I'm ready to move from working on unstable processing now to dependency
resolution for testing in Emdebian. We only have 10% of the packages in
Debian and I'll automate the process of adding packages to our list
when a package we already include gains a dependency which isn't
currently in the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 23:36:27 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:27:21 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Yes, random/3 was never called outside ssh_bits module. The patch not
only unexports it
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 23:36:27 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
Does it make sense to upload into oldstable also?
I'm not sure it's worth it at this point, with oldstable being EOL in
less than a month.
Okay then.
--
[added the KDE bug and -release to Cc]
Hi,
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 09:18 +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Please, if possible, exclude konqueror-nsplugins from the default
KDE install in 6.0.4.
It crashes as soon as user enters any flash-enabled website. (www.amd.com)
Very ugly user experience.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:55:10 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step?
On http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/maradns I
see three issues: CVE-2011-5055, CVE-2011-5056 and CVE-2012-0024. Which
one is this fixing, and what's
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 20:54 -0700, John Wright wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:18:14PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 19:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've rejected the current package. Please feel free to upload a new
version without the cruft; thanks.
[...]
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 06:32 +0100, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote:
I have recently fixed a bug [1] in slbackup which prevents it from
running due to a typo in a config-file. The diff is minimal (attached),
and I have prepared a
tag 654442 + squeeze pending
thanks
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:39 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Alright, please go ahead with the upload then.
Done.
Flagged for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 654442 + squeeze pending
Bug #654442 [release.debian.org] pu: package erlang/14.a-dfsg-3squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
654442:
I reckon there must be some confusion here. The description in
CVE-2011-5056 does not match the link to Sam's blog. SO I have no idea
what is going on there. In any case if the attack vector is crafting
authoritative DNS records, then the system would have to be compromised
in other ways to make
Processing changes file: erlang_14.a-dfsg-3squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: slbackup_0.0.12-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-debian_0.1.18+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hallo,
I think I stop now working on the boost-related topics,
because, well, I am running out bugs now ;-)
Please see the updated list:
Category FIX KNOWN:
avogadro #653625 [moc] -- submitted patch
fgrun #652775 [see #652788] -- see simgear
flightgear #652797 [see #652788] - see
Dear Release Team,
Thanks to the hard work of Tobias, all known build failures related to
Boost 1.48 are either pending or have a patch readily available.
Is there anything further you need me to do before flipping
the Boost Default and closing this bug?
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
As before, the proposed changes are only in
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 17:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:04 PM, in #655517, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
When using version 1.10 or later of libcairo2 (e.g. from
mozilla.debian.net's squeeze-backports repository), gimp 2.6.10's
print and print preview are broken.
In
tag 655763 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:54 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I would like to get a one-line security fix for mediawiki (again) into the
next point release, it is a no-dsa.
It has only today reached unstable so I'm happy to wait a few days first, tg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 655763 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #655763 [release.debian.org] pu: package mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze2
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655763:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 11:42 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit
r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that
as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the
Stable Release Team first what
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 02:36 +0400, Anton Olkhovik wrote:
2012/1/10 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Could you provide a little more information about
which upstream version the fix was included in, and applications
which are affected?
I noticed this problem while testing new versions of my game
On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
As
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Something odd appears to have happened to CVE-2011-4602.patch; it looks
like a diff of a brokenly wrapped diff. For instance: (sic)
Strange, but it actually doesn't affect the patch, and
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 20:23 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ * Fix checkarray script so that it does not die after scheduling the
first
+device when there is no scheduling class specified; thanks to Mario
+'BitKoenig' Holbe (closes:
tag 652545 + pending
thanks
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 18:46 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Interesting question. I was indeed convinced that the patch made its
way to 3.6 but it apparently
tag 655763 + pending
thanks
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 16:04 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:54 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I would like to get a one-line security fix for mediawiki (again) into the
next point release, it is a no-dsa.
It has only today reached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 652545 + pending
Bug #652545 [release.debian.org] pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652545:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 655763 + pending
Bug #655763 [release.debian.org] pu: package mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze2
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655763:
Processing changes file: mediawiki_1.15.5-2squeeze3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rm8a4-00034i...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Upstream for libupnp has changed the soname for the stable branch from
libupnp3 to libupnp6, as a result of the ABI changes in version 1.6 over
the last few years.
As the
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:43:34 -0500
with message-id
CANTw=MOoeAAV_2UOdi=7=_EhJiUh=9vq15c6bh7owxkxxyw...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: RM: amsn/0.98.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #653881,
regarding RM: amsn/0.98.4-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 651897 + pending
Bug #651897 [release.debian.org] pu: package cifs-utils/2:4.5-2+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651897:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 650993 + pending
Bug #650993 [release.debian.org] pu: package masqmail/0.2.27-1.1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
650993:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 640922 + pending
Bug #640922 [release.debian.org] pu: package eglibc/2.11.2-10 (Was: Bug#639897:
Please don't check /proc/mounts)
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640922:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 652015 + pending
Bug #652015 [release.debian.org] pu: package iotop/0.4-2
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652015: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652015
To add even more confusion:
I did a final tweak to the hash compression function yesterday.
TL;DR summary: Use MaraDNS 1.3.07.14, 1.4.10, any 2.0 release, or
apply this patch to an older release of MaraDNS:
http://maradns.org/download/patches/maradns-1.3-better_hash.patch
Long summary:
I made
On Saturday 14 January 2012 12:18:19 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[added the KDE bug and -release to Cc]
Hi,
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 09:18 +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Please, if possible, exclude konqueror-nsplugins from the default
KDE install in 6.0.4.
Afaik, there is no bugs in
This is getting a bit tedious but we have a clarification:
http://woodlane.webconquest.com/pipermail/list/2012-January/001050.html
On 14/01/12 12:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:55:10 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step?
On
On 01/14/2012 11:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks. Would it be possible to have an updated diff without the cruft?
New patch attached.
(fwiw, I'm also not quite sure what some other parts of that patch have
to do with fixing the crash; e.g.
The patch was taken directly from the
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'd like to see a debdiff for a final ack, but from the description
provided this sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point
release.
Adam, thank you for your reply. Not quite a debdiff but I suppose
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release.
I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since
a member of the release team needs to either ACK or reject this anyhow I
thought we might as well do it on the
39 matches
Mail list logo
