Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
> one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
> sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
> resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does
Joey,
Also what happens when you force through the installation of
w3c-dtd-xhtml version 1.2-2 and w3c-sgml-lib? Does wdg-html-validator
behave itself for you then?
On 20/04/12 00:51, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. S
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
resolve that but the 1.2-2 version of w3c-sgml-lib does NOT have a
Provides clause.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not
> afterwards because I tried to test it.
w3c-sgml-lib provides/conflicts w3c-dtd-xhtml, and w3c-markup-validator
depends on both packages, so this happens:
joey@wren:~>validate index.html
joey@wren:~>sudo a
Joey,
Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not afterwards
because I tried to test it.
On 19/04/12 22:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
links
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:16:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:09:05PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > libreoffice: CHECK-NEEDED (but it's so huge and there was no problem before)
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/configure.in?h=libreoffice-3-5#
Dear Release Team,
Since the beginning of the development cycle for Wheezy [0], the Ruby
team has been working on several big changes in the Ruby policy for a
better support of several versions of the interpreter and improvement of
the global quality of Ruby packages.
0: http://www.lucas-nuss
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
> w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of
> links). I have endeavoured to fix all conflicts and ensure that
> nsgmls, wdg-html-validator, w3c-markup-validator still work. I have
> to put a ca
On 2012-04-14 13:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks for working on fixing this in stable. fwiw, "-6+squeeze1" is
> more conventional, although it's unlikely to make a difference in this
> case. Please feel free to go ahead with the upload.
I'm not exactly sure whether the nvidia-graphics-module
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I'd like to request a transition slot for openjpeg 1.5. the main reason for 1.5
is that it fixes JPEG 2000 support in PDF file, see #659226 & #667708
List of impacted packages are:
gp
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:01:28 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> However, when libpng15 is installed in unstable instead of libpng12,
> it will be in
> the state where many packages depending on libpng12 do not operate.
> Is the way which enabled it to install libpng12 and libpng15
> simultaneo
2012/4/5 Julien Cristau :
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 08:17:29 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
>> Yes, libopng maintainers will upload libpng1.5 and libpng1.2 to
>> unstable on this week.
>>
> What? At least I don't want another copy of libpng in wheezy without a
> plan to get rid of the other one
12 matches
Mail list logo
