Hi,
On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
0.1-7+squeeze1 would be more conventional :-) but please go ahead;
uploaded as 0.1-7+squeeze1.
thanks.
likewise! :-)
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing changes file: squid3_3.1.6-1.2+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: squid3_3.1.6-1.2+squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: squid3_3.1.6-1.2+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: squid3_3.1.6-1.2+squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
do the live images) are fine for me.
The 28th would be preferable for me. Would that still work for everyone
Processing changes file: ldap2zone_0.1-7+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python3-defaults_3.1.3-12+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
bugzilla had another two security updates that we should consider for stable,
they are no-dsa.
Debdiff attached, the unconventional version is a historical relic.
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libafflib0_3.6.6-1.1 . i386 . -m Rebuild to avoid linking against
libreadline libncurses and (GPL incompatible) libssl (Ref: #645915)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 11:22 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
0.1-7+squeeze1 would be more conventional :-) but please go ahead;
uploaded as 0.1-7+squeeze1.
For the record, this was accepted earlier today and has already built on
all
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday, January 05, 2012 09:57:58 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 17:56 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'd like to upload a fix for 651437 as a stable update:
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:14:40 +
with message-id 1325956480.13341.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#654977: nmu: libafflib0_3.6.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #654977,
regarding nmu: libafflib0_3.6.6-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 653228 with 653823
Bug #653228 [src:boost-defaults] boost-defaults: libboost-*-dev 1.48.0.2 depend
on libboost-*1.46-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 653228: 653823
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Re: Moritz Mühlenhoff 2012-01-05 20120105182845.GA3882@pisco.westfalen.local
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:00:43AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Moritz Muehlenhoff 2012-01-04 20120104171956.ga4...@inutil.org
Can you also assess whether (old)stable are affected, and if so,
provide
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 19:49 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Found them on the notebook. I've just uploaded them to ftp-master.
Release team: please consider including them in the next (old)stable
update.
It would have been appreciated if you could have sent debdiffs first, as
per the Dev Ref
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_83-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_83-4+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_83-4+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_83-4+squeeze1_ia64.changes
Hi,
I am sponsor of ordereddict package.
On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which
is a
backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock
python2.7.
please reject it for now.
After switching python-defaults to
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I had been planning on having a look at the situation for both armhf and
s390x over the period between Christmas and New Year, but for a variety
of reasons that never happened. It's still on my short-term to-do list;
it's not quite as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu totem_3.2.1-2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libgdata 0.10
Please rebuild totem from experimental against libgdata for the
libgdata11 → libgdata13 soname bump.
-- System Information:
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org (08/01/2012):
nmu totem_3.2.1-2 . ALL . -m rebuild against libgdata 0.10
Please rebuild totem from experimental against libgdata for the
libgdata11 → libgdata13 soname bump.
FWIW: from experimental → -d experimental in your line.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Please requeue the binnmus of osptoolkit on all architectures except
armhf and s390x (which don't need a binnmu because they first built
the package after the openssl transition).
The previous binnmu attempt failed due to a linker issue, however
based on a combination of local testing and the
Hi.
(This should have gone to -wb-team, but let's process that anyway.)
peter green plugw...@p10link.net (08/01/2012):
Please requeue the binnmus of osptoolkit on all architectures except
armhf and s390x (which don't need a binnmu because they first built
the package after the openssl
Hi,
JFYI:
Matthias Klose wrote:
see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2 packagers
is
outstanding.
There's one issue which is not listed there but into
An initial push of packages to testing occurred with tonight's britney
run. There's a certain amount of uninstallability and loads of missing
packages still, but it's a start :)
I guess the next step is to try and get it to the point where it is
bootstrapable.
When I tried to bootstrap it
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
Hi,
JFYI:
Matthias Klose wrote:
see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2
packagers is
outstanding.
22 matches
Mail list logo
