Thanks Peter.
That upload is OK.
Thanks
Since i'm not yet a DD could one of you guys please sponsor it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f48
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:44:17 peter green wrote:
> peter green wrote:
> > Would you object to a NMU based on the version currently in unstable
> > that just fixes the FTBFS?
>
> I have now prepared a NMU based on the version currently in sid that
> only fixes the FTBFS. The debdiff is attatched.
>
peter green wrote:
Would you object to a NMU based on the version currently in unstable
that just fixes the FTBFS?
I have now prepared a NMU based on the version currently in sid that
only fixes the FTBFS. The debdiff is attatched.
libosip2 maintainers are you ok with this NMU?
diff -u libosip
[Cc list trimmed]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
> > > upload for l
We are currently awaiting a transition slot via debian-release.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656839
Understood
According to the endorsed workflow, we should not upload to unstable without
approval from the release team:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transiti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 661078 confirmed
Bug #661078 [release.debian.org] britney: ignore additional packages in Sources
index
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
661078: http://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 661078 confirmed
thanks
On 2012-02-24 10:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-02-24 09:33, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I think so. If there are two sources with different version, she
> completely ignores the lowest version. So that is definitely not a problem.
>
> Britney has her
On 2012-02-24 09:33, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> [...]
>> Assuming there will be a source package in Sources only kept due to
>> Built-Using, then Britney may (or may not) keep its counterpart in
>> testing until the source package disappears from Sources (in sid). If
>> it
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 09:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I would like to include additional packages referenced by Built-Using in
> > the Sources index[1] at some undefined point in the future. This might
> > confuse britney which would need to just ignore them.
[...]
> I believe Britney alread
Niels Thykier writes:
> I believe Britney already handles this reasonably[1]. Of course, I
> assume here that by "ignore" you mean it is (also) okay for Britney not
> to include them in the resulting HeidiResult file.
That is fine.
> Assuming there will be a source package in Sources only kept
On 2012-02-24 01:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: britney
>
> I would like to include additional packages referenced by Built-Using in
> the Sources index[1] at some undefined point in the futu
11 matches
Mail list logo
