Hi Sylvestre
> Salvatore Bonaccorso
>udav (U)
I have prepared the package 'udav' for this transition. But I cannot
build it currently. I will upload once I can test it.
Many thanks for your work,
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(Still learning the ropes.)
Cyril Brulebois (25/01/2012):
> Looking at the transition page[1], concentrating on packages in testing,
> for dependency level 1, a local binNMU build led to the following
> results:
> | couchdbbuild OK, deps OK.
> | dehydra#655779
> |
Hi,
Mike Hommey (02/01/2012):
> nmu gjs_1.30.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu gnome_shell_3.2.1-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gjs rebuilt against
> libmozjs9d"
already done independently when src:mozjs was introduced.
> nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozj
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
yajl 2.0.4 is currently in experimental, and I hope to upload it to
unstable. This includes a soname bump: libyajl1 -> libyajl2
The following source packages will need a binNMU:
coll
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 648775 with 657261
Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10
Was blocked by: 656817 656821 656756 657258 656818 656760 656822 649339 656690
656761 657256
Added blocking bug(s) of 648775: 657261
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 648775 with 657258
Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10
Was blocked by: 656756 656821 656817 656818 656760 656822 649339 656690 657256
656761
Added blocking bug(s) of 648775: 657258
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 648775 with 657256
Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10
Was blocked by: 656817 656821 656756 656818 656760 656822 649339 656690 656761
Added blocking bug(s) of 648775: 657256
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Michael Biebl (20/01/2012):
> > Or are we heading for having a separate libmozjs package, which would
> > solve half the current problem with new iceweasel releases?
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mozjs_1.8.5-1.0.0+dfsg-1.html
>
> At least for GNOME/gjs we are planning to use mozjs185 as s
Hi,
Nick Leverton (24/01/2012):
> Please could you check my workings as this will be my first
> transition, and if possible then make a schedule for this change ?
I'll try and check it up, and where to find a slot compatible with other
transitions. Reminders welcome in any cases.
Mraw,
KiBi.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 14:00:33 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:00:53 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >
> >> Upstream has committed symbol versioning for both the 3.9.x branch and
> >> the trunk (4.0.0) and is prepared to release 3.9.6 and 4.
Dear release managers,
I think that I've identified all the affected packages for this transition
of libupnp3 to libupnp6, and raised bugs on those which need changes
(vlc: #656830, amule: #656831, djmount: #656832, gmediaserver: #656833).
amule have already fixed the build-depend and uploaded wh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 631019 with 657203
Bug #631019 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5 1.8.x
Was blocked by: 651453 652310 652313 652308 643488 650598 652315 651452 652309
652314 652312 652025 646142 652307 641790 624671 657198 657199 652311
Added blocking b
Oh and I should have been talking about CVE-2011-5056 anyway. But I do
think CVE-2011-5055 is resolved.
On 24/01/12 20:14, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Moritz,
> Actually it is acknowledged to be present in 2.0.04-*.
>
> On 24/01/12 19:05, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03
Moritz,
Actually it is acknowledged to be present in 2.0.04-*.
On 24/01/12 19:05, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:32:29PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> Second attempt at preparing a fix for this issue.
>>
>> By the way CVE-2011-5055, as far as I can see, only appl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 650516 with 656829
Bug #650516 [exiv2] exiv2: please package 0.21 or newer to unstable
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 650516: 656829
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
650
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 631019 with 657199 657198
Bug #631019 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5 1.8.x
Was blocked by: 624671 641790 643488 646142 650598 651452 651453 652025 652307
652308 652309 652310 652311 652312 652313 652314 652315
Added blocking bug(s) o
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:32:29PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Second attempt at preparing a fix for this issue.
>
> By the way CVE-2011-5055, as far as I can see, only applies to the
> experimental release. That will be fixed when upstream issue a new
> upstream 2.x release. Could the securit
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:00:53 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> Upstream has committed symbol versioning for both the 3.9.x branch and
>> the trunk (4.0.0) and is prepared to release 3.9.6 and 4.0.1 with symbol
>> versioning once we sign off that it's what we're looking
Hello,
It's been more than a month that we requested permission to proceed
with the new imagemagick transition; is there be anything specific
that prevents us from uploading the current imagemagick in
experimental to unstable ?
Thanks,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-r
Hi!
* Philipp Kern [120120 15:41]:
> > In case the version in Squeeze would be considered free also all
> > other versions are free (which would be *really* good news). So
> > please, please prove me wrong in my opinion that this database is
> > not distributable. I'm specifically concerned ab
Second attempt at preparing a fix for this issue.
By the way CVE-2011-5055, as far as I can see, only applies to the
experimental release. That will be fixed when upstream issue a new
upstream 2.x release. Could the security page be updated to reflect that.
On 18/01/12 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wro
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:05:49PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>As I've just been discussing with folks on IRC, it's been a while
>since we had one in the UK, and we're going to freeze this summer
>according to the release team. So...
>
>I'm tempted to host a BSP one weekend in March
Steve,
Thanks for all the work.
It would be good to have ITK4 in 'experimental'. Having coexisting
packages is nice to have but will cause probably too much trouble
(especially if we build all the language wrappers again)
Thanks
-Dominique
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Steve M. Robbins wro
Sergey B Kirpichev (24/01/2012):
> Yep. Typo fixed.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-memcache/php-memcache_3.0.4-4+squeeze1.dsc
Thanks, please go ahead.
I forgot to mention that in my first mail, but the merge window for
6.0.4 closed this week-end, so your package will be a
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:11:28AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > +php-memcache (3.0.4-4~squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
>
> We currently have 3.0.4-4 in squeeze, and 3.0.4-4~squeeze1 is below it,
> not above (see dpkg --compare-versions foo '<' bar). Please use
> 3.0.4-4+squeeze1 instead.
Yep.
Hi,
Sergey B Kirpichev (24/01/2012):
> I would like to make an upload [1] to stable in order to fix bug in
> php-memcache package (and include maintainer change too).
>
> The full patch between this new package version and the version
> 3.0.4-4 currently in Squeeze is attached.
AFAICT that look
Dear Release Team,
I would like to make an upload [1] to stable in order to fix bug in
php-memcache package (and include maintainer change too).
The full patch between this new package version and the version
3.0.4-4 currently in Squeeze is attached.
[1]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/ma
21.01.2012 16:47, Julien Cristau kirjoitti:
Hi Timo,
Hey Julien!
* ears
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628475
which renders the package useless -> remove?
If that renders the package useless then the bug severity should be
"grave".
Yep, done.
Please make sur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656587 with 657018 657016 657013 657012 657011 657004 657003 656604
Bug #656587 [release.debian.org] transition: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Was blocked by: 628475
Added blocking bug(s) of 656587: 657013, 657003, 656604, 657018, 657016,
657012, 6570
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656587 with 628475
Bug #656587 [release.debian.org] transition: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 656587: 628475
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656587:
30 matches
Mail list logo
