Miguel A. Colón Vélez writes:
> It seems that this is related to bug #590905.
> The mysql_config file now contains the following line:
> libs_r=" $ldflags -L$pkglibdir -lmysqlclient_r -lpthread -lz -lm
> -lrt -lssl -lcrypto -ldl "
[...]
> Adding a build dependency to libssl-dev solves the
Hello:
It seems that this is related to bug #590905.
The mysql_config file now contains the following line:
libs_r=" $ldflags -L$pkglibdir -lmysqlclient_r -lpthread -lz -lm
-lrt -lssl -lcrypto -ldl "
And the package fails with:
configure:12514: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -fstack-protector
--para
Patrick Baggett wrote:
> OK, I don't mind checking them out, but like I said before I have *no
> idea* where
> the ia64-specific bug reports are ("no idea what the debian way is", see
> above). I read this email that you marked as [1], and I still don't know
> where these bug reports are. I think
Hi,
Bertrand Marc (11/05/2012):
> It's fine with me. GNUnet 0.8 is not very useful anyway since it is
> not compatible with 0.9 and there are not many users left on the 0.8
> network.
libmicrohttpd migrated tonight, with a bunch of binNMUs. The old binary
stays in testing for the following packa
Dear Adam, dear Ansgar,
On 05/14/2012 12:58 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 00:37 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Steffen Möller writes:
>>> I was sponsoring
>>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rampart.html
>>> which fixes a number of bugs but does not migrate to testing, eve
George Danchev (13/05/2012):
> Just to add few more hopefully helpful bits.
>
> 1) the changelog of not yet uploaded package to sid, waiting for
> your green light:
Thanks, that's appreciated.
> bobcat (3.00.02-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream release (bumps the soname version).
>
Hi again,
Nicolas Boullis (13/05/2012):
> If I understand what a "ben file" is, I think a "ben file" for this
> transition could be:
>
> title = "libcdio";
> is_affected = .depends ~ /libcdio-cdda[01]/ | .depends ~
> /libcdio-paranoia[01]/ | .depends ~ /libcdio1[03]/ | .depends ~
> /libiso966
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
let's track the x264 transition, as spotted in:
http://lists.debian.org/20120511012202.ge20...@mraw.org
Soname bump:
libx264-120 → libx264-123
The tracker will ap
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports
> against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2
> months ago as a simple e-mail to debian-release@l.d.o, but my message
>
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 00:37 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Steffen Möller writes:
> > I was sponsoring
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rampart.html
> > which fixes a number of bugs but does not migrate to testing, even
> > though those bugs are closed. Should we upload another version that
>
Hi KiBi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:19:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> does it mean the API didn't change much,
That's true.
> and that you test-rebuilt those packages?
Unfortunately not.
I test-rebuilt vcdimager (which lead me to patching libcdio to revert a
change in i
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Möller writes:
> I was sponsoring
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rampart.html
> which fixes a number of bugs but does not migrate to testing, even
> though those bugs are closed. Should we upload another version that
> closes those bugs in the changelog?
Testing migration
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Boullis (13/05/2012):
> A binNMU should be enough for all these packages.
does it mean the API didn't change much, and that you test-rebuilt those
packages?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
We currently have a team working on NMUing wine for the wheezy
release. 1.0 is currently in testing, 1.2 is in unstable, and our
goal is to get 1.4 into the release. Our 1.4 package is already
uploaded to deferred [0], but due to appropriate NMU delays it will be
7 days before it goes in.
Once i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable.
Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio, upgrading from 0.81 to 0.83
means breaking the ABI and changing the sonames of t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 650058 src:pdns
Bug #650058 [pdns] pdns: FTBFS with multiarch sqlite3 and libmysqlclient-dev
Bug reassigned from package 'pdns' to 'src:pdns'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.9.22-9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 650058
Bug #650058 {Done: Matthias Klose } [pdns] pdns: FTBFS with
multiarch sqlite3 and libmysqlclient-dev
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re
Dear Release-Team,
the Haskell team has been discussion what we would like to see in wheezy
and I’d like to keep you in the loop.
Short version: Some new packages will be uploaded during the next week
or two, then we allow things to stabilize, then everything ought to
migrate to testing in one b
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hur
On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went
through
the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones.
There were a
On 13.05.2012 21:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> > This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an
>>> > alternative,
>>> >
On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
> This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an
alternative,
> just that it is highly problematic as the default at this point of
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:42:21 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I am only aware of these usertags:
> debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508
> do you known about a new rebuild?
>
No, I've seen bugs being filed from watching -bugs-rc.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the b
On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago.
>> Seeing the number of new bug reports that ke
Hi,
I am a bit puzzled by reading the
- kde-runtime should build again, but must not migrate to testing
before qt4-x11, according to Pino. That one is missing ~4 days, we
could always age it if needed.
in this bug.
What is the problem here, and why is it not covered by the package
depende
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago.
> Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think
> the switch shou
On 2012-04-26 00:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Jakub Adam (CC'ed) and I have been looking at including Eclipse 3.8
>> (Juno) in Wheezy. The release date for Eclipse 3.8 is the 27th of
>> June, which is probably after we freeze "in June".
>>
>> We believe th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 with 672765
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 651110 672714 650060 672619 666331 672716 667428 672621
651317 649638 668232 672588
671115 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
I can get #651620 (rocksndiamonds)
I fixed this some time ago for Slackware.
2012/5/13 Niels Thykier
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
> have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be found in
the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list can be found
in the removals.txt file (also
Processing changes file: emesene_1.6.3-1.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1stycw-0005dm...@franck.debian.org
tags 672698 + pending
thanks
On 12.05.2012 23:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.05.2012 23:41, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Please consider the attached patch to fix #648399 in stable.
Please go ahead; thanks.
For the record, this was uploaded and I've just flagged it for
acceptance in to p-u;
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 672698 + pending
Bug #672698 [release.debian.org] pu: emesene 1.6.3-1.1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
672698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672698
De
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 653823 with 670053 670054 672750 672749 672748 672746 672745
Bug #653823 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.49
653823 was blocked by: 652784 653805 652775 652795 653806 652788 653796 672524
653807 653625 652798 652786 652797
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 653823 with 672524
Bug #653823 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.49
653823 was blocked by: 652784 653805 652795 652775 652788 653806 653796 653807
652798 653625 652786 652797 652790
653823 was blocking: 653228
Added blocking
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 19:00:11 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 22:05:11 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed there are some packages which still build-depend on versioned
> > boost libraries, for example:
> >
[...]
> > Do we want to fix them for whee
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2012 13:23:34 +0200
with message-id <20120513112334.gd31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#573187: transition: mpi-defaults
has caused the Debian Bug report #573187,
regarding transition: mpi-defaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago.
Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think
the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the month old
bugs still o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 by 672714672716
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 651110 650060 666331 672619 667428 672621 651317 649638
668232 672588
671115 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 67
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671115 by 667428 668232 651317 666331 672621 649638
Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5
671115 was blocked by: 650060 672619 672588
671115 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 671115: 651110, 651317, 666331,
43 matches
Mail list logo
