Adam D. Barratt [2011-12-15 19:23 +]:
> You only saw minor to mid-sized problems? ;-)
Only XS ones :) More seriously, I didn't hear about regressions on the
upstream bug lists, nor in the Debian/Ubuntu bug trackers, so I can
only assume that it's by and large working.
> Please go ahead; thank
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 639871 !
Bug #639871 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp
Owner recorded as Niels Thykier .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63
[If you're going to set reply-to in order to not get CCed on replies,
please consider not CCing others on your own follow-ups]
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 23:01 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 10:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > For the record, I did not forget. I was under the impression
On 12/15/2011 10:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> For the record, I did not forget. I was under the impression that what
> you'd previously requested, and what we had agreed, was that you wished
> to be copied on the mails announcing the dates of the point releases,
no; i said it numerous times al
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
> > be due around mid-January.
>
> again and again, you forget to cc debian-live. this is going on for too
> long al
On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
> be due around mid-January.
again and again, you forget to cc debian-live. this is going on for too
long already, fix this, finally, i'm getting sick of it.
> As an opening ga
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
I've just pushed a patch to britney which automatically removes obsolete
source packages from testing. These will still be in unstable
(otherwise they'd have been removed via that route in
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:46:27 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
> this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
> Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
> through
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:36 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> PostgreSQL published new microreleases ten days ago:
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1366/
>
> I didn't see any regression report or major problem with these so far,
You only saw minor to mid-sized problems? ;-)
> so it's time to get
Dear porters,
maybe this fell under the table, as phrixos seems to be new, but the
haskell-xss-sanitize_0.3.0.1-1+b1 build is stuck in the Built state:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-xss-sanitize
Dear release team,
once this package is uploaded, I believe that all waiting
Hi
2011/12/14 Stefano Zacchiroli :
> If you do so, please be aware that it might be a slippery slope. In
> particular, please keep in mind that Debian has an ethical position on
> Free Software, but has no ethical position on topics like ecology,
> economy, world peace, religion, etc.
I agree wit
Hello Debian release team,
PostgreSQL published new microreleases ten days ago:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1366/
I didn't see any regression report or major problem with these so far,
so it's time to get them into stables. They pass both the upstream
regression tests as well as the exte
Hi
Sorry, here is the corrected debdiff for the libpar-packer-perl.
Regards
Salvatore
diff -Nru libpar-packer-perl-1.006/debian/changelog libpar-packer-perl-1.006/debian/changelog
--- libpar-packer-perl-1.006/debian/changelog 2010-06-28 18:17:16.0 +0200
+++ libpar-packer-perl-1.006/debian
13 matches
Mail list logo
