On 17.01.2012 02:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005
>
> Okay. Even if this turns out to be another bug it would need to be
> resolved in unstable first
Of course.
> I've accepted the package you uploaded.
Many thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.64+squeeze6_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.76+squeeze6_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.63+squeeze6_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-ker
Processing changes file: kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rooai-00029c...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 648775 with 656690
Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10
Was blocked by: 649339
Added blocking bug(s) of 648775: 656690
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
648775: http://bugs.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 649173 + pending
Bug #649173 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.16
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
649173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
tag 649173 + pending
thanks
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 19:48 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> The package was uploaded. Thanks.
and accepted earlier this evening. :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:16:44 Niels Thykier wrote:
> That part was meant for Mark (and kwave). I was asking him to set a
> strict versioned build-dependency on libaudiofile-dev (>=
> 0.3.3-1~exp1)[1] if he uploads shortly after the new audiofile upload to
> unstable.
Niels,
No problem, kwave 0.
I've uploaded audiofile right now.
Regards,
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead; thanks.
The package was uploaded. Thanks.
--
-- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.7.15+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rojfr-0006lf...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 656653 + moreinfo
Bug #656653 [release.debian.org] nmu: banshee_2.2.1-2 (rebuild for mono
transition)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
tag 656653 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 01:53 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> nmu banshee_2.2.1-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for CLR 4.0 transition"
Is there a particular reason why the package needs specifically
rebuilding now, rather than along with everything else involved in the
mono trans
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu banshee_2.2.1-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for CLR 4.0 transition"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers oneiric-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 649173 + confirmed
Bug #649173 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.16
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
649173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
tags 649173 + confirmed
thanks
On 20.01.2012 14:45, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
A debdiff would be great, just for final checks; thanks.
Attached is a debdiff for 0.7.15+squeeze1 which includes all three
changes as discussed.
Please go ahe
Alexey Eromenko (20/01/2012):
> I _really_ hope this gnash patch can be included in this form or
> another for 6.0.4
You have been quite vocal already, please feel free to stop now.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Jan 20, 2012 11:21 "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Niels Thykier
> wrote:
> > Mark: If you upload right away, please remember version the -dev
> > dependency so we are sure it is built against the new audiofile
> > (saves us from doing a binNMU).
>
> Do you mea
I _really_ hope this gnash patch can be included in this form or
another for 6.0.4
--
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.o
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A debdiff would be great, just for final checks; thanks.
Attached is a debdiff for 0.7.15+squeeze1 which includes all three
changes as discussed.
Thanks,
--
-- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
diff -Nr
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:38:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Which versions are affected? All? (In which case you might need to
> > > contact the stable release managers to get the removed from Squeeze, too).
> > In CC.
>
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:26:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Please seek for "drugs/master.db" to find the relevant licensing
> information about the compilation of data. As far as I understand
> upstream upstream the database in the old version is featuring the same
> data sources in older ve
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 13:39 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [CC += -boot]
>
> On 16.01.2012 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> > If there is a further kernel update planned fo
[CC += -boot]
On 16.01.2012 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the
point
> release, it would be ideal if that could be upl
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Which versions are affected? All? (In which case you might need to
> > contact the stable release managers to get the removed from Squeeze, too).
> In CC.
squeeze doesn't have a master.db. As for the other drugs/*.db I don't thi
On 19.01.2012 22:35, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Do 19 Jan 2012 22:55:28 CET "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 19:42 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
A new version has been uploaded to Debian sid (0.3-3).
[...]
A debdiff is attached to this mail.
Thanks, although I think there
On 20.01.2012 10:16, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> To be clear, there are three changes up for consideration:
>
> (1) is #645599 which is essentially:
>
http://arthurdejong.org/viewvc/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd-0.7/debian/libnss-ldapd.con
Hi,
On 20.01.2012 10:40, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what
It would have been great if you could have coordinated the iceweasel 9
upload with the release team. From what I can see, this didn't happen
and has stalled the GNOME 3.2 transitio
Hi dear release team and FTP masters,
It's the time of the year when I want to get win32-loader migrated to
testing. So please let win32-loader 0.7.4.3 migrate to testing (it has
lived in unstable since June without much problems).
FTP-Masters: in sync with the release team, please copy the "stan
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Armhf and s390x are part of testing since ~2 weeks (see [1]). Could you
> please update the architectures list for Wheezy on edos.debian.net to
> reflect that change? It would help us to track evolution of
> installability counts for
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Mark: If you upload right away, please remember version the -dev dependency
> so we are sure it is built against the new audiofile (saves us from doing a
> binNMU).
Do you mean to rename libaudiofile-dev to libaudiofile1-dev or just to
se
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > To be clear, there are three changes up for consideration:
> >
> > (1) is #645599 which is essentially:
> >
> > http://arthurdejong.org/viewvc/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd-0.7/debian/libnss-ldapd.config?r1=1209&r2=1555
> > (2) is a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
sent this to debian-devel@ before noticing the proper workflow.
Hi!
I sort of became the (temporary?) maintainer of libmusicbrainz, so
it's probably reasonable to look at the status
Hi,
Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what
to do next: Iceweasel 10 is due on January 30 and I would like to
promptly upload it to unstable. There is a major change coming with
Iceweasel 10: it will be supported upstream for more than 6 weeks.
The timing of this ext
On Jan 19, 2012 21:36 "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Mark Purcell
> wrote:
> > I am happy to upload to unstable, once audiofile is uploaded.
>
> Thank you Mark!
>
> Niels, I think we're ready, aren't we?
>
> Thank you very much, guys, for all your time and work.
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> clone 656573 -1
> reassing -1 snapshot.debian.org
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> Am 20.01.2012 09:40, schrieb Andreas Tille:
>
> > it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file
> > global_resourc
Hi,
Armhf and s390x are part of testing since ~2 weeks (see [1]). Could you
please update the architectures list for Wheezy on edos.debian.net to
reflect that change? It would help us to track evolution of
installability counts for Wheezy on those architectures over time.
[1]
http://anonscm.debi
36 matches
Mail list logo
