Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, I can't let this without answer. On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote: You could also make a case from a terminological perspective as well. Unstable is where development in Debian is supposed to happen, so it's perfectly acceptable to upload unfinished/unstable changes. No, sorry.

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-30 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote: You could also make a case from a terminological perspective as well. Unstable is where development in Debian is supposed to happen, so it's perfectly acceptable to upload unfinished/unstable

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 646156 + pending thanks On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze thanks On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we fixed through p-u. And an input fix

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 22:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more testing of the current SVN on more machines, and everything seems fine around the release of

Re: 3.x kernels fix for the stable module-init-tools

2011-10-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 03:30 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Please approve the updated module-init-tools package, the trivial patch comes from upstream and has been in testing for months. Whilst it would have been appreciated if you'd mailed before uploading, the patch looks obvious enough. Flagged

Bugs in stable c-ares package

2011-10-30 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello, I have a question regarding the c-ares package (a library to query the DNS) bug #607438. The bug report has a patch attached. But browsing the upstream repository shows many fixes since v1.7.3. How should I go on here? I see three options: 1) Update stable version with the single

Re: [SRM] Uploading new upstream stable version to Squeeze?

2011-10-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 22:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more testing of the current SVN

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-10-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: phpldapadmin_1.2.0.5-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xorg-server_1.7.7-14_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: module-init-tools_3.12-2_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a