Hi Cyril,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:26:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libfsotransport0
to libfsotransport1. That can be seen on the excuses page, and that
explains why your package isn't migrating:
We plan to switch away from git
Hello,
and thanks for the quick answer.
Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org (24/05/2012):
binNMU should work without FTBFS, but as I said we will update the
packages this week, so I guess binNMU is not needed.
OK.
pkg-fso is the Maintainer of all reverse dependencies, so I assumed
that
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 17:45 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:02:33PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
I may be being naive, but could an X86 PC be used with an ARM chroot and
qemu-arm-static to emulate ARM instructions? Or is qemu not stable
enough, or the emulated environment
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
we (pkg-mozext) currently introduced a change of behaviour on the
mozilla-devscripts package when processing the automatic setup of
{xpi:Breaks} matching a certain field on the
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:31:27 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
it seems like we have an uncoordinated transition, from libh323-1.21.0
to libh323-1.24.0.
KiBi,
Sorry about that, I should of included this with the ptlib transition.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
Alle venerdì 18 maggio 2012, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto:
Pino Toscano p...@debian.org (18/05/2012):
I think we are generally done, at least with the binNMUs I am aware
of wrt problems due to the multiarch library path changes.
Well almost, I just found (because of Lucas' rebuilds) two
Hi Shirish,
On 24/05/12 12:20, shirish शिरीष wrote:
http://snapshot.debian.org/pool/main/k/kdepimlibs/libkabc4_4.7.4-2+b1_amd64.deb
2012-05-24 22:12:28 ERROR 404: Not Found.
The mirror URI is wrong, you used http://snapshot.debian.org/ but there
should be more after it:
If you want to add a
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:59:57AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
Not that horrible. I just did a kernel build on my laptop in an ARM
chroot and it took 19m43s, doing it as a cross-build took 1m14s. I
haven't got my Pandaboard setup to do a comparison, but I
suspect it wouldn't be much faster than my
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:06:30AM -0400, wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:59:57AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
Not that horrible. I just did a kernel build on my laptop in an ARM
chroot and it took 19m43s, doing it as a cross-build took 1m14s. I
haven't got my Pandaboard setup to do a comparison,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:35:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the
On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Very quickly following up on a possible nomenclature issue and a
couple
of other things.
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 17:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
- We of course aim at tech preview for wheezy only, not a full
release. Our goal is to establish a
Looks like group reply in my mailer means reply only to the mailing list
I have defined a filter for? Anyway, forwarding to debian-release too.
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com
Reply-to: Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com
To:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:22 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
How are you doing the build using qemu's cpu emulator? I remember last
I played with it I had issues with shared libraries where the command
i wanted to run needed to find its shared libraries, but if I set the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:35:27PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Is there a definition of what broken and fucked means, so this could be
related to. Also, is tech preview defined somewhere. Were there any
descriptions made/discussions when kFreeBSD was introduced for Squeeze?
Yes. c.f.
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 19:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Looks like group reply in my mailer means reply only to the mailing list
I have defined a filter for? Anyway, forwarding to debian-release too.
*checks headers* You wanted reply all, predictably enough. Which
means this is now
Hi all,
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 02:50 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:31:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
This bug blocks lvm2 from migrating to testing. Maybe cryptmount should
temporarily removed from testing? Or are tools wrong, and lvm2 update
don't make situation
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:12:25PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:22 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
How are you doing the build using qemu's cpu emulator? I remember last
I played with it I had issues with shared libraries where the command
i wanted to run needed to find its
The last release on the Ruby 1.8 series, 1.8.7, is scheduled for LTS
starting June, and total EOL June 2013:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
The Ruby 1.9 series brings massive speed improvements over the 1.8
series due to the new YARV/KRI bytecode interpreter.
In addition to the massive
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:42 -0700, shawn wrote:
What I would like for Wheezy would be:
1. Change the default ruby interpreter in Wheezy to 1.9.3. [1]
2. Drop the ruby1.8 option after the release of Wheezy
[...]
Thoughts? Needs? Comments?
[...]
[1]
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 21:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:42 -0700, shawn wrote:
What I would like for Wheezy would be:
1. Change the default ruby interpreter in Wheezy to 1.9.3. [1]
2. Drop the ruby1.8 option after the release of Wheezy
[...]
Thoughts? Needs?
The last release on the Ruby 1.8 series, 1.8.7, is scheduled for LTS
starting June, and total EOL June 2013:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
The Ruby 1.9 series brings massive speed improvements over the 1.8
series due to the new YARV/KRI bytecode interpreter.
In addition to the massive
The last release on the Ruby 1.8 series, 1.8.7, is scheduled for LTS
starting June, and total EOL June 2013:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
The Ruby 1.9 series brings massive speed improvements over the 1.8
series due to the new YARV/KRI bytecode interpreter.
In addition to the massive
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 672824 src:mediatomb
Bug #672824 [mediatomb] mediatomb: FTBFS on sid: checking for mysql_init... no
Bug reassigned from package 'mediatomb' to 'src:mediatomb'.
No longer marked as found in versions mediatomb/0.12.1-4.
Ignoring request to
On May 24, 2012 3:25 PM, shawn shawnland...@gmail.com wrote:
The last release on the Ruby 1.8 series, 1.8.7, is scheduled for LTS
starting June, and total EOL June 2013:
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
Define LTS since it can mean plenty of things. To most 1.8 is about to hit
EOL just
Where does anything tell the system to use qemu to run stiff?
I could understand if binmisc was setup for it, but I see nothing that
should make it get used
AIUI the magic is supplied by binfmt-support and the debian qemu packages
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
In #672142 Cyril Brulebois offered to review the package, but he just
notified me that he won't get to it for another week or so. If someone
else wants to review and possibly sponsor the package, that would be
greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
in-line :-
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Hi Shirish,
Hi Steven,
On 24/05/12 12:20, shirish शिरीष wrote:
http://snapshot.debian.org/pool/main/k/kdepimlibs/libkabc4_4.7.4-2+b1_amd64.deb
2012-05-24 22:12:28 ERROR 404: Not Found.
The mirror URI
28 matches
Mail list logo
