Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.21.2-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.21.2-1+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.21.2-1+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.21.2-1+lenny1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing change
Processing changes file: kolab_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rklaj-0002y5...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.22-8+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.22-8+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.22-8+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pdns_2.9.22-8+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing change
2012/1/10 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>If the bug is critical, I'm surprised that no-one appears to have filed
>it in the BTS by now.
Maybe there are just too few apps in Squeeze that utilizes serialization
functionality of json-glib.
>Could you provide a little more information about
>which upstream
Processing changes file:
openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_source+i386+amd64+all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny12_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openof
Processing changes file:
openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_source+i386+amd64+armel+all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_3.2.1-11+squeeze4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Hi, all.
2012/1/11 Bernd Zeimetz :
> On 01/10/2012 08:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 17:42:04 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
I just upload.
Sorry, reply was late.
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering if you've tried to build the
>>> build-reverse-dependencies a
Hi!
Yes, that would work for me.
* Adam D. Barratt [120110 22:33]:
> press@, -live - ping?
>
> > > > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> > > > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
> > > 21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
>
On 01/10/2012 10:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The 28th would be preferable for me. Would that still work for everyone
> else?
2011-01-28 (and the day afterwards) is fine, yes.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologi
press@, -live - ping?
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> > > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21
On 01/10/2012 08:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 17:42:04 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I just upload.
>>> Sorry, reply was late.
>>
>> I'm just wondering if you've tried to build the
>> build-reverse-dependencies against the new library and/or if you've
>> not
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> here is another hint that britney2 seemingly did not detect by
> itself:
added to my hint file. Thanks.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 17:42:04 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just upload.
> > Sorry, reply was late.
>
> I'm just wondering if you've tried to build the
> build-reverse-dependencies against the new library and/or if you've
> notified the maintainers of these packages (if so I've mi
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-2+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-2+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-2+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: super_3.30.0-2+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fil
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
At http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=mdbtools it's
possible to see this:
"mdbtools depends on automake >= 1:1.10 but testing has 1:1.4-p6-13.1
(unstable has 1:1.11.1-1)"
But actually we have an automake source package version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 655158 + pending
Bug #655158 [release.debian.org] pu: base-installer & libdebian-installer:
Power 7 support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655158: http://bugs.debian.org
tag 655158 + pending
thanks
On 09.01.2012 22:00, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:09:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 22:25 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Debian Squeeze is currently not installable on Power 7 based IBM
> pSeries, unless the Power 6 comp
Hi!
Am 09.01.2012 20:02, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Personally, I'd like to know what the reasoning is for
> 1) a mass bug filing without prior debian-devel discussion
> 2) seemingly deciding that tarballs aren't source
Let me start by answering 2) first: We are not talking about tarballs
here.
Processing changes file: base-installer_1.115+squeeze1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdebian-installer_0.77+squeeze3_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_68-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_68-1+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_68-1+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_68-1+lenny1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
P
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: opensaml2_2.3-2+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processin
In a previous life, on 11.09.2011 02:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
>> next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
>> but some of the bugs are very annoyi
22 matches
Mail list logo