4th. The party will
be hosted in the office of Pengutronix e. K.[1]
For further details please have a look at the
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
5 packages need binNMUs for libhangul 0.1.0 transition:
nmu imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1
dw imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m libhangul-dev (= 0.1.0-1)
nmu
As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a
packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released
with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and
shorewall6-lite in Sid. I have already fixed the latest version in the
git repository
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I have
attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the
update. The first file would be included in shorewall and
shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite.
I cleverly forgot
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 637809 with 646286
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 636132 640346 636762
638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 628501 634141
628500
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 637809 with 646295
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 636132 640346
638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503 636656 628501
634141
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 637809 with 646297
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 646286 646295 636132
640346 636762 638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656
628501
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 637809 with 646299
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 646297 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 640346
646295 636132 638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503
636656
14 matches
Mail list logo
