On 03/01/12 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
(fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of
which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck
behind them).
Hi,
FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the default version of Ruby in
wheezy. It scares me
On 04.01.2012 07:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/01/12 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
(fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of
which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck
behind them).
Hi,
FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:41:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the default version of Ruby in
wheezy. It scares me a bit that you want to include armhf in testing
when ruby1.9.1 doesn't build on armhf because the test suite segfaults
(#652674).
We are
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:24 AM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
(fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of
which have a number of other
On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
please reject it for now.
After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we
discussed whether
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable later this week, once upstream
stable update 3.1.8 is released.
Linux 3.2 is also likely to be released very soon, but I think we still
have some work to do on updating the configuration for it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Make three consecutive correct
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:48:27AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt:
Apologies if I'm missing something, but if the packages are already in
the queue on security-master, wouldn't it be simpler (and possibly more
logical) to release them from there? Hmmm, looking at the
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:32:10 +0100
with message-id 4f047f0a.6010...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#654461: nmu: usb-modeswitch_1.2.1+repack0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #654461,
regarding nmu: usb-modeswitch_1.2.1+repack0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
* Philipp Kern:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:48:27AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt:
Apologies if I'm missing something, but if the packages are already in
the queue on security-master, wouldn't it be simpler (and possibly more
logical) to release them from there? Hmmm,
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org schrieb:
Why is that, given that according to the tracker, lenny isn't even
affected? I'd appreciate a fix for a remote DoS of a network service
through security, to be honest.
For all practical purposes the KDC is local to your trust context.
Cheers,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:37:36PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org schrieb:
Why is that, given that according to the tracker, lenny isn't even
affected? I'd appreciate a fix for a remote DoS of a network service
through security, to be honest.
For all
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 06:58 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I now uploaded ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk for squeeze and ia32-libs for
lenny. I've added proposed-updates to the lenny sources but I don't think
that in this specific iteration it made any difference.
Thanks. I've accepted the lenny
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:37:36PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
For all practical purposes the KDC is local to your trust context.
For all practical purposes you also have it open so that your
roadwarriors can get tickets.
Indeed, it's possible that
13 matches
Mail list logo
