Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to get #651621 fixed in squeeze. jabberbot has a
race-condition on connect where it sets up its callbacks before setting
up the data they need. The bug has been fixed in 0.11
Hi,
libvte9 had incorrect shlibs information which lead to dependencies not
being strict enough [1].
I've uploaded a fixed package in the mean time and checked which rdeps
of libvte use the new API.
I'd appreciate if you could schedule binNMUs fro the following packages,
so they pick up the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
17:18 jwilk Why does http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_policy.html talk
about lenny?
17:18 adsb probably for the same reason the squeeze one does, namely no-one
noticed it was wrong
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:31:13 +0100
with message-id 20111212193113.gp2...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#651853:
http://release.debian.org/{squeeze,wheezy}/arch_policy.html talks about lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #651853,
regarding
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 634797 + pending
Bug #634797 [release.debian.org] opencv 2.3 transition
Added tag(s) pending.
block 634797 with 651872
Bug #634797 [release.debian.org] opencv 2.3 transition
Was blocked by: 631822 634796
Added blocking bug(s) of 634797:
tag 651808 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 10:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I'd like to get #651621 fixed in squeeze. jabberbot has a
race-condition on connect where it sets up its callbacks before setting
up the data they need. The bug has been fixed in 0.11 upstream, so
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 651808 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #651808 [release.debian.org] pu: package jabberbot/0.9-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651808:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 17:13 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
libvte9 had incorrect shlibs information which lead to dependencies not
being strict enough [1].
I've uploaded a fixed package in the mean time and checked which rdeps
of libvte use the new API.
I'd appreciate if you could schedule
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:07:37 +
with message-id 1323727657.28289.20.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#649845: binNMU request for proftpd addon modules
has caused the Debian Bug report #649845,
regarding binNMU request for proftpd addon modules
to be
Hi all,
Le dimanche 11 décembre 2011 17:25:41, Holger Levsen a écrit :
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote:
the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute
the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently?
I believe inside an organisation I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
The security team asked us to consider an upload to pu fixing 2 low severity
security issues (which don't warrant a DSA).
Attached a debdiff of the proposed upload.
Cheers
Luk
diff -Nru
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 19:27 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Did the 2.11.4 release happen? I'm conscious of the fact that we're now
a little way past 6.0.3; apologies for not following up again sooner.
I have asked for it, but
Hi,
Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point
release would be due in early February.
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the release of squeeze) it
makes sense to schedule 5.0.10 to be
Hi,
Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
be due around mid-January.
We may want to adjust timings a little, so that we don't end up trying
to set deadlines for things like kernel and d-i changes being ready over
the holiday period.
As an opening gambit, I'd
14 matches
Mail list logo
