On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Any chance you could consider an upload with *just* the above change
(and a changelog entry), and without the version change noise in the
rest of your diff?
I could do this but the other two functional changes, although not
affecting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 634797 with 652759 654619 653799
Bug #634797 [release.debian.org] opencv 2.3 transition
Was blocked by: 631822 651872 634796
Added blocking bug(s) of 634797: 654619, 652759, and 653799
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:15:41 +0100
with message-id 20120115101541.ge9...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#649339: vtk 5.8 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #649339,
regarding vtk 5.8 transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
tags 648775 + pending
thanks
Hi,
The vtk5.8 transition is done, so we can start mono now.
Please start the uploads. :)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 648775 + pending
Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
648775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648775
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 14:12 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release.
I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since
a member of the release team needs to either ACK or
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 00:21 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Afaik, there is no bugs in konqueror-nsplugins, so excluding it from the
default install would be wrong.
Removing gnash from the default set of installed packages could be a option
though until someone has isolated the fix in gnsah
Processing changes file: t1lib_5.1.2-3+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: t1lib_5.1.2-3+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: t1lib_5.1.2-3+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: t1lib_5.1.2-3+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 20:27 -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
On 01/14/2012 11:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks. Would it be possible to have an updated diff without the cruft?
New patch attached.
Thanks.
(fwiw, I'm also not quite sure what some other parts of that patch have
to do with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 655178 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #655178 [release.debian.org] pu: package pidgin/2.7.3-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
655178:
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:07:07 +
with message-id 1326643627.29770.94.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#647658: Description-less packages file
has caused the Debian Bug report #647658,
regarding Description-less packages file
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
It would be useful if queue-viewer could run debdiff on binary uploads,
in order to catch things like missing or new files and permission
changes. If anything interesting is found this
Am 15.01.2012 13:25, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Yes, it needs an explicit manual ack before it moves in to
proposed-updates. We still prefer to finalise the debdiff before the
upload occurs however, as repeated upload/reject cycles are annoying for
both sides.
Looking at the diff in the
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
version of freetype there has some known issues.
Attached is a new debdiff for this proposed-update.
+xpdf (3.02-1.4+lenny4) oldstable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:30 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:32:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That was a while ago now, and the fix has made it to testing. Please
feel free to go ahead with the
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 05:26:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:30 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:32:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That was a while ago now, and the fix
Processing changes file: pidgin_2.7.3-1+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rmvoc-0001e2...@franck.debian.org
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 18:02 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 20:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 14:58 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
* Fix CVE-2011-2722 Insecure tempfile handling by
tag 623148 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 20:32 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 05:26:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:30 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
Please note that sid users actually didn't have a chance to check the fix
since
I think I have got a handle on what is going on here:
http://samiam.org/blog/20111229.html
experimental [CVE-2011-5056]: This only affects the authoritative
server. In previous versions this would be the same issue as the other
CVS tickets because then the authoritative and recursive servers
Processing changes file: webkit_1.2.7-0+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: hplip_3.10.6-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze5_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze5_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny15_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny15_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny15_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny15_armel.changes
ACCEPT
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
The packaging and configuration changes include:
- [amd64] reenable rt featureset (not available for Linux 3.1)
- Use xz compression
Related Bugs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655841
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655839
Most of the discussion is now ongoing here:
655841
such as the composition of the installation media.
What problems can modified media cause ?
--
-Alexey Eromenko
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted for Wheezy. According to
On 01/14/2012 11:02 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Would I be right in thinking that this also affects partial squeeze -
wheezy upgrades, assuming cairo is upgraded but gimp is not? If so then
I'd be happy to look at an upload including the patch you attached.
Yep, #655517 does affect partial
I'm hoping to get a new tasksel into an upcoming stable point release
to fix two bugs in the KDE desktop task.
Apparently konqueror is basically unusable since it crashes on websites
with flash. Removing browser-plugin-gnash from the task will fix that,
and the only collateral damange is that
On 15.01.2012 23:28, Maximilian Gerhard wrote:
Adding configs to ~/.pastebin.d overrides everything, because of the
pastebind configuration list reset. But that's the way it is upstream.
I've opened a ticket upstream to see if this is really intentional.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 01:55 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.2.1-1 to unstable early this
week. This is the latest upstream version (3.2) together with the first
upstream stable update.
I wonder which kernel is targeted
On 01/15/2012 12:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
The vtk5.8 transition is done, so we can start mono now.
Please start the uploads. :)
Alright, I have uploaded Mono 2.10.5-2 and cli-common 0.8 to unstable.
This officially starts the Mono 2.10 transition in Debian [0] [1] [2].
[0]
+1
heh... today I made a similar patch for #655841 (attached to bug),
only to discover Joey Hess already uploaded similar patch yesterday.
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
32 matches
Mail list logo
